Giroud- what's the beef?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62213
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by DB10GOONER »

augie wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
goonersid wrote:
Theoperator wrote:
Herd wrote: Also never underestimate the wrath of the Lord Wenger ,
Too true, in fairness its second only to old whiskynose I suggest
But "whiskynose" didn't stand by useless fucking wankers the likes of Almunia, Flappy, Bendtner and co.
No he had Bebe, Macheda and £20M worth of Anderson to think about instead.


True but he never made any of those his first choice players and would have choked at the thought of allowing one of them to captain his team :roll:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|

User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22754
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by rodders999 »

augie wrote:I'm not a wally basher
A willy basher on the other hand......

:wink:

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48324
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by OneBardGooner »

True but he never made any of those his first choice players and would have choked at the thought of allowing one of them to captain his team :roll:[/quote]

This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters
. :|[/quote]

Never a Truer Word Spoken.

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48324
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by OneBardGooner »

rodders999 wrote:
augie wrote:I'm not a wally basher
A willy basher on the other hand......

:wink:

Aaaaah! I see that's what AKB stands for

A Kock Basher :D :wink:

LeftfootlegendGooner
Posts: 10994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by LeftfootlegendGooner »

OneBardGooner wrote:
rodders999 wrote:
augie wrote:I'm not a wally basher
A willy basher on the other hand......

:wink:

Aaaaah! I see that's what AKB stands for

A Kock Basher :D :wink:
Ah yes I see, so WOB stands for Willy's Out Boys :rubchin: :shock: :lol:

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by kiwomya »

DB10GOONER wrote:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
Give it a rest with all that AKB nonsense. Why is it that it's dragged out any time someone offers an alternative view to the usual Wenger hate and fury? Do you use "AKB" when your not behind your keyboard?

Theoperator
Posts: 2419
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:58 pm
Location: In the tube, rather late again......

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by Theoperator »

DB10GOONER wrote:[, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
I agree but only to a point- Rambo is a good example of where eventually he came good. Forehead seems to be playing well elsewhere- so I assume he is "good" though never did it with us- same maybe for Vela.

Not that I am defending Santoss or Mong for example here, though at £16m Mong must have been good ( :lol: :lol: ) :oops:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62213
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by DB10GOONER »

kiwomya wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
Give it a rest with all that AKB nonsense. Why is it that it's dragged out any time someone offers an alternative view to the usual Wenger hate and fury? Do you use "AKB" when your not behind your keyboard?
Here's a thing, Adolf. Here in the free west I can use whatever words I like. And yes I use it "when not behind my keyboard" - whatever that idiotic question really means. Are you one of those morons that wants to fight other Gooners because they don't pray at the Alter of Arsene? :roll:

I (as I've stated on here numerous times) don't hate Wenger, but I do really dislike the type of fans we now seem to attract that place Wenger above the club as if to want Wenger gone is an act of disloyalty.

Here's some more words you might want me to give a rest to;

Arsenal FC. Not Arsene FC.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62213
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by DB10GOONER »

Theoperator wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:[, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
I agree but only to a point- Rambo is a good example of where eventually he came good. Forehead seems to be playing well elsewhere- so I assume he is "good" though never did it with us- same maybe for Vela.

Not that I am defending Santoss or Mong for example here, though at £16m Mong must have been good ( :lol: :lol: ) :oops:
I take your point. But Rambo is one. One, mate. For me it's not relevant what Vela or Forehead did in a weaker league after they left. This is subjective. They were rubbish for us and Arsene only signs players for us. My point is that Arsene stuck with rubbish players for far longer and played them far more often than Rednose (or nearly any other manager for that matter) would have done. And I think that is what nullifies the AKB (sooooooo sorry, Kiwomya :lol: :censored: ) argument that other managers signed as much rubbish as Arsene. It's how he persisted with the rubbish that pisses me off.

officepest
Posts: 5072
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 am
Location: Lacking a little bit of sharpness in the final third.

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by officepest »

augie wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
goonersid wrote:
Theoperator wrote:
Herd wrote: Also never underestimate the wrath of the Lord Wenger ,
Too true, in fairness its second only to old whiskynose I suggest
But "whiskynose" didn't stand by useless fucking wankers the likes of Almunia, Flappy, Bendtner and co.
No he had Bebe, Macheda and £20M worth of Anderson to think about instead.


