clockender1 wrote:
real won without him in the side mostly.
i think the English travel more than most - i've lived in three countries and most of my mates now live abroad, Germany, Holland, Sheffield, Thailand etc.
my point was a lot of british players fail abroad - i think Brady, Gary Charles, Jimmy Greaves, keegan, Lineker and Beckham are the exceptions aren't they ?
i've always thought it was the difference in footballing culture more than the language, heat, food etc - in England you can go out with your mates and drink, smoke and fight no bother. in Europe they expect you to do none of those things.
McManaman was never a regular, but I wouldn't say he failed. He wasn't that special in England, so I wasn't expecting him to light up the Bernabeu either. But, I thought he did ok and fitted into their style very well. And, of course, won 2 Champions League finals; scoring in one of them.
I think Platt also did well in Italy, didn't he? (just before my time really)
But yes, there's not a great deal of Brits that have played abroad; successfully or otherwise. Mainly because the strength of the English league has kept many of our stars at home. But also our style of play has't attracted the big foreign clubs, I suppose.
Rooney, Lampard, Gerrard, Shearer, Cashley, Carrick, Scholes, Ferdinand, etc. would have been a success abroad though, I reckon. If you can play for top English clubs, winning CL trophies along the way, then why not? - as long as the make up of the team they join suits them, I see no reason to suggest they wouldn't cope.
I just don't agree with this idea that British players don't travel well. I think the sample size is too small, and our best possible exports choose to stay at home. Other countries have 100s of players playing abroad - most don't succeed, but we remember the success stories thus skewing the truth.