Arsene's Worst Signings

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by g88ner »

VoiceOfReason wrote:
spendsum4uckingmoney wrote:That article was fucking atrocious. As bad as Vela was we made a profit. Eduardo was a fantastic player. Not his fault the Prem has fucking awful defenders. Bendtner scored quite a few of the bench.

Worst for me are:

Jeffers
Wright
Van Bronckhorst
Cygan
Reyes
Senderos
Diaby
Gervinho
Squillachi
Santos
Senderos gets very unfairly slated by Arsenal fans. Yes, Drogba ran rings around him - as he did to many other defenders - but there were times when he was excellent (namely the 2005 FA Cup Final, in which he played a blinder).

In 2005, he came third in the Arsenal.com fans' player of the season poll - no mean feat, considering that Henry, Bergkamp, Vieira, Pires, Ljungberg, Fabregas etc. were all at the club. He also won the fans' player of the month award for April 2005.

Although he was never the sharpest knife in the draw, he was an honest professional and always gave 100% - none of this bling, prima donna bullshit that currently infests the PL. Like Ray Parlour, I'd always prefer a solid hard-worker dedicated to the cause than a technically-gifted player who couldn't give a shit (like Arshavin).

Ultimately, he didn't fulfil his initial potential, and probably wasn't quite good enough to fill the boots of the likes of Tony Adams, Martin Keown and Sol Campbell. But one of the worst AW signings of all time? Nah, I'm just not having it.
I like that post 8)

I really wanted Senderos to succeed, as you could tell how much he wanted it. Oh well.

markyp
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:54 pm
Location: location location

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by markyp »

as far as i can remember the 05/06 season senderos was really starting to develop into a decent player,then came the world cup,a bash on the nose during one of the games and he was never the same player(or am i deluded?)

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22160
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by SteveO 35 »

N1Goon wrote:Going to put an early shout in for Giroud for this thread.

Howard Webb has more pace then Giroud.
He was fucking desperate yesterday. I was watching to see if I could see this mythical 'good shift' nonsense suddenly become a reality but if that means chasing down the odd no-chance ball through to the oppo GK at the expense of any quality whatsoever then stick it where the sun don't shine. No pace, always falling over, weak as the beer on sale at the bowl (criminal that we have players like him and the UFG at their height with no physical quality whatsoever) and shite in front of goal. How the fuck did he not manage to get that header on target. The guy is fucking shit

Not bad enough to be one of Wenger's worst - he's already surpassed the likes of Jeffers - but he's going to be a memorable signing for all the wrong reasons I'm afraid.

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by QuartzGooner »

VoiceOfReason wrote:
Senderos gets very unfairly slated by Arsenal fans.
Although he was never the sharpest knife in the draw, he was an honest professional and always gave 100%
Met him twice. Seemed like an intelligent bloke to me.

Would be a good player for most of game, but prone to making a high profile mistake that would stick in the memory, rather than an all round bad player.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by northbank123 »

QuartzGooner wrote:
VoiceOfReason wrote:
Senderos gets very unfairly slated by Arsenal fans.
Although he was never the sharpest knife in the draw, he was an honest professional and always gave 100%
Met him twice. Seemed like an intelligent bloke to me.

Would be a good player for most of game, but prone to making a high profile mistake that would stick in the memory, rather than an all round bad player.
Doesn't he speak 5 or 6 languages?

Didn't he keep Campbell out the team for the 2005 FA Cup final too?

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by I Hate Hleb »

SteveO 35 wrote:
N1Goon wrote:Going to put an early shout in for Giroud for this thread.

Howard Webb has more pace then Giroud.
He was fucking desperate yesterday. I was watching to see if I could see this mythical 'good shift' nonsense suddenly become a reality but if that means chasing down the odd no-chance ball through to the oppo GK at the expense of any quality whatsoever then stick it where the sun don't shine. No pace, always falling over, weak as the beer on sale at the bowl (criminal that we have players like him and the UFG at their height with no physical quality whatsoever) and shite in front of goal. How the fuck did he not manage to get that header on target. The guy is fucking shit

Not bad enough to be one of Wenger's worst - he's already surpassed the likes of Jeffers - but he's going to be a memorable signing for all the wrong reasons I'm afraid.
Not sure if you noticed SteveO but the article on the main website today mentions you and the nickname you gave Giroud in passing (although not by name). :barscarf: Hope you trade-marked it as it's sure to become famous the world over whenever people are describing our French striker...

http://www.onlinegooner.com/article.php ... ve&id=2848

:lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22160
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by SteveO 35 »

Le Chapman immortalised !

