Eboue

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

tonysaunders wrote:For some reason, unbeknownst to me, I've just read through all of this. It's a pretty well constructed argument by 26thmay, whereas matey boy Pancho goes for the David Brent approach by effectively saying...

Point one...FACT
Point two...FACT
Point three...FACT

Although, having read 26thmay's arguments, it is clear that matey boy is missing the point, wildly. As I said, how the resident advocate of 'poetic license' has the nerve to criticise anyone's factual analysis of a situation is beyond me.

Still, it was funny seeing him get so wound up! :lol:
so there two of you that live in fanasty land ..the IQ rate must be in double digits now.....

were in any of his posts ...just one FACT.....no thought not..so if you find one please link it..otherwise we can assume you have credibilty either

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

stearmaster wrote:
Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote: Oh you're right, I've just seen that everything you've said is so accurate, I just can't believe I questioned anything you said. You're wasted in IT, you should do something that uses your finely honed skills of analysis and advocacy more effectively.

Suggestions for what Pancho could do instead anybody?
were is your counter arguement...still waiting :roll:

all I see is someone squirming to come up with any FACTS to back up his statement..and instead reverts to pseudo satire to try and shift the subject....
Just let me know next time you're in London and I'll arrange for you to sit down with my five-year old so she can read you the various posts. That should make it all clearer for you.

And the word isn't "pseudo satire", it's "sarcasm".

you have NO credibility and have demonstrated that you gather your opinions from ABU myths ....all I asked for was ONE FACT..and you couldnt provide one...

FACT: YOUR A c**t!!!!

now now ...mummy will be home soon ..so youd better get your homework done..anyway I thought you wernt going to respond to my posts again... :wink:

User avatar
stearmaster
Posts: 5367
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: ENFIELD, N.LONDON

Post by stearmaster »

Pancho wrote:
tonysaunders wrote:For some reason, unbeknownst to me, I've just read through all of this. It's a pretty well constructed argument by 26thmay, whereas matey boy Pancho goes for the David Brent approach by effectively saying...

Point one...FACT
Point two...FACT
Point three...FACT

Although, having read 26thmay's arguments, it is clear that matey boy is missing the point, wildly. As I said, how the resident advocate of 'poetic license' has the nerve to criticise anyone's factual analysis of a situation is beyond me.

Still, it was funny seeing him get so wound up! :lol:
so there two of you that live in fanasty land ..the IQ rate must be in double digits now.....

were in any of his posts ...just one FACT.....no thought not..so if you find one please link it..otherwise we can assume you have credibilty either
i posted a FACT :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
T.S
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by T.S »

I thought you were off to lunch, son?

Here's a couple of questions I have for you, seeing as you're so obsessed with us that you're missing your lunch...

1. What makes you so credible? Nearly all the 'facts' you state on here get disproved, and then it's put down to 'poetic license'. Where do you get off questioning anyone's factual analysis of a situation.

2. Why, oh why are you getting so wound up about this?!

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

stearmaster wrote:
Pancho wrote:
tonysaunders wrote:For some reason, unbeknownst to me, I've just read through all of this. It's a pretty well constructed argument by 26thmay, whereas matey boy Pancho goes for the David Brent approach by effectively saying...

Point one...FACT
Point two...FACT
Point three...FACT

Although, having read 26thmay's arguments, it is clear that matey boy is missing the point, wildly. As I said, how the resident advocate of 'poetic license' has the nerve to criticise anyone's factual analysis of a situation is beyond me.

Still, it was funny seeing him get so wound up! :lol:
so there two of you that live in fanasty land ..the IQ rate must be in double digits now.....

were in any of his posts ...just one FACT.....no thought not..so if you find one please link it..otherwise we can assume you have credibilty either
i posted a FACT :lol: :lol: :lol:
I thought you were ignoring me...?

User avatar
Gimp_mask
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:28 pm
Location: North east London

Post by Gimp_mask »

AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!

26may1989
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:31 am

Post by 26may1989 »

Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot

26may1989
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:31 am

Post by 26may1989 »

Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot
You mean I have no credibility amongst myopic, illiterate United fans? Oh shit, how will I cope?

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot
You mean I have no credibility amongst myopic, illiterate United fans? Oh shit, how will I cope?

well come on then ..you have all these people awaiting you to embarras me..just one fact thats all just one ..heres your chance......nope thought not

User avatar
Red Gunner
Posts: 5778
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: London

Post by Red Gunner »

Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot
Nobody can prove you wrong, Pancho :wink: Man Utd are the greatest club in the world. Why bother being on a small club's forum? When you can go to a Man Utd one? Just go, mate. Your club is great and everything :wink:

Image

User avatar
Pancho
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Post by Pancho »

khalid_red wrote:
Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
Gimp_mask wrote:AC Milan 3-0 Manure

AC Milan 0-2 Arsenal (it could easily have been 0-5)

manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot
Nobody can prove you wrong, Pancho :wink: Man Utd are the greatest club in the world. Why bother being on a small club's forum? When you can go to a Man Utd one? Just go, mate. Your club is great and everything :wink:

Image

you hate me sooo much you respond to all my posts.....ermmmI think your secretly carrying a torch arent you?....

26may1989
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:31 am

Post by 26may1989 »

Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
26may1989 wrote:
Pancho wrote:
manutd 4 arsenal 0...champions!!!
At last, you got something right. Well done.
still waiting for you to mprove me wrong ...I have looked through your previuos posts and not once can you demonstrate ONE FACT ..not one...your credibility is shot
You mean I have no credibility amongst myopic, illiterate United fans? Oh shit, how will I cope?

well come on then ..you have all these people awaiting you to embarras me..just one fact thats all just one ..heres your chance......nope thought not
Seriously, Pancho, as I've said before, I think it's good for you to come on this site and exchange a bit of banter, and it was good of you to start the "well done last night" thread. But why have you got so wound up about this Keane/Haaland thing? It's all history, you do realise that?

User avatar
Gimp_mask
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:28 pm
Location: North east London

Post by Gimp_mask »

Pancho - please refer to current premier league table.

Post Reply