Natalie's bongo's were great again this year transfer thread

northbank123 · Post by **northbank123** » Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:59 pm

I would never sign anyone from United purely because Ferguson would rather die than sell us a player that might improve us, even though we're miles off competing with them.

BournemouthRED · Post by **BournemouthRED** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:14 am

Can't stand him, but it's not about liking players anymore is it!

Sign him up, he's better than forehead

kite · Post by **kite** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:40 am

g88ner wrote:
augie wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... um=twitter

I would rather give wally walnut £1m per week than for us to sign this cheating portugese nancy boy c**t Bear in mind this is coming from a guy that doesnt think walnut is worth 75k per week much less 100k per week
I'd happily have Nani. I reckon he's streets ahead of our other wide options. Whether his wages and/or price tag make that feasible is another matter altogether though.

But would a player playing for the biggest club in the world want to join a "wee club" from London

I thought he's still playing for Manchester United

1989 · Post by **1989** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:46 am

I'd take Nani in an instant.

Tonyb · Post by **Tonyb** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:28 am

If we wanted Nani surely we should have used him as a bargaining tool when we made it so hard for RVP to go to them!

franksav63 · Post by **franksav63** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:36 am

Tonyb wrote:If we wanted Nani surely we should have used him as a bargaining tool when we made it so hard for RVP to go to them!

That's just it though, we've never done this, even with the outgoing player deals we've done to Man City or Barca, the club just want cash on the hip, greedy, greedy *word censored*.

augie · Post by **augie** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:17 am

Tonyb wrote:If we wanted Nani surely we should have used him as a bargaining tool when we made it so hard for RVP to go to them!

And if we were gonna go that route then trying to sign Hernandez would make (a bit) more sense given that we don't play a system compatible with your traditional type of winger so the portugese c**t would freelance and leave our full backs even more exposed than they currently are

supergeorgegraham · Post by **supergeorgegraham** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:04 am

Im not keen on signing Nani because he already played in the Prem League with an average success rate. Why would he improve in a team worse than United. It makes no sense. We will still keep Gervinho and have Podolski and Ox. It will be a replacement signing for Walcott and Walcott is streets ahead of Nani so again WE LOSE.

markyp · Post by **markyp** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:39 pm

Nani would be a waste of space,hes average in a great side plus Fergie very rarely gets it wrong,if a player is sold by united its because they cant offer fuck all,why would we want a player not good enough for united,he'd only stuggle even further with us

markyp · Post by **markyp** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:11 pm

after watching Gibbs fall asleep yet again during the newcastle match we need Baines!!!!gibbs is a bloody liability, i dont care if he owes us something for bringing him through the youth ranks,he's a back up left back at best,he will cost us time and time again,now we've finally sorted the gk position out the weak link is left back, i bet Wenker will continue to let this be our achilles heel

Post by **QuartzGooner** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:15 pm

Yeah agree.

Been texting friends all game, saying we should splash out on Baines the money that is being touted as earmarked for Nani, and use Gibbs left midfield at times.

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:21 pm

Wenger refused to comment on whether he's interested in Ba but on Nani said he will not be signing anyone from Manchester United

Via Matt Law(sunday mirror) on twitter

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:04 pm

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ty-1510801

Heres an unusual transfer target

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:10 am

Arsenal in pole position to sign £5m-rated Southampton left-back Shaw

By Joe Bernstein

PUBLISHED:22:00 GMT, 29 December 2012| UPDATED: 23:17 GMT, 29 December 2012

.
.
It’s advantage Arsenal in the chase for £5million left-back Luke Shaw, a Premier League regular for Southampton at 17.

Arsene Wenger has signed Theo Walcott and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain from the club and will use that relationship to move for Shaw as Chelsea are also interested.

Wenger is looking to add to his options at left-back with Brazilian flop Andre Santos nearing the exit door and Kieran Gibbs' niggling injury problems continuing to interrupt his progress.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z2GUObIFjF
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

1989 · Post by **1989** » Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:32 am

mcdowell42 wrote:Wenger refused to comment on whether he's interested in Ba but on Nani said he will not be signing anyone from Manchester United

Via Matt Law(sunday mirror) on twitter

If only he wouldn't sell anyone to them as well, the clown.

Natalie's bongo's were great again this year transfer thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread

Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread