Anelka?

rigsby · Post by **rigsby** » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:19 pm

How many games have each of them started though?

Doesn't this essentially answer why Bent is better.

SpanishJoe · Post by **SpanishJoe** » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:21 pm

augie said of Anelka 'if his attitude was right'.
Bit like saying I'd sign him if he was English. Sadly, his attitude has always been shit. I agree he has the skill and, for the rest of the season, I'd have him here but you can't separate a twat from his twatness.

Boomer · Post by **Boomer** » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:24 pm

rigsby wrote:
How many games have each of them started though?
Doesn't this essentially answer why Bent is better.

No - Because How many games did Squaichi play compared to Frank McClintock last season. I know who I'd still rather see in defence.

Rosie_titters · Post by **Rosie_titters** » Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:46 pm

he's biggest asset was his pace, and he hasn't got that no more - he is a better option than Chamakh or Park

but rather Wenger spends Anelka's wages on buying a half decent forward in January.

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:59 pm

Rosie_titters wrote:he's biggest asset was his pace, and he hasn't got that no more - he is a better option than Chamakh or Park

but rather Wenger spends Anelka's wages on buying a half decent forward in January.

We've already got a couple of those. Surely a fully decent forward would be preferable?

Anelka?

Re: