If you had the foggiest idea about basic numbers, you would know that the "net spend" argument is an argument for erm...
Morons. It was discredited some time ago after those deluded Scousers continued to elevate Rafa as some sort of God, ignoring the massive wages he was paying absolute dross (Luis Garcia, Antonio Nunez, Paletta, Voronin - all shite on huge wages. Sound familiar?)
Many books have been written about this (sadly there aren't enough pictures in them, just words and numbers).
The general consensus is that you can look at transfer spends, but wages are the determinant factor.
As an example, Villa, bottom of the table, have spent more on a striker than Arsenal ever have.
Cumulatively, Stoke have spent more on transfers than Everton etc
Liverpool have spent far more on transfers last summer etc.
None of this matters. Wages are the direct correlation with a club's capacity.
You've made a classic AKB attempt to completely change the terms of the truth by getting into "net spend"
Fail. Wenger underperforms and isn't good enough.
Please make sure Arsene has a proper rub-down before you gently exfoliate his buttocks.
Thanks.
