Kim Kallstrom - the saviour? Arsene knows

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ryanswannell
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:47 pm
Location: Treatment Table

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by Ryanswannell »

This story has to be bollocks, surely? I cant believe the has-been would actually sign an injured player to cover our other injured players.

If it's true I hope the media rip him to fucking peices.

User avatar
gp543
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:29 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by gp543 »

Kallstrom to score the winner in his debut at Stoke

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 9937
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by TeeCee »

This is probably the worst thing Wenger has ever done as Arsenal manager. He sites signing a midfielder as necessary for covering the injuries we have but knows BEFORE signing him that he is out for several weeks??

Where is the logic? It should be discussed at board level that the manager is taking on the wages of a player who he knows cannot play for several weeks, as well as spending money and time with the medical dept. treating him? Crazy crazy decision.
Incidentally, the Spartak supporters said he has a back problem......Arsenal should have known that anyway, before he even arrived!! People with back problems do not get over them usually, they improve for a while, then it comes back as bad as ever.

Stunningly bad decision.

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 7878
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by StuartL »

TeeCee wrote:This is probably the worst thing Wenger has ever done as Arsenal manager. He sites signing a midfielder as necessary for covering the injuries we have but knows BEFORE signing him that he is out for several weeks??

Where is the logic? It should be discussed at board level that the manager is taking on the wages of a player who he knows cannot play for several weeks, as well as spending money and time with the medical dept. treating him? Crazy crazy decision.
Incidentally, the Spartak supporters said he has a back problem......Arsenal should have known that anyway, before he even arrived!! People with back problems do not get over them usually, they improve for a while, then it comes back as bad as ever.

Stunningly bad decision.
Perhaps if we hadn't been fucking about for the already crocked top top player, we might have managed to complete a deal for one of the last minute desperate strikers we made loan moves for... :banghead: unbelievable.

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by 1989 »

Wenger needs sacking for this.

User avatar
Dan_85
Posts: 8607
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:09 am
Location: London

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by Dan_85 »

TeeCee wrote:This is probably the worst thing Wenger has ever done as Arsenal manager. He sites signing a midfielder as necessary for covering the injuries we have but knows BEFORE signing him that he is out for several weeks??

Where is the logic? It should be discussed at board level that the manager is taking on the wages of a player who he knows cannot play for several weeks, as well as spending money and time with the medical dept. treating him? Crazy crazy decision.
Incidentally, the Spartak supporters said he has a back problem......Arsenal should have known that anyway, before he even arrived!! People with back problems do not get over them usually, they improve for a while, then it comes back as bad as ever.

Stunningly bad decision.
Exactly.

Me, a nobody who hasn't worked a day in football, can take 10 mins to look this guy up on my phone & see from his basic appearance/playing time stats, as well as the opinions of various media outlets & supporters, that he is a crock.

Yet, Wenger seemingly happily takes him on knowing full well that he can't play for a month at the very very least. Heads would roll for such negligence at any company other than Arsenal.

User avatar
topcat
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:39 pm

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by topcat »

SteveO 35 wrote:
topcat wrote:Welcome kim.

I've heard more about him on fucking championship manager than in real life. But all the best to him, hopefully he helps us win the fa cup!
The FA cup isn't coming

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:
??

Oh no, the guy that said "ozil isn't coming" and thinks "man united are going to finish above us" although we should go FIFTEEN points clear of them tomorrow also thinks we're not going to win the FA cup.

I'm actually delighted you don't think we can win the FA cup.

:barscarf:

User avatar
George71
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:15 pm
Location: South Gloucestershire

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by George71 »

Ryanswannell wrote:This story has to be bollocks, surely? I cant believe the has-been would actually sign an injured player to cover our other injured players.

If it's true I hope the media rip him to fucking peices.
Manure got Dithering David in his first year.
But we have had Arrogant Arsene for 16 years, 16 years of missing out on good players coz he won't pay the price,
now is Draxler going to be snapped up by another club?

But to buy someone who is injured, who was supposed to replace our existing injured players? It takes the piss.

Do any of you remember spitting image?
Is Arsene's brain missing like Ronald Reagan's? :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

User avatar
Peeman
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Wexford, Ireland

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by Peeman »

The wages wasted on this fella and the likes of - u know who they are no need to list them all, would have put a big dent in the £7.5 million extra that c.unty chops didn't want to spend on "The Drac" :roll:

User avatar
The Joy of Cesc
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: South Gloucestershire

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by The Joy of Cesc »

Dan_85 wrote:
TeeCee wrote:This is probably the worst thing Wenger has ever done as Arsenal manager. He sites signing a midfielder as necessary for covering the injuries we have but knows BEFORE signing him that he is out for several weeks??

Where is the logic? It should be discussed at board level that the manager is taking on the wages of a player who he knows cannot play for several weeks, as well as spending money and time with the medical dept. treating him? Crazy crazy decision.
Incidentally, the Spartak supporters said he has a back problem......Arsenal should have known that anyway, before he even arrived!! People with back problems do not get over them usually, they improve for a while, then it comes back as bad as ever.

Stunningly bad decision.

Exactly.

Me, a nobody who hasn't worked a day in football, can take 10 mins to look this guy up on my phone & see from his basic appearance/playing time stats, as well as the opinions of various media outlets & supporters, that he is a crock.

Yet, Wenger seemingly happily takes him on knowing full well that he can't play for a month at the very very least. Heads would roll for such negligence at any company other than Arsenal.
6 weeks according to Sky Sports News, so we won't be seeing him any time soon. And that of course is only if there are no mysterious setbacks during his recovery .....

User avatar
Red Gunner
Posts: 5778
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: London

Post by Red Gunner »

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. This is beyond parody!

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by northbank123 »

I took a very resigned view to this window and knew we wouldn't sign the striker we needed.

But signing an over-the-hill permacrock from the 3rd best team in a dross league who hasn't played 90 minutes for over 3 months and is injured for over a month to cover for a 3-match ban and short-term injuries?

Wenger is a *word censored*, end of.

Leyton Gooner
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:34 am
Location: Lokomotiv Plovdiv in the Channel 5 Thursday night cup

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by Leyton Gooner »

northbank123 wrote:I took a very resigned view to this window and knew we wouldn't sign the striker we needed.

But signing an over-the-hill permacrock from the 3rd best team in a dross league who hasn't played 90 minutes for over 3 months and is injured for over a month to cover for a 3-match ban and short-term injuries?

Wenger is a *word censored*, end of.
And yet the vast majority will still defend the *word censored* to the hilt :banghead:

User avatar
storrmin571
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: PONTYPANDY FIRE STATION

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by storrmin571 »

6 weeks! 6 cocking weeks! Why did we sign Diaby mark 2? It's fucinng criminal negligence!

User avatar
Ryanswannell
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:47 pm
Location: Treatment Table

Re: Club agrees loan move for Kim Kallstrom

Post by Ryanswannell »

When I'm at work later, I'm going to find a peice of 3 years out of date, broken stock in the warehouse. and put it on the shelf in full view of my manager. Hopefully he'll give me £3million at the end of the year. :barscarf:

Post Reply