Glasgow Rangers

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Clash
Posts: 2991
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:46 pm

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by Clash »

I Hate Hleb wrote:

Yeah but that's because most of them are on the fecking dole and don't have work commitments!! :lol: :lol: :wink:
:D :D

Glasgow needs to be twinned with Liverpool !

skizz_b
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:26 pm
Location: LDN

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by skizz_b »

Clash wrote: Fair play to you there mate, you make some good points and have backed them up.

Im not sure I'd take those stats too seriously (anything that claims Chelsea have 135m fans is hard accept - or maybe I dont want to accept it :? ) . I prefer to judge a big club by the amount of support that attends matches instead of a global figure whcih could just involve someone owning a beer mat. That doesnt mean I'm right to do judge it like that though.

The Rangers thing I think you have proved. Wrongly I think I assumed they had a similar sized support to Celtic but clearly not. I wouldnt have a problem accepting Celtic as a bigger club than Arsenal though. I remember they played a European game in the mid 80s at Parkhead which they won but a bottle was thrown on the pitch. UEFA made them replay the game at Old Trafford. They managed to fill the ground. I dont think Arsenal would have done that back then or now.
I think the difference is that they did a cross section of 1000 people per country so not sure of the accuracy. Doubtful that Chelsea have a bigger fanbase than Arsenal (consistently third/fourth across most surveys) but I don't think anyone actually ASKS about celtic so very difficult to get figures!

User avatar
augie
Posts: 31003
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by augie »

northbank123 wrote:Does anybody actually want them in the PL? And why? The novelty of having two new away trips would wear off when fans are expected to fuck off to that dump twice every year (at least). Who really gives a fuck about seeing whether or not Celtic or Rangers would compete with more money? I'd rather see Hadrian's Wall rebuilt in its entirety than let those two in the PL. And you might think that the rest of Scottish football is dire as it is but take the only two clubs with appeal out and it'll become worse than Welsh football. I've been to Edinburgh quite a few times over the last few years and for every person you can see wearing Hearts/Hibs merchandise there are at least 4 or 5 with Celtic/Rangers tops on.


I'm guessing that if there was a reason why some fans would want them in, and I doubt if many do, but the crowds and atmosphere might be the main reason. We have all heard and agreed with fellow Gooners expressing happiness that the likes of blackburn were relegated partially on the basis that they only bring about two dozen fans to the grove :roll: What you have here is two proper big clubs (in terms of fanbase) and the atmosphere at those games would be electric 8) Anyway as I have said previously, I dont see it happening and am just playing devils advocate really

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by northbank123 »

augie wrote:
northbank123 wrote:Does anybody actually want them in the PL? And why? The novelty of having two new away trips would wear off when fans are expected to fuck off to that dump twice every year (at least). Who really gives a fuck about seeing whether or not Celtic or Rangers would compete with more money? I'd rather see Hadrian's Wall rebuilt in its entirety than let those two in the PL. And you might think that the rest of Scottish football is dire as it is but take the only two clubs with appeal out and it'll become worse than Welsh football. I've been to Edinburgh quite a few times over the last few years and for every person you can see wearing Hearts/Hibs merchandise there are at least 4 or 5 with Celtic/Rangers tops on.


I'm guessing that if there was a reason why some fans would want them in, and I doubt if many do, but the crowds and atmosphere might be the main reason. We have all heard and agreed with fellow Gooners expressing happiness that the likes of blackburn were relegated partially on the basis that they only bring about two dozen fans to the grove :roll: What you have here is two proper big clubs (in terms of fanbase) and the atmosphere at those games would be electric 8) Anyway as I have said previously, I dont see it happening and am just playing devils advocate really
Fair point, would certainly bring a better support than any of our friends from the North-West. Think the novelty would wear out after a while though and just no need for it in my view.

User avatar
SWLGooner
Posts: 10483
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by SWLGooner »

Clash wrote:
skizz_b wrote:
Sorry, thought you were referring to the 2000 final. I know a fair few people who were loath to go because of the rumoured attendance of other "firms".

Either way this whole argument comes down to what people's definition of a "big club" is. I prefer stats, so to attempt to sort this -

Research by Germany company SPORT+MARKT has revealed an estimation of how many supporters each club has around the world. A sample of 1,000 people from 34 countries has revealed the top 13 football teams with the most fans.

1 Manchester United (354m)
2 Barcelona (270m)
3 Real Madrid (174m)
4 Chelsea (135m)
5 Arsenal (113m)
6 AC Milan (99m)
7 Liverpool (71m)
8 Inter Milan (49m)
9 Bayern Munich (24m)
10 Juventus (20m)

Not even in the top 13 - Man City, the Scum and Newcastle filled those positions.

