http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... e-ministryThe Romanian champions, Steaua Bucharest, were stripped of their name, colours and emblem last week and for Sunday’s victory over CSMS Iasi, but they have been handed a reprieve for Thursday’s Europa League match with Dynamo Kiev.
Romania’s most famous club, who were founded in 1947 as an army side, had their registration cancelled by Romania’s highest court on Wednesday after losing a battle over their trademark with the country’s defence ministry.
The ministry had first resorted to law in 2011, saying the club had used the Steaua brand illegally since 2004. The court verdict effectively left the most popular and successful club in Romanian football as a team with no name.
The 1986 European champions, playing in yellow instead of their famous red and blue shirts, were presented on Sunday by the stadium’s announcer as “the champions of Romania”.
They appeared as “hosts” on the scoreboard and the club’s emblem was replaced by an empty square. Steaua was never mentioned.
The name effectively became invisible, removed from all training kits and officials’ suits. The two teams’ names were missing from the teamsheet, which were presented to reporters before Sunday’s clash.
The situation could change, but only if Steaua officials reach an agreement with the defence ministry for the use of the trademark, and indeed, it has allowed the club to use the name, colours and emblem in the Europa League this week.
Steaua’s flamboyant owner, Gigi Becali, and the club’s general manager, Mihai Stoica, are currently serving prison terms for abuse of power.
On the field, the Poland centre back Lukasz Szukala scored the winning goal in the fifth minute of stoppage time with both teams reduced to 10 men after CSMS Iasi’s Branko Grahovac and Steaua’s Andrei Prepelita were sent off in the closing stages.
Steaua, who have won their last five league matches without conceding a goal, top the standings with 43 points from 17 matches, followed by CFR Cluj on 33.
The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
- Arsenal Till I Die
- Posts: 5427
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:06 pm
- Location: North London
The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
Shit. I thought we had it bad!! 

Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
I bet Stan's watching with interest - how to strip a club of its identity in one day.....took him a couple of years to achieve that
- GoonerMuzz
- Posts: 5753
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:53 pm
- Location: Defending is optional
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
Kind of makes Hulls protests seem a bit foolish, at least they still have a name.
Unusual situation though anyone know exactly what 'Steaua' means? why would the defence ministry want to hold the trademark other than for profit..
Unusual situation though anyone know exactly what 'Steaua' means? why would the defence ministry want to hold the trademark other than for profit..

Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
Steaua means star from the communist red star.
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
we are in the same boat,we used to be good old Arsenal proud to say that name,now we are a laughing stock with a cartoon crest and plastic fans 

-
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 am
- Location: Lacking a little bit of sharpness in the final third.
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
I swa the title of the thread and thought Prince had changed his name again. 

Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
To be fair the club was part of the army sports club, when it split the army initially allowed it to use its property (badge, colours etc) but when Gigi Becali took over he got his friends who were running the steaua football association to give him the name etc. without the armys permission before bankrupting the association so that he could form another company called FC Steaua which was completely separate (and completely his) which, understandably, the army werent happy about, hencd the legal action to prevent them from using the strip and badge and such like. Basically Becali sounds like a bit of an arsehole which is a view only supported when you read about him!GoonerMuzz wrote:Kind of makes Hulls protests seem a bit foolish, at least they still have a name.
Unusual situation though anyone know exactly what 'Steaua' means? why would the defence ministry want to hold the trademark other than for profit..
-
- Posts: 6173
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:06 pm
- Location: Cologne
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
That puts it into a bit of context.safcftm wrote:To be fair the club was part of the army sports club, when it split the army initially allowed it to use its property (badge, colours etc) but when Gigi Becali took over he got his friends who were running the steaua football association to give him the name etc. without the armys permission before bankrupting the association so that he could form another company called FC Steaua which was completely separate (and completely his) which, understandably, the army werent happy about, hencd the legal action to prevent them from using the strip and badge and such like. Basically Becali sounds like a bit of an arsehole which is a view only supported when you read about him!GoonerMuzz wrote:Kind of makes Hulls protests seem a bit foolish, at least they still have a name.
Unusual situation though anyone know exactly what 'Steaua' means? why would the defence ministry want to hold the trademark other than for profit..

Make the song difficult, though:
Shit club, no fans, no name, no shirt, no badge...shit club, no fans, no name, no shirt, no badge

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62208
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
officepest wrote:I swa the title of the thread and thought Prince had changed his name again.



Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
"Got no name... got no badge... got no shirt... you want shum cos i'll give you it, you want shum?"arseofacrow wrote:That puts it into a bit of context.safcftm wrote:To be fair the club was part of the army sports club, when it split the army initially allowed it to use its property (badge, colours etc) but when Gigi Becali took over he got his friends who were running the steaua football association to give him the name etc. without the armys permission before bankrupting the association so that he could form another company called FC Steaua which was completely separate (and completely his) which, understandably, the army werent happy about, hencd the legal action to prevent them from using the strip and badge and such like. Basically Becali sounds like a bit of an arsehole which is a view only supported when you read about him!GoonerMuzz wrote:Kind of makes Hulls protests seem a bit foolish, at least they still have a name.
Unusual situation though anyone know exactly what 'Steaua' means? why would the defence ministry want to hold the trademark other than for profit..![]()
Make the song difficult, though:
Shit club, no fans, no name, no shirt, no badge...shit club, no fans, no name, no shirt, no badge
- rodders999
- Posts: 22751
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Diamond Club
Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
To be fair he sorted that old lady with the hat shop in Spain out fairly prontoSteveO 35 wrote:I bet Stan's watching with interest - how to strip a club of its identity in one day.....took him a couple of years to achieve that

Re: The Club Formally Known As Steaua Bucharest
Hmmm so Steaua Bucharest have lost their name and their colours?
Almost the exact opposite of what’s happened to us. The club's name and colours are pretty much the only thing we haven’t lost.
Almost the exact opposite of what’s happened to us. The club's name and colours are pretty much the only thing we haven’t lost.