True but he never made any of those his first choice players and would have choked at the thought of allowing one of them to captain his team :roll:
He tried pretty fucking hard with Anderson mate. :lol: Until, that was, he realised he was a useless fat bastard on par with Legohead.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30984
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by augie »

DB10GOONER wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
Give it a rest with all that AKB nonsense. Why is it that it's dragged out any time someone offers an alternative view to the usual Wenger hate and fury? Do you use "AKB" when your not behind your keyboard?
Here's a thing, Adolf. Here in the free west I can use whatever words I like. And yes I use it "when not behind my keyboard" - whatever that idiotic question really means. Are you one of those morons that wants to fight other Gooners because they don't pray at the Alter of Arsene? :roll:

I (as I've stated on here numerous times) don't hate Wenger, but I do really dislike the type of fans we now seem to attract that place Wenger above the club as if to want Wenger gone is an act of disloyalty.

Here's some more words you might want me to give a rest to;

Arsenal FC. Not Arsene FC.


Problem is, that outside knackertown (aka Dublin) no c.unt understand what he is saying - it's like a new dialect that only other Dublin scumbags and the piebald ponies on the shithole estates can understand :wink: :lol:

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48324
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by OneBardGooner »

LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:
OneBardGooner wrote:
rodders999 wrote:
augie wrote:I'm not a wally basher
A willy basher on the other hand......

:wink:

Aaaaah! I see that's what AKB stands for

A Kock Basher :D :wink:
Ah yes I see, so WOB stands for Willy's Out Boys :rubchin: :shock: :lol:

Certainly Does - Just ask rodders he's an adept in that dept. :barscarf:

We get em out we just don't put em in wengers hands unlike Kock Bashers :lol:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62213
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by DB10GOONER »

augie wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
Give it a rest with all that AKB nonsense. Why is it that it's dragged out any time someone offers an alternative view to the usual Wenger hate and fury? Do you use "AKB" when your not behind your keyboard?
Here's a thing, Adolf. Here in the free west I can use whatever words I like. And yes I use it "when not behind my keyboard" - whatever that idiotic question really means. Are you one of those morons that wants to fight other Gooners because they don't pray at the Alter of Arsene? :roll:

I (as I've stated on here numerous times) don't hate Wenger, but I do really dislike the type of fans we now seem to attract that place Wenger above the club as if to want Wenger gone is an act of disloyalty.

Here's some more words you might want me to give a rest to;

Arsenal FC. Not Arsene FC.


Problem is, that outside knackertown (aka Dublin) no c.unt understand what he is saying - it's like a new dialect that only other Dublin scumbags and the piebald ponies on the shithole estates can understand :wink: :lol:
Racist. :censored:


:lol: :wink:

kiwomya
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: London

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by kiwomya »

DB10GOONER wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
This is one of the things that irritates me most about AKB's. You mention the shit Arsene has signed and put on the pitch as first team starters and the AKB's come back with "Yeah, but Ferguson signed X, Y and Z and they were shit...".

The difference being (as augie points out) Ferguson would see a player is shit and bench him, whereas Wenger would just keep playing the same shit players as first teamers over and over. :roll:

Look, every team has shit in their squad. Our problem over the last decade is our shit have far too often been regular first team starters. :|
Give it a rest with all that AKB nonsense. Why is it that it's dragged out any time someone offers an alternative view to the usual Wenger hate and fury? Do you use "AKB" when your not behind your keyboard?
Here's a thing, Adolf. Here in the free west I can use whatever words I like. And yes I use it "when not behind my keyboard" - whatever that idiotic question really means. Are you one of those morons that wants to fight other Gooners because they don't pray at the Alter of Arsene? :roll:

I (as I've stated on here numerous times) don't hate Wenger, but I do really dislike the type of fans we now seem to attract that place Wenger above the club as if to want Wenger gone is an act of disloyalty.

Here's some more words you might want me to give a rest to;

Arsenal FC. Not Arsene FC.
Fighting others? Place Wenger above the club? What, because I said Ferguson signed some shit players?

Throw the "AKB" blanket around over anything you like mate. Seems there's an agenda around the Gooner echo chamber anyway.

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48324
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Giroud- what's the beef?

Post by OneBardGooner »

By agenda you mean free thinking individuals who have seen through the illusion that wenger has managed to erect since he became out of date with regards advancements in football: Training techniques, Tactics and Chageable Formations in order to counteract an oppositions play and system.

:roll:

Post Reply