Or alternatively, let former Rangers director Hugh Adam take it away:
"Rangers' so called global appeal is a myth. When I was there, we did an exercise which involved asking 50,000 fans on the database to recommend a friend or a relative abroad.

"A big response was expected - some were even talking about getting 100,000 names - because everybody in Scotland seems to know somebody abroad.

"We got back 2,800 names and three-quarters of them didn’t know they had been nominated. It’s no surprise that Celtic are officially the best-supported football club in North America, with more official clubs than anybody else. The difference is the Irish connection.

"Many Irish people may support Manchester United, Liverpool or whoever, but they all - every one of them - have an affection for Celtic. And, of course, Celtic also have a great Scottish following.

"The difference is that, while the Irish all have an allegiance to Parkhead, there are millions of Scots who not only don’t support Rangers, but actively dislike them.

"Despite the claims of international appeal, Rangers are, essentially, a West of Scotland club. They talk of supporters’ buses leaving from all parts of Scotland, but if you look closely, you’ll see there aren’t many from each area and they are not all full."
:wink:
Fair play to you there mate, you make some good points and have backed them up.

Im not sure I'd take those stats too seriously (anything that claims Chelsea have 135m fans is hard accept - or maybe I dont want to accept it :? ) . I prefer to judge a big club by the amount of support that attends matches instead of a global figure whcih could just involve someone owning a beer mat. That doesnt mean I'm right to do judge it like that though.
Chelsea have a depressingly large proportion of the African and American fanbase, in my experience. Nowhere near us, United or Liverpool globally (in Southern & Eastern Africa, Chelsea are bigger than them in West Africa and the US).

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 4841
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by the playing mantis »

surely celtic are a far bigger club than rangers anyway, cos of the catholic thing? in my travels it appears that catholics when in minorities like to have something to show that they are different, and 'support' (i use that term very loosely) of celtic is pretty much that. protestants being the maj in most english speaking countires, barring the emerald isle dont need/want this uniqueness so see no need to support rangers (when it comes to those of irish/scots origin)

the above is not meant in a negative way as all minorites want tos how there uniqeness (when in the usa i often wander around in an england cricket team 'vest', to show my difference. i may have looked a bit of a knob but it was a celebration of being something apart from the rest. i imagine its the same with catholics and celtic.

likewise i cant imagine many irish/scots origins catholics ex pats in predominatly catholic countries being too bothered about supporting celtic.

rangers are a much smaller club than us, especially in terms of fanbase. id say celtic may be on a similar level to us, in the english speaking world, but bring in asia, africa, most of europe they are tiny.

if rangers and celtic were in the pl sure thay should be top 8 clubs with the size of their fan bases and tv money. but then again villa should be and arnt. likewise, i have no idea so correct me if im wrong, id guess its much much cheaper to get into parkhead or ibrox than it is the big pl teams, so is ticket revenue all its cracked up to be for them, despite the fact they sell out?


who wants them anyway, piss head scummy sweaties, persoanally dont lime the accent and dont wan them.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 31003
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by augie »

We all know that fans of both clubs are entrenched their religous bigotry but it seems to be totally overlooked that Glasgow Celtic the club is not and never has been that way - many of celtic's best ever players were protestant (daglish for example) and it was only rangers that refused to sign catholics and that only changed when souness took charge 8)

I'm not really a religous guy tbh (II go once a year on xmas day and that is only for the kids :oops: ) but do you really believe that catholic religon is a minority religon ? :shock:

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by MK Gould »

Clash wrote:
Almunia is a clown wrote:Celtic got 14,399 in a home League Cup quarter final a few weeks back. Arsenal always get much higher gates at home league cup ties usually close to capacity.

No way are the Glasgow pair of bigots bigger than Arsenal nor Liverpool worldwide.
Bit selective there mate :)

Celtic may have got less than 15,000 for a cup game but they also took 80,000 fans to Seville a few seasons back for a UEFA cup final. Rangers reportedly took 200,000 to Manchester when they got to a final there not so long ago.

Compare that to the 17,000 or so that Arsenal took to both their finals in Copenhagen and its hard to argue that given the same circumstances both Rangers and Celtic wouldnt be be bigger than us both domestically and worldwide. They are more than just football clubs, they represent something wider.
Don't know the official numbers but I'd be amazed if we had less than 25,000 out of the 34,000 crowd in Copenhagen in 1994. And I think we took something like 50-60,000 to Paris in 2006.