We can't be far away from a Lee Chapman vs Le Chapman poll?

I think 'Le' wins the best tattoos, whilst Lee's 80's flowing blond locks and the stylish green and blue kit levels it up.

On the field they're both as fucking hopeless as each other. Honestly, what with the Swansea PA system belting out some historic Swansea City song about silver swans or something, the German Willie Young showing his usual grace for their first goal, Giroud's Chapmanesque touch, and a visit to Swansea market, I was thinking of contacting the BBC for a new series of Life on Mars.

Opening line - "my name's SteveO. I had an accident and when I woke up it was 1982. I need to get back to 2013 to see if Arsene's contract gets extended"

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62238
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by DB10GOONER »

SteveO 35 wrote:Le Chapman immortalised !

We can't be far away from a Lee Chapman vs Le Chapman poll?

I think 'Le' wins the best tattoos, whilst Lee's 80's flowing blond locks and the stylish green and blue kit levels it up.

On the field they're both as fucking hopeless as each other. Honestly, what with the Swansea PA system belting out some historic Swansea City song about silver swans or something, the German Willie Young showing his usual grace for their first goal, Giroud's Chapmanesque touch, and a visit to Swansea market, I was thinking of contacting the BBC for a new series of Life on Mars.

Opening line - "my name's SteveO. I had an accident and when I woke up it was 1982. I need to get back to 2013 to see if Arsene's contract gets extended"
You know SteveO, you have to live with the fact that Giroud has actually contributed more to The Arsenal cause in his HALF A SEASON with us than your beloved Diaby has in the last 3 years! :lol: At it's most basic he has scored as many goals in a HALF SEASON as Diaby has managed in the last 3 and a half seasons and made nearly as many appearances in HALF A SEASON as Diaby has in the last 2 and a half seasons!!

Sure, one's a striker and one is an attacking midfielder, but in a league like the PL you need your midfielders to chip in with goals too. Just look at Diaby's record since he arrived;


Season Ap
2005-2006 11+5 =1 goal
2006-2007 13+5 =1 goal
2007-2008 20+8 =4 goals
2008-2009 25+11 =4 goals
2009-2010 35+5 =7 goals
2010-2011 17+3 =2 goals
2011-2012 0+5 =0 goals
2012-2013 6 =0 goals
Total 127+42 =19 goals

You deride Giroud even though he has been in a new country, at a new team with a different system, in a new league at a higher level for half a season - yet you laud Diaby who has contributed seriously fuck all apart from one or two very good performances per season, each time followed by months off injured... bizarre... :?

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48506
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by OneBardGooner »

N1Goon wrote:Going to put an early shout in for Giroud for this thread.

Howard Webb has more hair then Giroud.

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :?

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48506
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by OneBardGooner »

DB10GOONER wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:Le Chapman immortalised !

We can't be far away from a Lee Chapman vs Le Chapman poll?

I think 'Le' wins the best tattoos, whilst Lee's 80's flowing blond locks and the stylish green and blue kit levels it up.

On the field they're both as fucking hopeless as each other. Honestly, what with the Swansea PA system belting out some historic Swansea City song about silver swans or something, the German Willie Young showing his usual grace for their first goal, Giroud's Chapmanesque touch, and a visit to Swansea market, I was thinking of contacting the BBC for a new series of Life on Mars.

Opening line - "my name's SteveO. I had an accident and when I woke up it was 1982. I need to get back to 2013 to see if Arsene's contract gets extended"
You know SteveO, you have to live with the fact that Giroud has actually contributed more to The Arsenal cause in his HALF A SEASON with us than your beloved Diaby has in the last 3 years! :lol: At it's most basic he has scored as many goals in a HALF SEASON as Diaby has managed in the last 3 and a half seasons and made nearly as many appearances in HALF A SEASON as Diaby has in the last 2 and a half seasons!!

