QuartzGooner wrote:Bergkamp-Genius wrote:QuartzGooner wrote:I too think something odd about the pair and something odd and unsettling about the whole trial, not sure the bloke found guilty was involved.
Oh he was definitely involved...he hasn't admitted to involvement in the murder as someone suggested, but there is no doubt he is one of the culprits if not the culprit...
There was a multitude of evidence putting him at the scene, his dna was on her and he left a shit in the toilet..so he couldn't deny he was there..So he made up a story that she invited him back, he had some sexual contact with her, went to the toilet and when he was in the toilet she was murdered by an unknown assailant
...
The only question is did he break in to the house on his own and do it all himself or did Knox and Sollecito bring him back there...
I think they brought him back there and were involved with what happened, for me it's the only thing that explains all the lies that were told by knox and Sollecito from the very start, and of course the strange behaviour didn't exactly make them look innocent...
It could be that is what happened.
But if Knox and her boyfriend's only involvement was to bring the Black bloke back to the apartment they were not guilty of anything, so then why did Knox try to blame another guy (her former boss) who was proven to be elsewhere on the night of the crime?
What loyalty does she have to the guy in prison that she has to cover up for him?
Something is being hidden, not sure we will ever find out what.
Yes it 'could' be what happened but highly highly unlikely...When they picked the guy up, after he fled the country, he denied having ever been there or having any involvement..He changed his story numerous times as the evidence was thrown at him and as he became aware of the full extent of the evidence he eventually came up with a story that attempted to explain it all away...
Hence the story about her taking him back there and having consensual sexual activity, this was to explain away his fingerprints at the murder scene and his Dna all over the place and on the victim...
The story about being in the toilet while she was being murdered in the next room explains away all the evidence of him being in the bathroom and his involvement in the murder, and why there was evidence that he was there after blood had been spilt...If you really think there is any chance he wasn't the murderer or one of them, if i ever go up on trial for a serious crime i want you on my jury for sure, i'll use the martians did it defence..
And the whole story from Guede is made to look all the more ridiculous when you add in that she had just been out with friends and then left to go home alone...So we are supposed to believe strolling home she picked up this ugly f*cker she didn't know to take home for sex...i think not...
As for my suggestion Knox brought Guede back there, i wasn't suggesting they brought him back and let him wander around the house alone and he just happened to murder her room mate, unbeknown to Knox...I was suggesting they brought him back there and instigated and were a part of whatever happened...
There are two reasons why she wouldn't implicate Guede..one is that she didn't have anything to do with it and knew nothing about it, and the other is if she implicates him she is as good as admitting she was there and knew exactly what happened...
The implicating the bar owner was to distract the police from the true killers and possibly to divert attention from Guede should anyone have seen a black guy entering or leaving the property with her and Sollecito...She knew if they picked up the the bar owner he couldn't implicate her because he wasn't there...
