Coventry

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

U.F.G Anfield '89 wrote:
Cool story bro.
He not a "bro". Hes a father. Do keep up. :roll:

:wink:

User avatar
wibble
Posts: 1430
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:04 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by wibble »

Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: Coventry

Post by Chippy »

U.F.G Anfield '89 wrote:
father_ted wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!
Cool story bro.
Are you still at RHC? Bloody students! :D :wink:

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

wibble wrote:Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:
I do know who you are. And who you've been with! 8)

father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Coventry

Post by father_ted »

armchair supporter wrote:
U.F.G Anfield '89 wrote:
Cool story bro.
He not a "bro". Hes a father. Do keep up. :roll:

:wink:
You couldn't be more wrong.

User avatar
wibble
Posts: 1430
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:04 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by wibble »

armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:
I do know who you are. And who you've been with! 8)
But your wife promised me she wouldn't tell you about us :-P

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

wibble wrote:
armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:
I do know who you are. And who you've been with! 8)
But your wife promised me she wouldn't tell you about us :-P
:lol:


I seen you drooling over that stripper only to find out she had a cock!!! :lol:
:wink:

father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Coventry

Post by father_ted »

*Edit*

Didn't quote properly

User avatar
wibble
Posts: 1430
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:04 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by wibble »

armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:
armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:
I do know who you are. And who you've been with! 8)
But your wife promised me she wouldn't tell you about us :-P
:lol:


I seen you drooling over that stripper only to find out she had a cock!!! :lol:
:wink:
Outrageous allegation there- you'll not find a classier establishment than a strippers in Sunderland!

Anyway, you promised to never mention 'Lola' again!!

User avatar
safcftm
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: Sunderland!

Re: Coventry

Post by safcftm »

wibble wrote:
armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:
armchair supporter wrote:
wibble wrote:Just to state I got banned shortly after I joined the forum as people 'knew who I was'

This despite the fact I had never joined the forum previously-maybe father ted isn't who you think he is either?!

But feel free to ban him for spouting shit :wink:
I do know who you are. And who you've been with! 8)
But your wife promised me she wouldn't tell you about us :-P
:lol:


I seen you drooling over that stripper only to find out she had a cock!!! :lol:
:wink:
Outrageous allegation there- you'll not find a classier establishment than a strippers in Sunderland!

Anyway, you promised to never mention 'Lola' again!!
Lola's lolly!

father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Coventry

Post by father_ted »

Can you guys not go off topic please. Thank you.

User avatar
wibble
Posts: 1430
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:04 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by wibble »

father_ted wrote:Can you guys not go off topic please. Thank you.
My humblest apologies. Now where were we? Coventry... oh no, my mistake...
I concur with the previous posts-racism is indeed bad.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62210
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Coventry

Post by DB10GOONER »

father_ted wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!
"Seig Heil"? Oh, no... oh no no no... not Godwin's Law... in this day and age? :oops: :lol: :oops: Dear Lord, you really are a dullard. :lol: :oops: You have absolutely no concept of what is and isn't racist. I can't help you little man. Maybe get back to ranting on twitter?

You have contributed nothing to this forum but trolling and displaying a deeply ignorant misunderstanding regarding racism. The ban warning stands. In particular, you have trolled augie on numerous threads and we have been lenient. One more incident of trolling and you're gone.

LeftfootlegendGooner
Posts: 10994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Re: Coventry

Post by LeftfootlegendGooner »

father_ted wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
:lol: :oops: :oops:

I'm actually embarrassed for you Fra- oops, sorry, Father Ted.

Okay, little brain. Let me explain something to you. Stating that someone is Asian when they are indeed Asian, is not racist. Only an absolute pillock with a pathetic agenda would try and convey it so. Now this might come as a shock to you, as you appear to not be able to read and understand the English language too well, but cricket is far more popular amongst Asians than football is. Thus if you've ever been to a game you will notice that very few Asians (sadly) go to football matches. Thusly, my impression is that the family in question (determined by their late arrival, lack of actually watching the game, and early departure) were not that interested in the game, giving me the impression that they possibly got the wrong tickets but were trying to make the best of it. Possibly they were more interested in cricket (or tennis for that matter). This is a possible scenario, not saying it is what happened, but it is possible. "Possible" means something that might have happened. Do you understand that?

We mods were kind of hoping you might be capable of contributing a bit more to this forum than just trolling augie, and we warned you about it, but it seems even that little step up is too much for you. You remain on our watch list. You are literally one troll-type post from a permanent ban, so keep up the good work. :lol:
Stating someone is not Asian is not racist but if it is stated with racist undertones then it becomes racist. I am not accusing you of being a racist, I would rather put it down to ignorance. Perhaps it is a genetic throw back to a very distant great great grandparent from before the days of tolerance that you keep under check for the most part but it allows itself to emerge without you realising. You may not feel like you are racist but your condescending view towards these 'Asians' is racist in it's entirety.
Let me break it down, first you mention they are Asian. Why? Is it relevant at all? Does it matter they are Asian? You list how they behaved during the game. All of these apply to white Londoners who go to the game on a regular basis so why single out and identify an Asian group? If it was a white family who had done it, would you have mentioned they are white? No, not all, it would of been irrelevant, just like the fact this group was Asian is irrelevant.
You make a racial stereotype of them liking cricket. No matter how you try to butter it up or try to make it out to sound charming, a racial stereotype is racist. Full stop. Now this might be shocking for you but guess what, they have football in Asia. I very much doubt these people were so blinded by their love of cricket that they went all out and paid £5+ for a ticket of a team that play a different sport with no connection whatsoever that could have led these people to be confused. They were probably at Ashburton Grove to watch a game of football however they choose to watch it.
They have paid their money for a ticket, why should you be able to tell them how to watch it? If they want to arrive late and leave early while seeming to not pay much attention they are entitled to, why should they have to conform to what you feel a football ticket buying member of the public should behave like? Why single them out in a ground of 55,000+ people of whom i'm sure at least 50%, probably more, would have been acting in a similar manner to these people. (arriving late, not singing or joining in etc… the usual complains of the super fan) Is it because they were Asian? Thus they looked like outsiders and are so are more to blame than the white fans who act in a similar manner?
Of course the scenario you paint is possible but why the need to even mention it? It all seems very academic in the grand scheme of things wether they were Asian or not, it does not even need mentioning as any scenario could have been possible, you know nothing of their circumstances so just mention you did not appreciate how they watched the game, not their race. Not that how they act at a game should have anything to do with you.

I am on your watch list? That is fine by me. I shall have you on my watch list as well. It is funny how you distort things to make me our to be the bad guy. Lets some up it up to how it actually is. I, a new member, picked up on someone's offensive post. You, not just a long time member but a mod on top of that, make the offensive posts and then when called upon rather than apologising and learning from it, tries a weak defence of the offensive material and then threatens the said new member with a ban. Hmmm, sounds a bit like regime that rhymes with tictator.
It is shocking that you are mod despite your continued offensive views on Asians and I think it sums up this forum, the constant banning of new posters who do not follow the protocol of offensive and dimwitted posts or an anti-Wenger regime. If said posters do not confirm to these regulations then they shall be banned. Sieg Heil!
That's uncanny, you do know DB's next book is "Mein Kampf 2" :shock: :lol:

Or "A Hobbits Life For Me", I forget which :? :lol:

armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: Coventry

Post by armchair »

DB10GOONER wrote: "Seig Heil"? Oh, no... oh no no no... not Godwin's Law... in this day and age? :oops: :lol: :oops: Dear Lord, you really are a dullard. :lol: :oops: You have absolutely no concept of what is and isn't racist. I can't help you little man. Maybe get back to ranting on twitter?

You have contributed nothing to this forum but trolling and displaying a deeply ignorant misunderstanding regarding racism. The ban warning stands. In particular, you have trolled augie on numerous threads and we have been lenient. One more incident of trolling and you're gone.
Why dont you like ted? Is it because hes black?
8) :wink: :D

Post Reply