As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:We'd never play to his strengths but quality-wise Jelavic looks like he'd walk into our starting line-up.
Ahead of the "he puts in a good shift" imposter that cost double the amount?
Can't believe that.....
I'm starting to think you have a few doubts about Giroud's ability.
On the contrary - I have absolutely no doubt about his abilities whatsoever
Personally I don't think he's as bad as you do, although the jury's still out as to how good/bad he'll likely turn out to be. But there's simply no denying we could have bought better for the same outlay, or even less. Another nail in the if-only-wenger-had-money coffin.
N1Goon wrote:Giroud is just as shit as Gervinho. If Giroud was African and had been here a year already he'd be getting exactly the same treatment, mark my words.
Gervinho, at least, can dribble (at times?) and has pace, a necessary trait for a forward. Both are hopelessly shit, however.
Everton have three strikers that would walk into our first 11, Jelavic, Mirallas and Fellaini.
Sadly, i'd take those 3 over Podolski, Giroud and Gervinho any day.
giroot and the klingon cost around 23m the everton front3 cost 27m i think.Arsole knows though hes been in the game for 30yrs