Looking back at that side it had some pretty decent players. Its certainly not clear to me that the present crop are much better. Have a look at the squads and make your mind up - which team did you think was the better of the two
Our current first choice XI seems to be Chesney, Sanga, Gibbs, Mertesacker, Vermaelen/Koscielny, Arteta, Wilshere, Cazorla, Podolski, Giroud, Walcott (arguably)
The players who played the most games in a 4-4-2 back then were: Seaman, Dixon, Winterburn, Adams, Bould, Schwarz, Parlour, Merson, Jensen, Wright, Campbell
I don't think there can be any doubt over the choice of keeper and the back line. There's a case for Sagna and Chesney but I'd go for Dixon and Seaman above them every time. The midfield has definitely improved although if we wanted a hard running, workhorse out wide Parlour is better than anything we've currently got doing that job. Up front Wrighty would walk into this side - the problem being Kevin Campbell who scored only 5 goals. I look at the back-up strikers they had then like John Hartson and he's certainly better than whatever we've got in reserve these days
I remembered that 94/95 team for the shit midfield players GG brought in like Carter, McGoldrick, Hillier, Morrow etc but they weren't first choices.
There's not much in it is there? We had a better back 5 and CF back then and a better midfield now. Roll on 12th place and a new boss in February.....if we can only persuade Lord Wenger to take a backhander signing some shit Scandinavian midfielders
