WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
- rodders999
- Posts: 22622
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Diamond Club
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
To see the ball bouncing off his shins and out for a throw in is truely one of the most depressing sites in football. The guy is gonna retire a multi millionaire for being absolute pony at football. Unreal.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Why does even a simple,no pace 3 yard pass get tangle up between his legs.Then bounce out for throw in or re-bound to opp?.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
#Blade wrote:Why does even a simple,no pace 3 yard pass get tangle up between his legs.Then bounce out for throw in or re-bound to opp?.
Oh, ooh, I know this one, don't tell me, don't tell me.......is it because......he's total horseshit and is stealing a living as a footballer??
I'm right aren't I??


Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Best position? Watching the match in a pub. Sitting down of course, wouldn't want him to get a strain injury standing for 90 mins.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62043
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
I'm still going with "on the wing at Crystal Palace".
10 years of unfulfilled potential. What the absolute fuck? Yeah, yeah, he's a nice bloke and he is probably very marketable for jersey sales in China and Malaysia, and he speaks well. But what about the football part? Isn't a professional footballer supposed to be able to play football?


10 years of unfulfilled potential. What the absolute fuck? Yeah, yeah, he's a nice bloke and he is probably very marketable for jersey sales in China and Malaysia, and he speaks well. But what about the football part? Isn't a professional footballer supposed to be able to play football?


Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Does Crystal Palace deserve that though? I bet feo would score a ton of goals against us as we are so open at he back, he would use his pace against us.DB10GOONER wrote:I'm still going with "on the wing at Crystal Palace".![]()
10 years of unfulfilled potential. What the absolute fuck? Yeah, yeah, he's a nice bloke and he is probably very marketable for jersey sales in China and Malaysia, and he speaks well. But what about the football part? Isn't a professional footballer supposed to be able to play football?![]()
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Best Position? On the bench........................with a park team.casgooner wrote:Best position? Watching the match in a pub. Sitting down of course, wouldn't want him to get a strain injury standing for 90 mins.
How he gets rewarded with a fat 5 year contract is beyond me. If he was at another top club he would really struggle to get a game.
He is fast, he can run quickly and he can run a bit more. That is Walcott summed up. 10 years of what?
Last edited by SPARKSY on Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62043
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
It's an interesting question, Cas. I'm going to reply with; No. No, he wouldn't. One can't really score when the ball either get's left behind as one runs or if one has the first touch of a blind rapist.casgooner wrote:Does Crystal Palace deserve that though? I bet feo would score a ton of goals against us as we are so open at he back, he would use his pace against us.DB10GOONER wrote:I'm still going with "on the wing at Crystal Palace".![]()
10 years of unfulfilled potential. What the absolute fuck? Yeah, yeah, he's a nice bloke and he is probably very marketable for jersey sales in China and Malaysia, and he speaks well. But what about the football part? Isn't a professional footballer supposed to be able to play football?![]()

Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
He's not as fast as he was and he'll only get slower. Players who rely on pace are finished sooner.SPARKSY wrote:Best Position? On the bench........................with a park team.casgooner wrote:Best position? Watching the match in a pub. Sitting down of course, wouldn't want him to get a strain injury standing for 90 mins.
How he gets rewarded with a fat 5 year contract is beyond me. If he was at another top club he would really struggle to get a game.
He is fast, he can run quickly and he can run a bit more. That is Walcott summed up. 10 years of what?
- romfordwisp
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:00 pm
- Location: hertfordshire
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Walcott's best position is left back.....
....left back in the changing room.
... Vote OUT of EU...
....left back in the changing room.
... Vote OUT of EU...
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
cameron326 wrote:Get rid.
He'd have been a superstar at a Europa league level team. He's never quite made the top level. A good footballer with amazing pace, who every couple of seasons for a half dozen games would have us all fooled that he was an amazing footballer. Jokes on us as hes rolling in it.
To say that you are being generous there is a massive, massive understatement - he is an athlete and not related to a footballer


- rodders999
- Posts: 22622
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Diamond Club
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Did they deserve Chamakh? No. Did they deserve Sanogo? Christ no!casgooner wrote: Does Crystal Palace deserve that though?
Do they deserve Wal-Dross? I'm beginning to think Palace may like it up em so it's a yes from me

- Bendtners Drinking Buddy
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 10:53 am
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
The sooner this drip leaves the better - players like Grioud, whilst limited, play to their full potential and work and fight hard and are the ones that attract criticism whilst this fraud gets away scott-free.
3 passes in half an hour last night 3!!!!!! The bloke is a coward and does not deserve to play for Arsenal.
3 passes in half an hour last night 3!!!!!! The bloke is a coward and does not deserve to play for Arsenal.
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Bendtners Drinking Buddy wrote:The sooner this drip leaves the better - players like Grioud, whilst limited, play to their full potential and work and fight hard and are the ones that attract criticism whilst this fraud gets away scott-free.
3 passes in half an hour last night 3!!!!!! The bloke is a coward and does not deserve to play for Arsenal.
Agree with that, when you look at strikers, in which he says he is one, (that is open to debate by the way) they have to be brave, morally brave
Not scared to shoot, Not scared to miss, this bloke will never be a striker, he is still scared in his head long since thought it about him
Big hype merchant, looks the part does not deliver, £140k a week is THEFT, of course one of wengers love children so will ever get shot of him
- LizLeGooner
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:55 pm
Re: WALCOTT - which position is best etc?
Best position? Currently, the bench.