
Saggy chops trial
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: London
Here we are two weeks of refreshing updates .
http://www.guardian.co.uk/twitter/list/ ... knappTrial
http://www.guardian.co.uk/twitter/list/ ... knappTrial
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62224
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Prosecution say the payments of $295,000 were "bungs or offshore bonuses which parties had no intention of declaring for tax"
What do you think the slimey toad will say in respect to receiving the bung/bonus ?
Also , Scum fans are pretending not to care and are hoping he does get done so he won't be offered Engerland job. Surely Levy (Gollum) will have to sack him (re GG)?
What do you think the slimey toad will say in respect to receiving the bung/bonus ?
Also , Scum fans are pretending not to care and are hoping he does get done so he won't be offered Engerland job. Surely Levy (Gollum) will have to sack him (re GG)?
- I Hate Hleb
- Posts: 18632
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
- Location: London
"Well it was a triffic offer, from a triffic bloke who thought I was doing a triffic job. Only a mug would want to offend someone by turning down his triffic show of appreciation and generous offer - which was triffic - so I didn't."Macca wrote:Prosecution say the payments of $295,000 were "bungs or offshore bonuses which parties had no intention of declaring for tax"
What do you think the slimey toad will say in respect to receiving the bung/bonus ?
Also , Scum fans are pretending not to care and are hoping he does get done so he won't be offered Engerland job. Surely Levy (Gollum) will have to sack him (re GG)?
- SpanishJoe
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:39 pm
- Location: granada, spain
It was interesting listening to the evidence already submitted.
It would appear that there is concrete evidence that:
a) Money was paid from Mandaric to 'Arry and
b) It wasn't declared to the tax authorities
Given that ignorance of the law is no defence I'm intrigued to see what defence they use. Try to blame poor accountancy advice? The 'I was just about to declare it' defence? The 'I never bothered to declare all the other bungs I received and Mark Hughes and Big Sam told me they didn't declare theirs (alledgedly)'? I suspect their best chance is to try and make their defence as complicated as possible so that (as legal history has consistently shown) the jury gets baffled and acquit. Being celebrities (ask Stevie 'I chased him with all my mates and kicked the shit out of him in self-defence' G) is sure to help.
Let's just hope there's a few Gooners on the jury.
Apparently 'Arry used his dog's name for the name of the Monaco account. Anybody know the dog's name?
It would appear that there is concrete evidence that:
a) Money was paid from Mandaric to 'Arry and
b) It wasn't declared to the tax authorities
Given that ignorance of the law is no defence I'm intrigued to see what defence they use. Try to blame poor accountancy advice? The 'I was just about to declare it' defence? The 'I never bothered to declare all the other bungs I received and Mark Hughes and Big Sam told me they didn't declare theirs (alledgedly)'? I suspect their best chance is to try and make their defence as complicated as possible so that (as legal history has consistently shown) the jury gets baffled and acquit. Being celebrities (ask Stevie 'I chased him with all my mates and kicked the shit out of him in self-defence' G) is sure to help.
Let's just hope there's a few Gooners on the jury.
Apparently 'Arry used his dog's name for the name of the Monaco account. Anybody know the dog's name?
-
- Posts: 18407
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
SpanishJoe wrote:It was interesting listening to the evidence already submitted.
It would appear that there is concrete evidence that:
a) Money was paid from Mandaric to 'Arry and
b) It wasn't declared to the tax authorities
Given that ignorance of the law is no defence I'm intrigued to see what defence they use. Try to blame poor accountancy advice? The 'I was just about to declare it' defence? The 'I never bothered to declare all the other bungs I received and Mark Hughes and Big Sam told me they didn't declare theirs (alledgedly)'? I suspect their best chance is to try and make their defence as complicated as possible so that (as legal history has consistently shown) the jury gets baffled and acquit. Being celebrities (ask Stevie 'I chased him with all my mates and kicked the shit out of him in self-defence' G) is sure to help.
Let's just hope there's a few Gooners on the jury.
Apparently 'Arry used his dog's name for the name of the Monaco account. Anybody know the dog's name?
Rosie
- franksav63
- Posts: 14520
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
- Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
- Contact:
More like Sandra...mcdowell42 wrote:SpanishJoe wrote:It was interesting listening to the evidence already submitted.
It would appear that there is concrete evidence that:
a) Money was paid from Mandaric to 'Arry and
b) It wasn't declared to the tax authorities
Given that ignorance of the law is no defence I'm intrigued to see what defence they use. Try to blame poor accountancy advice? The 'I was just about to declare it' defence? The 'I never bothered to declare all the other bungs I received and Mark Hughes and Big Sam told me they didn't declare theirs (alledgedly)'? I suspect their best chance is to try and make their defence as complicated as possible so that (as legal history has consistently shown) the jury gets baffled and acquit. Being celebrities (ask Stevie 'I chased him with all my mates and kicked the shit out of him in self-defence' G) is sure to help.
Let's just hope there's a few Gooners on the jury.
Apparently 'Arry used his dog's name for the name of the Monaco account. Anybody know the dog's name?
Rosie
franksav63 wrote:More like Sandra...mcdowell42 wrote:SpanishJoe wrote:It was interesting listening to the evidence already submitted.
It would appear that there is concrete evidence that:
a) Money was paid from Mandaric to 'Arry and
b) It wasn't declared to the tax authorities
Given that ignorance of the law is no defence I'm intrigued to see what defence they use. Try to blame poor accountancy advice? The 'I was just about to declare it' defence? The 'I never bothered to declare all the other bungs I received and Mark Hughes and Big Sam told me they didn't declare theirs (alledgedly)'? I suspect their best chance is to try and make their defence as complicated as possible so that (as legal history has consistently shown) the jury gets baffled and acquit. Being celebrities (ask Stevie 'I chased him with all my mates and kicked the shit out of him in self-defence' G) is sure to help.
Let's just hope there's a few Gooners on the jury.
Apparently 'Arry used his dog's name for the name of the Monaco account. Anybody know the dog's name?
Rosie

Full of crackers tonight Frank.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:26 pm
- Location: Biggleswade