FA Cup Time.

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:01 pm

SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
Peeman wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:Is that a 3 match ban for straight red card just wondering i have him in my fantasy football team

Think it might be 4 coz he'll get an extra game coz he's already been red carded this season

But def 3 for straight red for dangerous play
If the initial red card was for violent conduct and he had a three match ban then it carries an extra game with it should he go once more for violent conduct. If the initial red was two bookings then there will not be an additional game.

Not sure i believe you sammy you have previous for spreading rumours with no foundation

1989 · Post by **1989** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:03 pm

If you go in two footed it doesn't matter if you win the ball. Correct decision from Foy.

Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:04 pm

mcdowell42 wrote:
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
Peeman wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:Is that a 3 match ban for straight red card just wondering i have him in my fantasy football team

Think it might be 4 coz he'll get an extra game coz he's already been red carded this season

But def 3 for straight red for dangerous play
If the initial red card was for violent conduct and he had a three match ban then it carries an extra game with it should he go once more for violent conduct. If the initial red was two bookings then there will not be an additional game.
Not sure i believe you sammy you have previous for spreading rumours with no foundation

mate transfer rumours are after all rumours....

But seriously that is the the ruling for red cards

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:05 pm

SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
Peeman wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:Is that a 3 match ban for straight red card just wondering i have him in my fantasy football team

Think it might be 4 coz he'll get an extra game coz he's already been red carded this season

But def 3 for straight red for dangerous play
If the initial red card was for violent conduct and he had a three match ban then it carries an extra game with it should he go once more for violent conduct. If the initial red was two bookings then there will not be an additional game.
Not sure i believe you sammy you have previous for spreading rumours with no foundation
mate transfer rumours are after all rumours....

But seriously that is the the ruling for red cards

Slowly back-peddling i see

Percy Dalton · Post by **Percy Dalton** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:08 pm

I see the buck-toothed lesbian is anonymous again!

1989 · Post by **1989** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:09 pm

Mancini switching to a 3 man defense formation. What would Wenger do in this situation?

Kolarov scores 1-3

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:10 pm

LDB wrote:
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:
SammyDroppedHisShorts wrote:
Peeman wrote:
Think it might be 4 coz he'll get an extra game coz he's already been red carded this season

But def 3 for straight red for dangerous play
If the initial red card was for violent conduct and he had a three match ban then it carries an extra game with it should he go once more for violent conduct. If the initial red was two bookings then there will not be an additional game.
Not sure i believe you sammy you have previous for spreading rumours with no foundation
mate transfer rumours are after all rumours....

But seriously that is the the ruling for red cards
Slowly back-peddling i see

My sentiment exactly

Percy Dalton · Post by **Percy Dalton** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:12 pm

1989 wrote:Mancini switching to a 3 man defense formation. What would Wenger do in this situation?

Probably abuse a plastic water bottle viciously!

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:14 pm

1989 wrote:Mancini switching to a 3 man defense formation. What would Wenger do in this situation?

Kolarov scores 1-3

He'd take off a defensive midfielder and give a young winger his first team debut. Arsene knows

Watson · Post by **Watson** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:19 pm

1989 wrote:If you go in two footed it doesn't matter if you win the ball. Correct decision from Foy.

My facebook wall has been up in arms about this decision, but I don't see why, your absolutely right.

Post by **Chippy** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:22 pm

Isn't it red for something like reckless and aggressive?

donaldo · Post by **donaldo** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:24 pm

topgoon wrote:
For just the FA cup, bring back 3 pm kick offs for at least the 3rd round and give the winner a place in champs league qualifying. If the winner's already in the top 3, then the loser does a play-off with the 4th placed team for a champs league qualifying round. If the loser is 4th then play-off with the 5th best team.

The coportaes get extra TV money, the TV bosses get more crucial games in late May and the cup will take on more credence for all teams.

No way to win the FA cup you need to win 6 games.I heard some say give the Europa league winners a CL spot to make teams take it seriously.No the CL places has to go to teams who perform over 38 games

And if it was just the top 3 how would we ever qualify

1989 · Post by **1989** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:28 pm

Mancini's tactics working wonders. Class manager.

corkbarry · Post by **corkbarry** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:38 pm

Nani is a World class diver,If he did not see it as a foul it can't have been!

Watson · Post by **Watson** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:41 pm

Demun210 wrote:It was a controlled tackle....if the referee hadn't stopped the play you wouldn't have heard another word about it after the game.

That's beside the point, he did stop play and made the correct decision.