Are you related to Radford 149?Babatunde wrote:Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

The problem with the point you're making is that the wenger who turned the likes of Adams and co around is not the same wenger who now masquerades as a football manager. The two are as different as night and day.Belfast Boy wrote:n6gooner wrote: Belfast Boy wrote: Babatunde wrote: n6gooner wrote: aw inherited ta5, got lucky with pv4 and hasn't had a clue about what "captain material" entails ever since. truth is that he couldn't handle the strong character of a real captain which is why neither adams nor vieira returned after retiring
Thank you very much!
Have to disagree with this, DD was lobbying for AW to get the job of AFC manager long before before Bruce Rioch got the job the and the reason the board initially rejected his suggestion was them looking at AW's portfolio, commenting that he looked like a school teacher or a "professor" and that he would not be able to handle the senior and/or more difficult characters in the dressing room like Adams, Parlour and Merson etc who were, lets face it, hardened drinkers and in Merse's case a degenerate gambler and coke head, and regardless of the subsequent downturn it's very hard to argue deny he turned the culture not just of the club but of the whole league completely around!
bb - can't dispute what you say, however, not sure what that has to do with aw being unable to appoint conventional, strong and inspiring captains
My point is that you seem to be suggesting that AW is deliberately refusing to appoint strong characters because he can't handle them and I'm saying that how he turned round the careers of Adams etc. whose repuatations and standing at the club, not to mention their drink fuelled exploits, were legendary, suggests otherwise!
It's also true that rightly or wrongly, continental culture does not place the same level of importance on the captaincy as we do, with the honour usually goin to the most senior player regardless of leadership qualities!
didn't suggest he is "deliberately refusing" rather that he's failed, persistently, to realise the importance of a strong leader (that is the captain) and this is where we've lost our way since the departure of adams swiftly followed by vieira. we all know that the missing ingredient since cardiff 2005 has been mental toughness when it matters (ie. cl final, cc final v chelsea, post-eduardo tackle v birm, cc final v birm, repeated epl collapses after xmas, etc etc)Belfast Boy wrote:My point is that you seem to be suggesting that AW is deliberately refusing to appoint strong characters because he can't handle them and I'm saying that how he turned round the careers of Adams etc. whose repuatations and standing at the club, not to mention their drink fuelled exploits, were legendary, suggests otherwise!n6gooner wrote:bb - can't dispute what you say, however, not sure what that has to do with aw being unable to appoint conventional, strong and inspiring captainsBelfast Boy wrote:Have to disagree with this, DD was lobbying for AW to get the job of AFC manager long before before Bruce Rioch got the job the and the reason the board initially rejected his suggestion was them looking at AW's portfolio, commenting that he looked like a school teacher or a "professor" and that he would not be able to handle the senior and/or more difficult characters in the dressing room like Adams, Parlour and Merson etc who were, lets face it, hardened drinkers and in Merse's case a degenerate gambler and coke head, and regardless of the subsequent downturn it's very hard to argue deny he turned the culture not just of the club but of the whole league completely around!Babatunde wrote:Thank you very much!n6gooner wrote:aw inherited ta5, got lucky with pv4 and hasn't had a clue about what "captain material" entails ever since. truth is that he couldn't handle the strong character of a real captain which is why neither adams nor vieira returned after retiring
It's also true that rightly or wrongly, continental culture does not place the same level of importance on the captaincy as we do, with the honour usually goin to the most senior player regardless of leadership qualities!
agreed - that was the board realising he had the midas touch back in 2004 and corrupting him whilst "playing his ego like a fiddle" so much so that he allowed dd to leave without making a stand. he's still a v.good coach but was never a "lone ranger" as history has proved.......bit like cloughDUFFMAN wrote:The problem with the point you're making is that the wenger who turned the likes of Adams and co around is not the same wenger who now masquerades as a football manager. The two are as different as night and day.Belfast Boy wrote:n6gooner wrote: Belfast Boy wrote: Babatunde wrote: n6gooner wrote: aw inherited ta5, got lucky with pv4 and hasn't had a clue about what "captain material" entails ever since. truth is that he couldn't handle the strong character of a real captain which is why neither adams nor vieira returned after retiring
Thank you very much!
Have to disagree with this, DD was lobbying for AW to get the job of AFC manager long before before Bruce Rioch got the job the and the reason the board initially rejected his suggestion was them looking at AW's portfolio, commenting that he looked like a school teacher or a "professor" and that he would not be able to handle the senior and/or more difficult characters in the dressing room like Adams, Parlour and Merson etc who were, lets face it, hardened drinkers and in Merse's case a degenerate gambler and coke head, and regardless of the subsequent downturn it's very hard to argue deny he turned the culture not just of the club but of the whole league completely around!
bb - can't dispute what you say, however, not sure what that has to do with aw being unable to appoint conventional, strong and inspiring captains
My point is that you seem to be suggesting that AW is deliberately refusing to appoint strong characters because he can't handle them and I'm saying that how he turned round the careers of Adams etc. whose repuatations and standing at the club, not to mention their drink fuelled exploits, were legendary, suggests otherwise!
