I can't sit here and say i'm overjoyed with all aspects of the club but we've not gone backwards nor are we "shitter". I honestly can't see how you can come to that conclusion. We've already got more league points than we finished with at the close of 2012, that's also whilst competing in a tough CL group where we also finished with more points than last season.northbank123 wrote:The old money argument. No amount of money spent by other teams is a viable excuse for us getting shitter. It's not just that other teams have surpassed us, we have gone backwards.kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.
Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
THE WENGER THREAD
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
- I Hate Hleb
- Posts: 18632
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
- Location: London
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
On the contrary, I've heard most fans of those clubs when questioned by the media, say they wouldn't swap the day and seeing their team win a trophy, for staying up. I appreciate it's different for them as they're not used to success but the general point is still valid.kiwomya wrote:I'm just offering it as how I see it.BFG4 wrote:This is an excuse, and nothing else. The other teams may have more money, but that does not explain, why we do little or no business in the transfer market. Even this summer when we signed a world class player, we neglected making other signings we needed, mainly a world class striker. Arsenal are a club interested in top four finishes, and nothing else. Oh, and your money argument falls down, when you see Wigan, Birmingham, Portsmouth, and Swansea, who have all been more successful than Arsenal in the past eight years.kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.
Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
-
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:34 am
- Location: Lokomotiv Plovdiv in the Channel 5 Thursday night cup
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
If we won a trophy while being "relegated" from the Be All And End All bloated bore fest that is the champions league (i.e not winning the VT) I'd be over the fucking moon
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
We're not shitter than we were in 2012, I didn't mean to suggest we were. I was more referring to the previous 8 seasons where we were going backwards every year.kiwomya wrote:I can't sit here and say i'm overjoyed with all aspects of the club but we've not gone backwards nor are we "shitter". I honestly can't see how you can come to that conclusion. We've already got more league points than we finished with at the close of 2012, that's also whilst competing in a tough CL group where we also finished with more points than last season.northbank123 wrote:The old money argument. No amount of money spent by other teams is a viable excuse for us getting shitter. It's not just that other teams have surpassed us, we have gone backwards.kiwomya wrote:If we won the league City and Chelsea would go and spend another 100M each in the summer to make sure it didn't happen again next season. Although Chelsea seemed to have slowed down, they still spent 60M+ in the summer in acquiring players they didn't really need. Whilst they have monopoly money and are able to buy an infinite amount of players, we're going to remain bystanders along with Liverpool, Spurs and the other "nearly" teams. For me, the Champions League is pretty much the same. Get drawn against Real, Barca, PSG (probably Monaco in the next few years) and you'll be up against the overseas versions of City/Chelsea.
Football fans shouldn't need to be interested in the money side of things but in 2013, unfortunately, you do.
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Im sure I must be reading this wrong or maybe reading too much into it. But to me this post seems to suggest that if we actually try to win a domestic cup, (And not sacrifice it by dropping key players to chase the 4th place trophy or CL) may be in danger of relegation?kiwomya wrote:
I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
I am wrong arent I?

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
I believe you are....armchair supporter wrote:Im sure I must be reading this wrong or maybe reading too much into it. But to me this post seems to suggest that if we actually try to win a domestic cup, (And not sacrifice it by dropping key players to chase the 4th place trophy or CL) may be in danger of relegation?kiwomya wrote:
I'm not sure winning a single cup makes up for relegation though. I think if you were to ask any fan of those four clubs who was more successful I think they might just disagree with you.
I am wrong arent I?
...in many ways.

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62158
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Fantastic return shot. Deuce!falkirk goon wrote:Furburger

-
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
- Location: In a darkened room
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
DB10GOONER wrote:Fantastic return shot. Deuce!falkirk goon wrote:Furburger

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62158
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......



Superb.

- SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
-
- Posts: 18305
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
SteveO 35 wrote:And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
Oh sign him up quick
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Not saying that for a minute......mcdowell42 wrote:SteveO 35 wrote:And still won more trophies in one season (10/11) than Wenger has in the last decade !Swifty wrote:AVB is available! DOES spend money - DOESN'T win stuff. 50% improvement.......
Oh sign him up quick
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 6:30 pm
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
AVB AVB.................. THERE'S ONLY ONE AVB



