THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by kiwomya »

northbank123 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.

Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
The old money argument. No amount of money spent by other teams is a viable excuse for us getting shitter. It's not just that other teams have surpassed us, we have gone backwards.
I can't sit here and say i'm overjoyed with all aspects of the club but we've not gone backwards nor are we "shitter". I honestly can't see how you can come to that conclusion. We've already got more league points than we finished with at the close of 2012, that's also whilst competing in a tough CL group where we also finished with more points than last season.

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by I Hate Hleb »

kiwomya wrote:
BFG4 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.

Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
This is an excuse, and nothing else. The other teams may have more money, but that does not explain, why we do little or no business in the transfer market. Even this summer when we signed a world class player, we neglected making other signings we needed, mainly a world class striker. Arsenal are a club interested in top four finishes, and nothing else. Oh, and your money argument falls down, when you see Wigan, Birmingham, Portsmouth, and Swansea, who have all been more successful than Arsenal in the past eight years.
I'm just offering it as how I see it.

I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
On the contrary, I've heard most fans of those clubs when questioned by the media, say they wouldn't swap the day and seeing their team win a trophy, for staying up. I appreciate it's different for them as they're not used to success but the general point is still valid.

Leyton Gooner
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:34 am
Location: Lokomotiv Plovdiv in the Channel 5 Thursday night cup

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Leyton Gooner »

If we won a trophy while being "relegated" from the Be All And End All bloated bore fest that is the champions league (i.e not winning the VT) I'd be over the fucking moon

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by northbank123 »

kiwomya wrote:
northbank123 wrote:
kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.

Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
The old money argument. No amount of money spent by other teams is a viable excuse for us getting shitter. It's not just that other teams have surpassed us, we have gone backwards.
I can't sit here and say i'm overjoyed with all aspects of the club but we've not gone backwards nor are we "shitter". I honestly can't see how you can come to that conclusion. We've already got more league points than we finished with at the close of 2012, that's also whilst competing in a tough CL group where we also finished with more points than last season.
We're not shitter than we were in 2012, I didn't mean to suggest we were. I was more referring to the previous 8 seasons where we were going backwards every year.

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by armchair »

kiwomya wrote:
I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
Im sure I must be reading this wrong or maybe reading too much into it. But to me this post seems to suggest that if we actually try to win a domestic cup, (And not sacrifice it by dropping key players to chase the 4th place trophy or CL) may be in danger of relegation?

I am wrong arent I? :?

Steve_I
Posts: 547
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:50 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Steve_I »

armchair supporter wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
Im sure I must be reading this wrong or maybe reading too much into it. But to me this post seems to suggest that if we actually try to win a domestic cup, (And not sacrifice it by dropping key players to chase the 4th place trophy or CL) may be in danger of relegation?

I am wrong arent I? :?
I believe you are....







...in many ways. ;)

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62158
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

falkirk goon wrote:Furburger 8)
Fantastic return shot. Deuce! :lol:

falkirk goon
Posts: 4856
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by falkirk goon »

DB10GOONER wrote:
falkirk goon wrote:Furburger 8)
Fantastic return shot. Deuce! :lol:
:D

User avatar
Swifty
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:43 am
Location: Redhead

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Swifty »

AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62158
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Superb. 8)

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SPUDMASHER »

:lol: Ditto :lol: :lol:

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !

mcdowell42
Posts: 18305
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by mcdowell42 »

SteveO 35 wrote:
Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !

Oh sign him up quick

User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

mcdowell42 wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !

Oh sign him up quick
Not saying that for a minute......

defleppardisking
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:30 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by defleppardisking »

AVB AVB.................. THERE'S ONLY ONE AVB
:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Post Reply