I don't think 200,000 pissed up jocks in Manchester is necessarily evidence of a bigger support base.....To be honest, if you lived in Glasgow and only had trips to Dundee, Aberdeen and Forfar to look forward to then you would also be desperate for a chance to visit south of the border.

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 7878
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by StuartL »

augie wrote:We all know that fans of both clubs are entrenched their religous bigotry but it seems to be totally overlooked that Glasgow Celtic the club is not and never has been that way - many of celtic's best ever players were protestant (daglish for example) and it was only rangers that refused to sign catholics and that only changed when souness took charge 8)

I'm not really a religous guy tbh (II go once a year on xmas day and that is only for the kids :oops: ) but do you really believe that catholic religon is a minority religon ? :shock:
do you get to pick one out, or do they come giftwrapped ?

Top Londoner
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:35 pm
Location: Taser the cuunt

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by Top Londoner »

Clash wrote:
I Hate Hleb wrote:

Yeah but that's because most of them are on the fecking dole and don't have work commitments!! :lol: :lol: :wink:
:D :D

Glasgow needs to be twinned with Liverpool !


Don't forget Rochdale, Oldham, Burnley...................fuck, let's just say Lancashire, Greater Manchester and the north in general. :lol:

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by I Hate Hleb »

StuartL wrote:
augie wrote:We all know that fans of both clubs are entrenched their religous bigotry but it seems to be totally overlooked that Glasgow Celtic the club is not and never has been that way - many of celtic's best ever players were protestant (daglish for example) and it was only rangers that refused to sign catholics and that only changed when souness took charge 8)

I'm not really a religous guy tbh (II go once a year on xmas day and that is only for the kids :oops: ) but do you really believe that catholic religon is a minority religon ? :shock:
do you get to pick one out, or do they come giftwrapped ?
:coffeespit: :coffeespit: :coffeespit:

All together now....

Bald Jimmy Saville
You're just a bald Jimmy Saville
Bald Jimmy Saville
You're just a bald Jimmy Saville!!


:wink: :lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
SWLGooner
Posts: 10483
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by SWLGooner »

augie wrote: I'm not really a religous guy tbh (II go once a year on xmas day and that is only for the kids :oops: ) but do you really believe that catholic religon is a minority religon ? :shock:
If you reread it I think TPM is referring to Catholics in countries where they form a minority, not in general :?:

Almunia is a clown
Posts: 972
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Gooner Valley N719 EIE

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by Almunia is a clown »

[quote="]And I think we took something like 50-60,000 to Paris in 2006.
[/quote]

Do you realise how many Arsenal fans in Paris didn't have tickets? Whatever got into the stadium was easily dwarfed by those that didn't. I live in N7 area & out of 50 or more local fans that I knew that went only 3 had tickets, whole families went to Paris, most without no chance of admission. Many went nowhere near the stadium & stayed in the centre of town.

Whatever Arsenal's support was inside the ground, there was that much traveled without tickets plus another quarter to half besides :barscarf:

User avatar
Herd
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:00 am

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by Herd »

Both the huns and the celts have massive support for one off games ,but I bet you their support would dwindle when they had to pay premier league admission prices and face long away trips every week !

As for saying that worldwide rangers are bigger than us ,well not in asia where the only rangers is QPR who are growing in support because of air asia ,the glasgow rangers supporters club in Sing has about 30 members tops, ours has over 250 !
Liverpool are by far the biggest in Asia with MUFC a close second ,we are a distant but important 3rd but have the largest official Supporters club and attendance in Singapore .
Apart from a few girly bars in pattaya Chelsea hardly register out here likewise Man shitty !
Leeds are still supported here and the barcodes have a few too .
Real Madrid and Barca arte very big here too and theres a smattering of AC MIlan .

User avatar
Natural Born Gooner
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Taking aim, ready to FIRE!

Re: Glasgow Rangers

Post by Natural Born Gooner »

I Hate Hleb wrote:
StuartL wrote:
augie wrote:We all know that fans of both clubs are entrenched their religous bigotry but it seems to be totally overlooked that Glasgow Celtic the club is not and never has been that way - many of celtic's best ever players were protestant (daglish for example) and it was only rangers that refused to sign catholics and that only changed when souness took charge 8)

I'm not really a religous guy tbh (II go once a year on xmas day and that is only for the kids :oops: ) but do you really believe that catholic religon is a minority religon ? :shock:
do you get to pick one out, or do they come giftwrapped ?
:coffeespit: :coffeespit: :coffeespit:

All together now....

Bald Jimmy Saville
You're just a bald Jimmy Saville
Bald Jimmy Saville
You're just a bald Jimmy Saville!!


:wink: :lol: :lol: :wink:
Image

Post Reply