fair point, agree with that.northbank123 wrote:Skizz that gives a better picture of the circumstances but there was still absolutely nothing compelling her to sell other than the greed. As a director of the club she owed a fiduciary duty to act in its best interests, so claiming she was 'duped' is an easy way out when in reality everybody could see by looking at his other sports ventures what his intentions and priorities were going to be. Particularly when she was part of the 'lock-down agreement'.
Fact is, however she tries to dress it up, she got greedy and sold the shares she inherited through marriage because she had dollar signs in her eyes. She's been quite mouthy since she left and it's quite obvious to me that she misses the platform from which she can air her views.
She was a custodian of our club and just like her pals she sold us down the river for personal wealth she neither needs or deserves. So it does stick in the craw a bit when she turns round and comes out with this.
The Lady Has Spoken
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
-
georgeknows89
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:42 am
- Location: Herts
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
the lady has spoken ....because
she was apparently due some money on the loan notes on her shares sale and there is a very tight window in which this money can be paid but she missed the date period which means she has to wait another year UNLESS Stan agreed to still pay it but he remained silent ie said NO, which is why she has now thrown her toys out of the pram.
She like others sold to him not because he was the person of choice but because it was the ante Usmanov alternative .
she was apparently due some money on the loan notes on her shares sale and there is a very tight window in which this money can be paid but she missed the date period which means she has to wait another year UNLESS Stan agreed to still pay it but he remained silent ie said NO, which is why she has now thrown her toys out of the pram.
She like others sold to him not because he was the person of choice but because it was the ante Usmanov alternative .
-
OneBardGooner
- Posts: 48546
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
Top Londoner wrote:TeeCee wrote:She needs to take some advice before speaking again!! There are some people with agendas against Arsenal, the likes of Bracewell-Smith, Stewart Robson etc. Now they speak out when there's a good chance of people being on 'their side. We might agree with much of what they say but will they be taken seriously by most??
Heh. If only you heard what Fiszman's missus has to say, whilst sitting on her 16 inch Dildo
-
Arsenal Till I Die
- Posts: 5436
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:06 pm
- Location: North London
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
Someone should post a link of this to her Twitter feed. Maybe she'll be genuine enough to sign up here and explain herself........................................................................... 
-
brazilianGOONER
- Posts: 9208
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
- Location: i think we're parked, man
- Contact:
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
skizz_b wrote: i agree there's an element of choice in it but it's also easy to put pressure on people to make a favourable decision. unfortunately we'll never know exactly what happened. unless BG's short enough to hide in the next board meeting and feedback.
-
goonerwalker
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:09 pm
Re: The Lady Has Spoken
Arsenal Till I Die wrote:Someone should post a link of this to her Twitter feed. Maybe she'll be genuine enough to sign up here and explain herself...........................................................................
She'd have to do a hell of a lot of explaining to convince me what she did 'was in the best interests of the club' 
If she cared so much about the future of Arsenal herself and the way the club is run she would have kept her shares and directly influenced the club. And as has been pointed out, a little research of Kroenke's would have shown her he was only in it for the cash. 