Sure, one's a striker and one is an attacking midfielder, but in a league like the PL you need your midfielders to chip in with goals too. Just look at Diaby's record since he arrived;


Season Ap
2005-2006 11+5 =1 goal
2006-2007 13+5 =1 goal
2007-2008 20+8 =4 goals
2008-2009 25+11 =4 goals
2009-2010 35+5 =7 goals
2010-2011 17+3 =2 goals
2011-2012 0+5 =0 goals
2012-2013 6 =0 goals
Total 127+42 =19 goals

You deride Giroud even though he has been in a new country, at a new team with a different system, in a new league at a higher level under a new manager who isn't his father for half a season - yet you laud Diaby who has contributed seriously fuck all apart from one or two very good performances per season, each time followed by months off injured... bizarre... :?
Sorry DB but you left out a very important and salient point... :wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62238
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by DB10GOONER »

OneBardGooner wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:Le Chapman immortalised !

We can't be far away from a Lee Chapman vs Le Chapman poll?

I think 'Le' wins the best tattoos, whilst Lee's 80's flowing blond locks and the stylish green and blue kit levels it up.

On the field they're both as fucking hopeless as each other. Honestly, what with the Swansea PA system belting out some historic Swansea City song about silver swans or something, the German Willie Young showing his usual grace for their first goal, Giroud's Chapmanesque touch, and a visit to Swansea market, I was thinking of contacting the BBC for a new series of Life on Mars.

Opening line - "my name's SteveO. I had an accident and when I woke up it was 1982. I need to get back to 2013 to see if Arsene's contract gets extended"
You know SteveO, you have to live with the fact that Giroud has actually contributed more to The Arsenal cause in his HALF A SEASON with us than your beloved Diaby has in the last 3 years! :lol: At it's most basic he has scored as many goals in a HALF SEASON as Diaby has managed in the last 3 and a half seasons and made nearly as many appearances in HALF A SEASON as Diaby has in the last 2 and a half seasons!!

Sure, one's a striker and one is an attacking midfielder, but in a league like the PL you need your midfielders to chip in with goals too. Just look at Diaby's record since he arrived;


Season Ap
2005-2006 11+5 =1 goal
2006-2007 13+5 =1 goal
2007-2008 20+8 =4 goals
2008-2009 25+11 =4 goals
2009-2010 35+5 =7 goals
2010-2011 17+3 =2 goals
2011-2012 0+5 =0 goals
2012-2013 6 =0 goals
Total 127+42 =19 goals

You deride Giroud even though he has been in a new country, at a new team with a different system, in a new league at a higher level under a new manager who isn't his father for half a season - yet you laud Diaby who has contributed seriously fuck all apart from one or two very good performances per season, each time followed by months off injured... bizarre... :?
Sorry DB but you left out a very important and salient point... :wink:
:lol:

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22160
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by SteveO 35 »

I shall look forward to bumping this in a year's time when everyone is ranting about Giroud being the latest big money waster we can't shift out. Gervinho was shit when we first signed him, so was Park, so was Vela, so were a whole host of other fucking signings. If you're good enough like Cazorla you can adapt straight away. Remember this isn't a 19 year old from Southampton we're talking about (although he seems to have adapted better than Le Chapman).....this is a 27 year old supposedly entering the peak years of his career.

I've offered up the reasons why I don't rate him. Rather than make ridiculous comparisons to an infinitely more talented but injury prone midfielder (who by the way has rarely been used as an attacking midfielder), why not offer up some reasons as to why you rate Giroud?

Personally I think he's paceless, not even very good in the air for his size, poor touch, always off balance, doesn't work hard for the team. What's the case for his defence? Is it just that Henry started off quite slowly and became a world beater so this bloke might too?

goonerus28
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by goonerus28 »

SteveO 35 wrote:I shall look forward to bumping this in a year's time when everyone is ranting about Giroud being the latest big money waster we can't shift out. Gervinho was shit when we first signed him, so was Park, so was Vela, so were a whole host of other fucking signings. If you're good enough like Cazorla you can adapt straight away. Remember this isn't a 19 year old from Southampton we're talking about (although he seems to have adapted better than Le Chapman).....this is a 27 year old supposedly entering the peak years of his career.

I've offered up the reasons why I don't rate him. Rather than make ridiculous comparisons to an infinitely more talented but injury prone midfielder (who by the way has rarely been used as an attacking midfielder), why not offer up some reasons as to why you rate Giroud?

