Oh right. So it was a case of omission right? Ok. It's weird because what needs to be listed seems quite selective to you.DB10GOONER wrote:Double sigh.Ikechukwu1 wrote:
Sigh. Read the last part again where 2 options are clearly given: option 1, is possibly achieving with AW. Option 2, is finishing outside the Top 4 with Klopp. It's written right there. But sure. "Wum" "invented" etc etc...
Jesus...Are you this simple? Where does he say they are the ONLY two options. He is generalising, saying that for example here's two things that might happen, qualified by "I don't know". Do you need him to list every single possible option for you to understand the post?
![]()
Sigh.
Jesus.
Mohammad.
Etc.
Example, I think Ramsey has improved a lot as a player despite ppl slating him, I think Monreal has improved loads and Coq is a decent DCM. But you see, do I neeeeeed to note everything down? Oh no that's right, you'll draw ur own conclusions based on the stuff that's there. Works both ways - just cos I don't list every positive thing doesn't mean I think it's all negative.
Sigh.