
Danny Henry
i sent my manc BIL back his text from deadline day "you'll get nothing from welbeck apart from awkward flicks and failed dummies"SPUDMASHER wrote: The Mancs must be gutted.
he started and finished. lovely weighted pass - very bergkampesque - Ozil ?1989 wrote:
Fantastic movement, top class finish.
clockender1 wrote:he started and finished. lovely weighted pass - very bergkampesque - Ozil ?1989 wrote:
Fantastic movement, top class finish.
eating those words and loving every bite!dPmunky wrote:.....welbeck is good but i dont think he's what we need
He must've been thinking of Giroud...clockender1 wrote:i sent my manc BIL back his text from deadline day "you'll get nothing from welbeck apart from awkward flicks and failed dummies"SPUDMASHER wrote: The Mancs must be gutted.
![]()
smug. yep.
This is the ONLY sensible post in the last couple of pages.augie wrote:I think we should hold off reincarnating wellbeck as the new henry even though he took his goals really well last nightThe test for wellbeck will be games against the likes of the chavs where he might only get 1 chance in the game and he has to show that he can take it - last saturday against the scum he got one chance in the game and he could do was have a fresh air shot at goals
![]()
Seems like the manc was on to somethingRoscommonGooner wrote:I have to say that I was underwhelmed when we signed him but I read a piece by some Manc who was crying about him going to us, he pointed out that even when being played out of position he tried his best and, more importantly, when he did get a chance to play through the middle last Christmas when Rooney and RvP were injured he scored 6 in 6 games. Granted they were against (even compared to Utd last season) average teams, Villa(2), West Ham, Norwich, the Vermin and Swansea but the fact is when he was played in position he scored. So I'm hopefull.
That said, the genius will probably play him on the left with Sanogo up front
I Hate Hleb wrote:For fuck sakes - No-one has said he is as good as Henry was!!![]()
![]()
However surely people can see the comparisons in the pace and the style of finish?
He's only played a few games for us and for me has done a good job and is looking like a fantastic signing, so can't we for once just give a guy a bit of credit for playing very well and showing a lot of promising signs for the present and future rather than rehashing missed chances?
![]()
![]()
![]()
By the way, if the criteria is doing it in the 'big games' and against the 'best opposition' than some would argue Henry's failure to score (or indeed play well) in any of the numerous finals he played for us would affect how he good he should be considered.
(Fuck, now you've gone and made me have an inadvertent dig at one of our greatest ever players.*word censored*!!
)
![]()
![]()
Ditto here too Hlebby muthafucka!augie wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:For fuck sakes - No-one has said he is as good as Henry was!!![]()
![]()
However surely people can see the comparisons in the pace and the style of finish?
He's only played a few games for us and for me has done a good job and is looking like a fantastic signing, so can't we for once just give a guy a bit of credit for playing very well and showing a lot of promising signs for the present and future rather than rehashing missed chances?
![]()
![]()
![]()
By the way, if the criteria is doing it in the 'big games' and against the 'best opposition' than some would argue Henry's failure to score (or indeed play well) in any of the numerous finals he played for us would affect how he good he should be considered.
(Fuck, now you've gone and made me have an inadvertent dig at one of our greatest ever players.*word censored*!!
)
![]()
![]()
Did I not always argue that point when I first joined this madhouse ?![]()