I'm really talking serious, long-term injuries.DB10GOONER wrote:VoiceOfReason wrote:But in 2009, when RVP was last injured, we hadn't sold all our best players. Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas and the rest of them all jumped ship (regardless of whether or not they were injured). Arsenal in 2012, with all these departures, were displaying lower-than-normal ambition. And that's why RVP wanted to go at that time, IMO. It's not as if we'd just signed Alonso, Villa and Mata (for example). We were signing players below the standard of what we had before, and maybe if that had been the club's policy in 2009 (to such a great extent), he might have been wondering about his future then too.DB10GOONER wrote:But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us.I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.![]()
So the ankle injury in August 2010 didn’t happen? Or the knee injury in Feb 2011? Or the reoccurrence of it in March 2011? And he didn’t spend almost half the 2010-2011 season injured? We all imagined that? Thank God! You do the pro-RVJC camp no favours, mate!![]()
Arsenal v Manure
- VoiceOfReason
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:48 pm
Re: Arsenal v Manure
Re: Arsenal v Manure
Your just pissed off that you still owe me 20 beer vouchers for all the goals he banged in the other year.DB10GOONER wrote:augie wrote:DB10GOONER wrote:But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us.I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
You just wont let this go will you ? Just admit that you are wrong and we can all let this lie![]()
![]()
He's a judas cúnt. There. We're done.![]()
- highburyJD
- Posts: 4982
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
- Location: Highbury
Re: Arsenal v Manure
was gonna stick my snout in but DB10 has this totally covered
not only on vanPursestrings (sellout user *word censored*)
but also on the pro-DutchSkunkers, who would give character references to crackheads,
as long as it was Wenger's house they burgled
hope next time Mrs vanStaplecunt catches him, she cuts it off
not only on vanPursestrings (sellout user *word censored*)
but also on the pro-DutchSkunkers, who would give character references to crackheads,
as long as it was Wenger's house they burgled
hope next time Mrs vanStaplecunt catches him, she cuts it off
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Arsenal v Manure
highburyJD wrote:was gonna stick my snout in but DB10 has this totally covered
not only on vanPursestrings (sellout user *word censored*)
but also on the pro-DutchSkunkers, who would give character references to crackheads,
as long as it was Wenger's house they burgled
hope next time Mrs vanStaplecunt catches him, she cuts it off


- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62056
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Arsenal v Manure
Number 5 wrote:Your just pissed off that you still owe me 20 beer vouchers for all the goals he banged in the other year.DB10GOONER wrote:augie wrote:DB10GOONER wrote:But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us.I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
You just wont let this go will you ? Just admit that you are wrong and we can all let this lie![]()
![]()
He's a judas cúnt. There. We're done.![]()

I do indeed. But I'll just be handing you back the 20 you handed me the year before!

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62056
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Arsenal v Manure
You wouldn't call missing half the 2010-2011 season a serious or long term injury?VoiceOfReason wrote:I'm really talking serious, long-term injuries.DB10GOONER wrote:VoiceOfReason wrote:But in 2009, when RVP was last injured, we hadn't sold all our best players. Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas and the rest of them all jumped ship (regardless of whether or not they were injured). Arsenal in 2012, with all these departures, were displaying lower-than-normal ambition. And that's why RVP wanted to go at that time, IMO. It's not as if we'd just signed Alonso, Villa and Mata (for example). We were signing players below the standard of what we had before, and maybe if that had been the club's policy in 2009 (to such a great extent), he might have been wondering about his future then too.DB10GOONER wrote:But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us.I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.![]()
So the ankle injury in August 2010 didn’t happen? Or the knee injury in Feb 2011? Or the reoccurrence of it in March 2011? And he didn’t spend almost half the 2010-2011 season injured? We all imagined that? Thank God! You do the pro-RVJC camp no favours, mate!![]()

- I Hate Hleb
- Posts: 18632
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
- Location: London
Re: Arsenal v Manure
Depends. Compared to the spells Rosicky and Diaby had out, you could almost call it a sabbatical!!





- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62056
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Arsenal v Manure
I Hate Hleb wrote:Depends. Compared to the spells Rosicky and Diaby had out, you could almost call it a sabbatical!!![]()
![]()
![]()

I think we'll be waiting a bit longer for Diaby to have his one brilliant season and force a move to Man United though!


- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 47919
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Arsenal v Manure
Diaby is NOT injured. he is simply on Secondment to the Medical Team, so he has the skills to follow another career path once his playing days are over...errmmm
...in that case is he now a member of the medical team?. 



