THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
skizz_b
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:26 pm
Location: LDN

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by skizz_b »

I Hate Hleb wrote:
skizz_b wrote:FFS LEAVE OFF I HAVE NO FRIENDS OTHER THAN ON THIS FORUM AND IF YOUR ARGUMENT GETS IT SHUT DOWN AGAIN I SWEAR I WILL CHOP YOUR BOLLOCKS OFF THE PAIR OF YOU! NOW KISS AND MAKE UP! :cheekkiss:
:lol: :lol:

Ever considered getting a job at the United Nations? :rubchin: :barscarf: :lol: :lol: :wink:
i will now! :barscarf: :lol:

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by clockender1 »

if anyone who is still defending Wenger to stay on can explain to me how the club has moved on in the last 3, 2 or 1 years, then I am all ears.

every year our results just get worse - this year - bradford, norwich, schalke and swansea. and one win against the top six....

and please bear in mind when replying that we have the 2nd highest paid manager, the 4th highest wage bill - which is decided by the manager, so its not city's spending or the board being misers...

User avatar
cameron326
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:06 am

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by cameron326 »

We have finished 3rd or 4th under Wenger every one of the past six seasons, coinciding with the move to the Emirates. Moreover, in the same period we've achieved at least a place in the last 16 of the Champions League every season - among those also a quarter and two semifinals.

The official UEFA coefficient, which takes account of performances in Europe over the past five seasons, has us in 6th place. For comparison, Liverpool are 18th, Milan are 13th and Inter are 9th. Only the super giants of world football ie: Barca, Man Utd, Bayern, Madrid . . . and Chelsea are above us. Of course we all want trophies and us fans would be delighted at the FA Cup or Carling Cup - but sadly these are viewed as lesser prizes in this day and age as winning them has a neglible impact on the size of a clubs fan base, marketability and finances etc compared to doing well in the Premier League and Europe. As fans of course we dont like this, but thats how it is.

While Wenger's teams have failed to really shine like they did in the first half of his rein, it would be a real push to look at the cold hard facts outlined above, to look at them in relation to the size of club, fanbase, wage bill (4th in the country), the financing of a new stadium, and the spending power of domestic rivals over this period, and to say that the club has been underperfoming.

. . . treading water, perhaps, but is being the sixth best team in EUROPE over the past half decade grounds for a sacking? Maybe it would be for those teams placed 1st, 2nd 3rd and 4th in that UEFA table, but not at Arsenal and especially not in context of a move to a new stadium. It would have to get a lot worse than one or two dodgy signings each season, and the occasional on-pitch collapse, to be able to objectively say that Wenger was severely underperforming as manager.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by northbank123 »

Let's talk about our CL success then. Our ONE semi-final in that time, what happened? Oh yes, we were violated for 180 minutes by United (who were then hammered in the final). Just like we were fucking caned up there the previous season in the FA Cup, just like we were twatted by Spurs in the Carling Cup that year. Add our complete league collapse from February onwards, and it's difficult to believe that that's the strongest team we've had since moving and the only half-challenge we've mounted at the title.

If you think that qualification is a success then fine, great for you. But we're never ever going to win the fucking thing at the moment, so really what is the huge success in qualifying for it ahead of teams who we pay 50-120% more than in wages? Especially seeing as it's been at the complete sacrifice of the FA Cup every season since then.

Blowing the one time we've got close to a trophy against a relegated side in the League Cup final in that time should warrant underperforming in anybody's book for a club of our stature with a wage bill of our size if you're going to depend that heavily on financial statistics, especially given the clubs that have actually won or seriously challenged for trophies at that time.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62056
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by DB10GOONER »

cameron326 wrote:We have finished 3rd or 4th under Wenger every one of the past six seasons, coinciding with the move to the Emirates. Moreover, in the same period we've achieved at least a place in the last 16 of the Champions League every season - among those also a quarter and two semifinals.

The official UEFA coefficient, which takes account of performances in Europe over the past five seasons, has us in 6th place. For comparison, Liverpool are 18th, Milan are 13th and Inter are 9th. Only the super giants of world football ie: Barca, Man Utd, Bayern, Madrid . . . and Chelsea are above us. Of course we all want trophies and us fans would be delighted at the FA Cup or Carling Cup - but sadly these are viewed as lesser prizes in this day and age as winning them has a neglible impact on the size of a clubs fan base, marketability and finances etc compared to doing well in the Premier League and Europe. As fans of course we dont like this, but thats how it is.

While Wenger's teams have failed to really shine like they did in the first half of his rein, it would be a real push to look at the cold hard facts outlined above, to look at them in relation to the size of club, fanbase, wage bill (4th in the country), the financing of a new stadium, and the spending power of domestic rivals over this period, and to say that the club has been underperfoming.

. . . treading water, perhaps, but is being the sixth best team in EUROPE over the past half decade grounds for a sacking? Maybe it would be for those teams placed 1st, 2nd 3rd and 4th in that UEFA table, but not at Arsenal and especially not in context of a move to a new stadium. It would have to get a lot worse than one or two dodgy signings each season, and the occasional on-pitch collapse, to be able to objectively say that Wenger was severely underperforming as manager.

Cameron, I’m not having a pop at you personally here, mate. But that post is the most dispiriting, depressing thing I’ve read in a long long time. If your post is representative of the Wenger supports’ justification of why Wenger is a “success” and why he should stay then I despair, I really do.

Why should we accept qualifying for the CL as success? Who said that is success? Wenger? The Wenger-love in that is the media led by the uber-smug Patrick Barclay?

Is this a generational thing? When did winning become a dirty word? When did accepting mediocrity become the norm? I’m 45. I was raised at a time when you played sport to win. Not to participate and be nice and give everyone a little medal and a pat on the back. You played to win. End of.

As for the mindless stat-fest that is The official UEFA coefficient? Let’s look at actual trophy winning success, shall we? The real cold facts are we have not won a trophy since 2005. We are a money rich club that squanders huge wages on average and poor players and then extends the contracts of those same failed players – all at the behest of our manager, Arsene Wenger. That is fact in anyone’s book.

Since we last won that trophy? The following teams have all won trophies; Liverpool, Chavs, Portsmouth, Man Citeh, Manure, Scum and Birmingham. I wonder where the Scum, Portsmouth and Birmingham figure on that official UEFA coefficient.

User avatar
Herd
Posts: 6386
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:00 am

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by Herd »

I have to say we are becoming like Spurs used to be when it comes to going after players .
They used to regularly hoodwink their fans into thinking they were going to sign top drawer players by getting their buddies in fleet street to print lies ,on one occasion they even flew to Madrid only to find that their target had never heard of them and that Real Madrid confirmed that nobody had even rung them from Spurs .

I just want tomorrow to come and go quickly firstly cos it annoys the fuck out of me and secondly because I havent had any alcohol ciggies or curries for almost a whole month and it's time for a session .

Watching Arsenal in January sober has sucked !

User avatar
cameron326
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:06 am

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by cameron326 »

DB10Gooner
If your post is representative of the Wenger supports’ justification of why Wenger is a “success” and why he should stay then I despair, I really do.
My point is that, in the eyes of the board, or perhaps I should say, the pockets of the board - he is a success. While in the eyes of the fans the last half decade+ has been a failure, Wenger has regardless met the targets set by his employer(s). Can you expect an employee who is ticking the boxes set by their superiors to be sacked? Not particularly realistic or fair either for that matter.

I guess my point in short is - I blame the board. I'm not happy about it either, but when Wenger says Top 4 is what matters, not, eg, the Cups that's not HIS ideas we're hearing, its the boards. How do I know? Well, because otherwise he'd have been out of a job three or four seasons ago . . .

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62056
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by DB10GOONER »

cameron326 wrote:DB10Gooner
If your post is representative of the Wenger supports’ justification of why Wenger is a “success” and why he should stay then I despair, I really do.
My point is that, in the eyes of the board, or perhaps I should say, the pockets of the board - he is a success. While in the eyes of the fans the last half decade+ has been a failure, Wenger has regardless met the targets set by his employer(s). Can you expect an employee who is ticking the boxes set by their superiors to be sacked? Not particularly realistic or fair either for that matter.

I guess my point in short is - I blame the board. I'm not happy about it either, but when Wenger says Top 4 is what matters, not, eg, the Cups that's not HIS ideas we're hearing, its the boards. How do I know? Well, because otherwise he'd have been out of a job three or four seasons ago . . .
I agree the Board must carry their share of guilt for the sorry state of affairs we find ourselves in. But I don’t think that absolves Wenger of the lion’s share of guilt. He picks the players we buy, he agrees the terms, he decides who gets an undeserved improved contract extension and pay rise. He has literally squandered millions over the last 8 years on poor quality players. He persists with his flawed version of Barca-Lite tippy tappy even though we don't have the technical players capable of playing that system.

If he was as much a man of honour as he likes us to believe he would have resigned if the fault lay solely with the Board. But no, he keeps picking up his £7m a year. He is, for all intents and purposes, a co-conspirator.

For me the Board’s single biggest failing (of many failings) is not sacking Wenger. Of course they won’t because he fulfils their minimal target aspirations.

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by northbank123 »

cameron326 wrote:DB10Gooner
If your post is representative of the Wenger supports’ justification of why Wenger is a “success” and why he should stay then I despair, I really do.
My point is that, in the eyes of the board, or perhaps I should say, the pockets of the board - he is a success. While in the eyes of the fans the last half decade+ has been a failure, Wenger has regardless met the targets set by his employer(s). Can you expect an employee who is ticking the boxes set by their superiors to be sacked? Not particularly realistic or fair either for that matter.

I guess my point in short is - I blame the board. I'm not happy about it either, but when Wenger says Top 4 is what matters, not, eg, the Cups that's not HIS ideas we're hearing, its the boards. How do I know? Well, because otherwise he'd have been out of a job three or four seasons ago . . .
That wasn't how you said it though in your original post. You wrote a few paragraphs without using the words "board" or "directors" and it was written completely from the perspective that you feel he is performing adequately. At least have the conviction to stick to your guns and have a proper debate.

Everybody in the world knows the board are happy with him, otherwise he wouldn't be in a job. I basically agree with what DB10 said about Wenger being the one calling almost every shot (young players, players' contracts, signings, 4-5-fucking-1, style of football) and also that the board's biggest failing is by a long way their failure to sack Wenger.

And why do people get it into their heads that you either have to prioritise top 4 or the FA Cup? It's ludicrous, bearing in mind we normally crash out about 5th round are 3 extra games in the course of a 60-game season really worth sacrificing what is by then our only chance of a trophy? The number of players on the books of Arsenal is fucking outrageous, unfortunately the only players who should be providing competition or opportunity for rotation are perennially injured, rotting in the reserves or loaned out because they aren't good enough.

User avatar
Den10kamp
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:20 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by Den10kamp »

Yes his time is up,

I honestly beleive his salary is linked to a bonus based on how much he DOESNT spend !!!! the pattern is startling

HIS JOB IS FIRST TEAM MANAGER NOT BANK MANAGER get the results and stop worrying about how much interest is being made ..... FOCUS ON YOUR JOB

he doesnt want the best players to play for arsenal anymore

even our 13/15 million pound signings are players of a ceratin claibre but still on the cheap

I was an arsenal fan well before he was a manager !!!

managers come and go, fans are loyal for their whole lives

ARSENAL FC !!! NOT ARSENE FC

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by clockender1 »

cameron326 wrote: It would have to get a lot worse than one or two dodgy signings each season, and the occasional on-pitch collapse, to be able to objectively say that Wenger was severely underperforming as manager.
occasional ? - bradford, norwich, swansea and schalke.

this year, so far....

Topside Northbank
Posts: 636
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:06 am

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by Topside Northbank »

He has a 140m+ wage bill to work with he trusts barely 14 players in the squad to use when all fit so the statement about a strong squad he uses is ridiculous.

He then claims to use a socialist wage bill policy....flawed straight away it rewards underperformers in the squad & you have no chance of shifting the bad contracts we have to use OGL use of political spin i will be conservative in saying we have at least 10 players we can't shift because of it.

I could go on on about the waste on the financial side we have the fourth highest wage bill so we are par for the course as far as CL qualification goes.

On the pitch regardless of the talent we have cashed in year on year the same problems raise there head lack of defensive organisation being the biggest problem zonal marking gets most headlines.The hunger to close down opponents being what stands out to me you can have the best defenders in the world without organisation added to desire you will struggle big time.

The manager the board are equally to blame no one willing to push the club forward on the field but hoodwink the gullable with well released PR freezing ticket prices after a january of inertia.The SKY cameras being in place for Wigan game showing the club giving out Gazidis vouchers to appease the magnificent away support let alone the refunds after the disgrace at OT.

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 47919
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by OneBardGooner »

All good things (eventually) come to an end..And Wenger is looooong past his Sell By Date. He reminds me of one of those artists/musicians who made great music and records (usually 4 or 5 at most) and then they dine out on their past (old, tired and boring ) rep....It takes a rare , rare genius to be able to adapt to new trends, progressions etc whilst keeping pace with contemporaries and new incomers in their chosen field, and even then they make the odd howler...David Bowie is a Prime Example in music....Fergie is a rarity - regardless of how much he has spent etc and what people (especially non-manure fans) think of him for ...He has more or less consistently delivered in one form or another....it has been 8 Years since we won a trophy (FA Cup) and I think I would be correct in saying we were very fortunate not to get panned that day...We had a reputation for being a BIG Club..a Family Orientated Club, A Club with "Honour" and "Class", that is no longer how I see us...and feck it hurts, it saddens and angers me....and it is due to the board AND Wenger, they have contrived between them to bring out club to such a low ebb, that fans have now become totally polarised. It used to be "WE are THE Arsenal and it is US against the world".

The thing is I can only see one direction under Inspector Clueless and those *word censored* on the board...DOWNWARD in every sense of the term.

Wenger thanks for the good times...but those who loved you most are beginning to hate you, because you will not admit that you are long past your prime. TIME TO GO.


:cry: :cry: :cry:

User avatar
spendsum4uckingmoney
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 2:30 pm

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by spendsum4uckingmoney »

There's only 1 Aaron Ramsey!!










..............and he had to play for us :(

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 47919
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Arsene Wenger - For him or against him?

Post by OneBardGooner »

After tonight's Total Debacle against a scouse team that we should rip up....I'm wondering what phrases and excuses Inspector Clueless will stain the airwaves with?

A little nervous

Not focused

Leggy

Handbrake on

Lacked a leetul dis a leetle dat...


He'll blame anyhting and anyone but HIMSELF!

WHAT a DISHONOURABLE PERSON...HE SHOULD RESIGN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Post Reply