I think I would prefer to give Campbell a chance there before I'd even contemplate Welbeck, is that how far we have fallen... wanting to sign second rate Manure cast-offsGranadaJoe wrote:Welbeck?


I think I would prefer to give Campbell a chance there before I'd even contemplate Welbeck, is that how far we have fallen... wanting to sign second rate Manure cast-offsGranadaJoe wrote:Welbeck?
If were going to start using the time machine again, I think there's a damn site more than Ray Parlour that we could knock a few years off... Pires, Bergkamp, Henry, Vieira, Brady, Adams, George.... the list is endless.milesgooner wrote:We could do with sticking Ray Parlour in a time machine! Milner and Welback are not players that set the pulses racing but you tell them to do a defensive shift and they will run all day for you. Horses for courses etc etc
I was just having the same thought regarding the Romford Pele, how we could do with him right nowmilesgooner wrote:We could do with sticking Ray Parlour in a time machine! Milner and Welback are not players that set the pulses racing but you tell them to do a defensive shift and they will run all day for you. Horses for courses etc etc
Yeah shearer is a prick no doubt, hates both manure and arsenal.Bradywasking wrote:Alan Shearer is a moron...only pundit across three channels that I watched game/highlights on that didn't call a foul in build up to second goal..in fact he "loved it"...Secondly if Naismith had punched the ball in for the second goal the build up would have been irrelevant , so by the same token the fact he was offside should make the build up irrelevant.
I don't agree with this, it implies that we had some special perseverance or drive yesterday when the two goals were the end product of the team going through the motions like they had done for the previous 83 minutes. Ramsey's goal was a bit of a miracle given he was the only Arsenal player in the box against 6 defenders and Giroud's goal was just an aimless cross from Monreal. Both could have been prevented if Distin had positioned himself correctlyThere are lots of questions to be asked of the first half but I would think that every side save for City (and possibly chelsea, although not convinced about that yet) could not have gotten a point in that scenario.
trustno10 wrote:I don't agree with this, it implies that we had some special perseverance or drive yesterday when the two goals were the end product of the team going through the motions like they had done for the previous 83 minutes. Ramsey's goal was a bit of a miracle given he was the only Arsenal player in the box against 6 defenders and Giroud's goal was just an aimless cross from Monreal. Both could have been prevented if Distin had positioned himself correctlyThere are lots of questions to be asked of the first half but I would think that every side save for City (and possibly chelsea, although not convinced about that yet) could not have gotten a point in that scenario.
You're missing the point. The team showed no particular quality to come back yesterday, anyone who sees it as a demonstration of character or step up from last season's capitulation is deluding themselveskiwomya wrote:trustno10 wrote:I don't agree with this, it implies that we had some special perseverance or drive yesterday when the two goals were the end product of the team going through the motions like they had done for the previous 83 minutes. Ramsey's goal was a bit of a miracle given he was the only Arsenal player in the box against 6 defenders and Giroud's goal was just an aimless cross from Monreal. Both could have been prevented if Distin had positioned himself correctlyThere are lots of questions to be asked of the first half but I would think that every side save for City (and possibly chelsea, although not convinced about that yet) could not have gotten a point in that scenario.whereas Evertons goals could have been prevented it Ozil picked up Coleman and the linesman had his glasses on. Its pretty easy to point out the deficiencies after the event.
????????trustno10 wrote:You're missing the point. The team showed no particular quality to come back yesterday, anyone who sees it as a demonstration of character or step up from last season's capitulation is deluding themselveskiwomya wrote:trustno10 wrote:I don't agree with this, it implies that we had some special perseverance or drive yesterday when the two goals were the end product of the team going through the motions like they had done for the previous 83 minutes. Ramsey's goal was a bit of a miracle given he was the only Arsenal player in the box against 6 defenders and Giroud's goal was just an aimless cross from Monreal. Both could have been prevented if Distin had positioned himself correctlyThere are lots of questions to be asked of the first half but I would think that every side save for City (and possibly chelsea, although not convinced about that yet) could not have gotten a point in that scenario.whereas Evertons goals could have been prevented it Ozil picked up Coleman and the linesman had his glasses on. Its pretty easy to point out the deficiencies after the event.