
Watch this space

Chippy wrote:Any chance we can let this tedious bloody thread die?
Augie will need at least another 5 pages to tell us all "I was right" next time he has a shit gameChippy wrote:Any chance we can let this tedious bloody thread die?
northbank123 wrote:It's Friday so I'm going out to get cunted to celebrate Feo's new deal![]()
mcdowell42 wrote:At least its done now cos i reckon it was boring the shit out of everybody,now we can go out and buy super quality seeing as wenger was unable to multi-task and do both at the same time
Watch this space
And differnce is they are good.northbank123 wrote:There are players on far more ridiculous deals at most other PL clubs. Difference is that they don't conduct their contract negotiations in the public domain.SteveO 35 wrote:Well Feo my old son, the club have done their bit so now its over to you.
Look, its a lot of money but there are players out there getting bumper deals left, right and centre. Some of them work out and some of them don't.
Only time will tell
Yeah like Adebayor - he was cracking value for the 160k per week, or Balotelli with his 1 Premier League goal on the same wage. How about Joe Cole on 100k per week, and Wayne Bridge before his deal finally run out on 85k per week.ThomasMitchell wrote:And differnce is they are good.northbank123 wrote:There are players on far more ridiculous deals at most other PL clubs. Difference is that they don't conduct their contract negotiations in the public domain.SteveO 35 wrote:Well Feo my old son, the club have done their bit so now its over to you.
Look, its a lot of money but there are players out there getting bumper deals left, right and centre. Some of them work out and some of them don't.
Only time will tell
Just because other Club's overpay some of their players does not mean we should follow suit - after all look where it has got us, unable to sell the dross we have becuase we overpay them. I am all for paying top player top money. Walcott is quite simply not a top player. The Club deserves no credit for this deal - signing an average player for over the odds and giving him what he wanted all along when they could have ended the speculation months ago. Another example of the shambles that is the modern day Arsenal.SteveO 35 wrote:Yeah like Adebayor - he was cracking value for the 160k per week, or Balotelli with his 1 Premier League goal on the same wage. How about Joe Cole on 100k per week, and Wayne Bridge before his deal finally run out on 85k per week.ThomasMitchell wrote:And differnce is they are good.northbank123 wrote:There are players on far more ridiculous deals at most other PL clubs. Difference is that they don't conduct their contract negotiations in the public domain.SteveO 35 wrote:Well Feo my old son, the club have done their bit so now its over to you.
Look, its a lot of money but there are players out there getting bumper deals left, right and centre. Some of them work out and some of them don't.
Only time will tell
The club deserve a bit of credit for this one for once
I was replying to your comment "the difference is they are good".....and quite clearly my friend there's a stack of fucking dross earning at least as much as him.....so they are not all good are they?ThomasMitchell wrote:Just because other Club's overpay some of their players does not mean we should follow suit - after all look where it has got us, unable to sell the dross we have becuase we overpay them. I am all for paying top player top money. Walcott is quite simply not a top player. The Club deserves no credit for this deal - signing an average player for over the odds and giving him what he wanted all along when they could have ended the speculation months ago. Another example of the shambles that is the modern day Arsenal.SteveO 35 wrote:Yeah like Adebayor - he was cracking value for the 160k per week, or Balotelli with his 1 Premier League goal on the same wage. How about Joe Cole on 100k per week, and Wayne Bridge before his deal finally run out on 85k per week.ThomasMitchell wrote:And differnce is they are good.northbank123 wrote:There are players on far more ridiculous deals at most other PL clubs. Difference is that they don't conduct their contract negotiations in the public domain.SteveO 35 wrote:Well Feo my old son, the club have done their bit so now its over to you.
Look, its a lot of money but there are players out there getting bumper deals left, right and centre. Some of them work out and some of them don't.
Only time will tell
The club deserve a bit of credit for this one for once
ThomasMitchell wrote:So another average player is rewarded for achieving nothing, winning nothing and putting in a performance one in every ten games. It will be a pleasure to watch him in every game knowing he is on £100,000 a week for doing precisely nothing. When will it all end?
Just because other Club's overpay some of their players does not mean we should follow suit - after all look where it has got us, unable to sell the dross we have becuase we overpay them. I am all for paying top player top money. Walcott is quite simply not a top player. The Club deserves no credit for this deal - signing an average player for over the odds and giving him what he wanted all along when they could have ended the speculation months ago. Another example of the shambles that is the modern day Arsenal.[/quote]SteveO 35 wrote:Yeah like Adebayor - he was cracking value for the 160k per week, or Balotelli with his 1 Premier League goal on the same wage. How about Joe Cole on 100k per week, and Wayne Bridge before his deal finally run out on 85k per week.ThomasMitchell wrote:And differnce is they are good.SteveO 35 wrote:There are players on far more ridiculous deals at most other PL clubs. Difference is that they don't conduct their contract negotiations in the public domain.ThomasMitchell wrote:Only time will tell
The club deserve a bit of credit for this one for once