It's also true that rightly or wrongly, continental culture does not place the same level of importance on the captaincy as we do, with the honour usually goin to the most senior player regardless of leadership qualities!
For me, he seems to have lost his bottle and turned into a scrawny, disheveled downtrodden old man.
I swear he has an evil tottnumb supporting twin who took over 7 years ago much like the tony Blair/ Gordon brown agreement .
Very, very much like clough.n6gooner wrote:DUFFMAN wrote: Belfast Boy wrote: n6gooner wrote: Belfast Boy wrote: Babatunde wrote: n6gooner wrote: aw inherited ta5, got lucky with pv4 and hasn't had a clue about what "captain material" entails ever since. truth is that he couldn't handle the strong character of a real captain which is why neither adams nor vieira returned after retiring
Thank you very much!
Have to disagree with this, DD was lobbying for AW to get the job of AFC manager long before before Bruce Rioch got the job the and the reason the board initially rejected his suggestion was them looking at AW's portfolio, commenting that he looked like a school teacher or a "professor" and that he would not be able to handle the senior and/or more difficult characters in the dressing room like Adams, Parlour and Merson etc who were, lets face it, hardened drinkers and in Merse's case a degenerate gambler and coke head, and regardless of the subsequent downturn it's very hard to argue deny he turned the culture not just of the club but of the whole league completely around!
bb - can't dispute what you say, however, not sure what that has to do with aw being unable to appoint conventional, strong and inspiring captains
My point is that you seem to be suggesting that AW is deliberately refusing to appoint strong characters because he can't handle them and I'm saying that how he turned round the careers of Adams etc. whose repuatations and standing at the club, not to mention their drink fuelled exploits, were legendary, suggests otherwise!
It's also true that rightly or wrongly, continental culture does not place the same level of importance on the captaincy as we do, with the honour usually goin to the most senior player regardless of leadership qualities!
The problem with the point you're making is that the wenger who turned the likes of Adams and co around is not the same wenger who now masquerades as a football manager. The two are as different as night and day.
For me, he seems to have lost his bottle and turned into a scrawny, disheveled downtrodden old man.
I swear he has an evil tottnumb supporting twin who took over 7 years ago much like the tony Blair/ Gordon brown agreement .
agreed - that was the board realising he had the midas touch back in 2004 and corrupting him whilst "playing his ego like a fiddle" so much so that he allowed dd to leave without making a stand. he's still a v.good coach but was never a "lone ranger" as history has proved.......bit like clough
I cannot argue that we're going thru really bad times at the club DUFFMAN, in a lot of ways and not just on the pitch either, but I don't think that AW can be labelled arrogant and also the above!DUFFMAN wrote: The problem with the point you're making is that the wenger who turned the likes of Adams and co around is not the same wenger who now masquerades as a football manager. The two are as different as night and day.
For me, he seems to have lost his bottle and turned into a scrawny, disheveled downtrodden old man.
I swear he has an evil tottnumb supporting twin who took over 7 years ago much like the tony Blair/ Gordon brown agreement .
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you meant but you wrote that AW couldn't handle strong characters which is why TA4 or PV4 weren't brought backn6gooner wrote: didn't suggest he is "deliberately refusing" rather that he's failed, persistently, to realise the importance of a strong leader (that is the captain) and this is where we've lost our way since the departure of adams swiftly followed by vieira. we all know that the missing ingredient since cardiff 2005 has been mental toughness when it matters (ie. cl final, cc final v chelsea, post-eduardo tackle v birm, cc final v birm, repeated epl collapses after xmas, etc etc)
despite being one of aw's biggest fans i'm not deluded enough to believe he turned adams' career around. he "prolonged" the careers of the back four he inherited which is slightly, but significantly, different and was extremely beneficial to him.
as timely as aw's dietary/anti-alcohol influence was when he arrived, i suspect the acceleration of the speed at which the game is played was already changing nutritional attitudes across the world. granted, aw was amongst the first to spot this though
Really!!Belfast Boy wrote:DUFFMAN wrote:
The problem with the point you're making is that the wenger who turned the likes of Adams and co around is not the same wenger who now masquerades as a football manager. The two are as different as night and day.
For me, he seems to have lost his bottle and turned into a scrawny, disheveled downtrodden old man.
I swear he has an evil tottnumb supporting twin who took over 7 years ago much like the tony Blair/ Gordon brown agreement .
I cannot argue that we're going thru really bad times at the club DUFFMAN, in a lot of ways and not just on the pitch either, but I don't think that AW can be labelled arrogant and also the above!
The way he talks is arrogant and his stubbornness and his reluctance to change is 100% arrogantBelfast Boy wrote:I never said he wasn't under pressure and he takes on a lot of it in one of the highest pressure jobs there is which will eventually show no matter who you are!
I'd be much more concerned if he looked as if he hadn't a care in the world, even AF was creakin when ManU won nothin but the CC for 3 years,
but you yourself labeled him as arrogant durin the summer, now you're sayin he's a downtrodden and broken man