Coventry

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

SteveO 35 wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:Bring back Red :barscarf:
Seconded !

Denilson should be coming back

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:
He's been back for a while. :twisted:

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

No way. ted is not Red! 8)

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

armchair supporter wrote:No way. ted is not Red! 8)
I agree. :twisted:

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

Chippy wrote: He's been back for a while. :twisted:
So if its not ted, who is it then.....? :rubchin:

Leyton Gooner
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:34 am
Location: Lokomotiv Plovdiv in the Channel 5 Thursday night cup

Re: Coventry

Post by Leyton Gooner »

Is this just speculation or do you know it's him?

LeftfootlegendGooner
Posts: 10994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by LeftfootlegendGooner »

Leyton Gooner wrote:Is this just speculation or do you know it's him?
Speculation :shock:

We only deal in FACTS on this forum, surely you know that leyt :roll: :lol:

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

Leyton Gooner wrote:Is this just speculation or do you know it's him?
I'm 90% sure I know who it is.

mcdowell42
Posts: 18400
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: Coventry

Post by mcdowell42 »

Its not US Marty is it :shock:

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

mcdowell42 wrote:Its not US Marty is it :shock:
Read the posts again mate! :? :roll: :wink:

father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Coventry

Post by father_ted »

DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!

mcdowell42
Posts: 18400
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: Coventry

Post by mcdowell42 »

Chippy wrote:
mcdowell42 wrote:Its not US Marty is it :shock:
Read the posts again mate! :? :roll: :wink:

Its Augie :lol:

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

father_ted wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!
Did you really bother to type all that out?

We know who you are... father Ted... we know who are...

mcdowell42
Posts: 18400
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: Coventry

Post by mcdowell42 »

Yeah we do.

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

I dont. :(

User avatar
U.F.G Anfield '89
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:26 pm
Location: Royal Holloway University of London

Re: Coventry

Post by U.F.G Anfield '89 »

father_ted wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!
Cool story bro.

Post Reply