As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Listen to the CIC's post match interview today - he stressed that he got the guy on a FREE LOAN and also that spartak have agreed to SHARE COST OF HIS TREATMENT........it's all about the fcuking money with this £8m per season w*nker Btw he also added that it was either kallstrom or nobody - no plan B in transfers either eh
topcat wrote:So many people saying wenger should be sacked on paying to loan a player that is injured and how deluded he is for doing it.
Well it turns out that we're not paying him untill he's fit. At least thats cleared up.
Ah thts,alright then there was me thinking buying a player who was already injured and cant play for at least the month of feb was silly,fuck not being in football for 30 years wht the fuck would i know.
topcat wrote:So many people saying wenger should be sacked on paying to loan a player that is injured and how deluded he is for doing it.
Well it turns out that we're not paying him untill he's fit. At least thats cleared up.
Ah thts,alright then there was me thinking buying a player who was already injured and cant play for at least the month of feb was silly,fuck not being in football for 30 years wht the fuck would i know.
We haven't payed for him. We don't have to until he's fit, well that's what I've gathered.
topcat wrote:So many people saying wenger should be sacked on paying to loan a player that is injured and how deluded he is for doing it.
Well it turns out that we're not paying him untill he's fit. At least thats cleared up.
Ah thts,alright then there was me thinking buying a player who was already injured and cant play for at least the month of feb was silly,fuck not being in football for 30 years wht the fuck would i know.
We haven't payed for him. We don't have to until he's fit, well that's what I've gathered.
Fine, great. but can't you see how absolutely pointless a signing it was ?? He's injured, we knew about it. but still signed him anyway - by the time he is potentially fit - Flamini, Ramsey, Jack should all be back so he adds absolutely nothing. If you are going to make a signing it should be adding something to improve the team
Topcat you are going down the arsenal route of great not going to cost us anything mentality,we have taken a player on loan who cant play til march to cover injuries we have now,by time hes fit flamini wilshere and diaby will be back (yes i said diaby will be back )
With all the money we have and the supposed facade of being a top club competing with the best...this is all we could muster after a whole month in the transfer window? Utter shambles, if this was the spuds we would be having a right laugh now but it isn't, this is The Arsenal! I cannot believe there are some on here trying to paper over this disgrace...so we may be sharing the cost of this guys treatment...well that's ok then!
He may well be average. But i dont think we've got much to loose to be honest. We're paying him from when he's fit (so lets say march) till the end of the season, so just over 2 months! And he should be back for our hard run, thats our real hard run! Spuds A, Chel A city H...and if hes not back then we dont pay him, simples. If he scores a winner in any game or proves you all wrong and turns out to do a good job for us then it'll turn out to be an ok bit of business i reckon.
topcat wrote:Sharing the cost of the treatment will be peanuts between two clubs.
Ah yes the old Arsenal medical team's patent-pending Peanut TherapyTM.
Thirteen ounces of Sun-Pat lathered over the injured area before said area is amputated, delivered by Dubious Unnamed Taxi Driver Courier and his mysterious black dildo to the Moscow State Circus to be hoovered clean by the trunk of a rabid caged elephant, returned to sender and stuck back on using Chamakh's leftover special hair "glue." Injury miraculously cured, player rehabilitated just in time for a "little setback." Rinse and repeat.
topcat wrote:He may well be average. But i dont think we've got much to loose to be honest. We're paying him from when he's fit (so lets say march) till the end of the season, so just over 2 months! And he should be back for our hard run, thats our real hard run! Spuds A, Chel A city H...and if hes not back then we dont pay him, simples. If he scores a winner in any game or proves you all wrong and turns out to do a good job for us then it'll turn out to be an ok bit of business i reckon.
By that time we should have flamini, Ramsey and Jack back with rosicky, arteta etc around, he will not get near the team then. Absolute waste of time and effort spent in him when we should have been going all out to strengthen for a title push.
topcat wrote:He may well be average. But i dont think we've got much to loose to be honest. We're paying him from when he's fit (so lets say march) till the end of the season, so just over 2 months! And he should be back for our hard run, thats our real hard run! Spuds A, Chel A city H...and if hes not back then we dont pay him, simples. If he scores a winner in any game or proves you all wrong and turns out to do a good job for us then it'll turn out to be an ok bit of business i reckon.
Its not about having nothing to lose ffs. we are currently top, with a huge run of difficult games to come in close succession, we needed to strengthen, to push on, to take the opportunity while we have a slight advantage but instead we meekly hand over the initiative to City.
You keep saying that we can't compete with City / Chelsea - yet right now, we are, we could push them all the way and this may be the best opportunity for us in years to win it, as with all their money they will surely strengthen their already superior squads in the summer as they have money to throw away.
It was now or never...........and guess what Wenker chose ?