Personally I think he's paceless, not even very good in the air for his size, poor touch, always off balance, doesn't work hard for the team. What's the case for his defence? Is it just that Henry started off quite slowly and became a world beater so this bloke might too?
Your problem is that you expecting too much from french guy. Giroud is not van Persie and never will be near that level.
I think he's doing quite well considering there is no coaching at Arsenal at all. The team doesn't know how to defend, attack, how to play pressing football. Just bunch of individuals. Giroud nas no fcking clue how to play this tippy-tappy shit and nobody knows.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62238
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by DB10GOONER »

SteveO 35 wrote:I shall look forward to bumping this in a year's time when everyone is ranting about Giroud being the latest big money waster we can't shift out. Gervinho was shit when we first signed him, so was Park, so was Vela, so were a whole host of other fucking signings. If you're good enough like Cazorla you can adapt straight away. Remember this isn't a 19 year old from Southampton we're talking about (although he seems to have adapted better than Le Chapman).....this is a 27 year old supposedly entering the peak years of his career.

I've offered up the reasons why I don't rate him. Rather than make ridiculous comparisons to an infinitely more talented but injury prone midfielder (who by the way has rarely been used as an attacking midfielder), why not offer up some reasons as to why you rate Giroud?

Personally I think he's paceless, not even very good in the air for his size, poor touch, always off balance, doesn't work hard for the team. What's the case for his defence? Is it just that Henry started off quite slowly and became a world beater so this bloke might too?
Jaysus, SteveO do you ever actually fucking READ this forum? You seem to just take any meaning you want out of what people write! We've done the why Giroud is not complete dogshit thread a hundred times!! :roll: :lol: :wink:

I wouldn't go so far as to say I "rate" Giroud as such. But I wouldn't write him off so early based on so few games. Of course it is very possible that he won't cut it in the PL. No one is denying that. Very very possible. The point some of us are making is that it makes no sense to write the guy off after half a season ESPECIALLY given the mitigating circumstances of;

- playing in a league of higher quality
- adapting to a new country
- trying to learn and fit into a system he is unfamiliar with
- trying to adapt to the pace and physicality of the PL
- working under a manager with no tactical clue and no idea how to get the best from his players anymore
- playing in a team that cannot provide the crosses for one of his obvious strengths (getting up and winning headers)

I totally disagree with your opinion that he doesn't work for the team. He does. Hard. Never shirks a challenge in the air and wins most - especially in the oppo half (problem then is we have 9 midfielders all behind him so the ball he wins inevitably doesn't get picked up). This is down to Wenger - why the fuck take an obvious target man, a bloke that can win headers, and then play him up front mostly on his own? :roll: Why not play him as part of a 4-4-2 to avail of his knockdowns as we did with Smudge and Wrighty for example?

Also disagree with the Cazorla comparison. Cazorla is an attacking midfielder and so his ability is far easier to spot by the very definition of his role - he either can split a defence with a brilliant pass or he can't, his role is to develop the play, pick the passes, it's very much in his own hands. Whereas with a striker like Giroud he is really the end of the process, relying on the supply being decent enough for him to do his best work, in his case (I think) in the air, but we have no decent crossers so there's one of his main talents not being utilised enough through no fault of his own. Would also say if we are comparing their "contribution" rather than outright skill (my original point about Diaby v Giroud BTW) I would say that whereas Cazorla is obviously a classy player he can be lazy and often goes missing for huge parts of games, wheras Giroud always runs and harries, gets up for every high ball and always looks to get involved. Of the two I'd say Giroud puts more effort in, but obviously doesn't have the technical ability Cazorla has.

As I say Giroud might not make it in the PL, and I agree his first touch is not great and he isn't a pacey player, but to write him off so early is mental. It's almost like you are hoping he fails just because Wenger signed him... another stick to beat Wenger with (as if we need anymore!)... please tell me it's not that Steve... :?

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Re: Arsene's Worst Signings

Post by QuartzGooner »

[Just seen DB10's post but had written this before I saw it]

For me Giroud is a player that should have been signed whilst Van Persie was still here, and given a season to adapt.

He had just had a step-up season in French football, and was sort of a French version "Jenkinson"; a raw potential player who was playing lower league football only recently and cannot be expected to do great things immediately.

Instead he has been thrown into the deep end and is trying to swim not sink.
With Chamakh on loan, and a hit and miss Gervinho offering little competition, it is really only Theo who can offer competition up front, and he is a player learning the striker position himself!
There is of course Podolski, but for everyone who says he should be striker, who else would regularly play wide left midfield?

The Ox?
Again, still learning the ropes.
I reckon Santos (yes really) or Gibbs would be worth a go in left midfield IF we had a solid left back, but we only have a youngster Meade to fill in.

Wenger's fault, not Giroud's.

Post Reply