I am still 100% against wenger staying in charge.

VoiceOfReason wrote:A short memory?! That was over 12 years ago FFS! It was obviously a huge achievement, but what relevancy does that have in 2014? How is Wiltord's winner that sealed the title in 2002 going to help us progress as a club today, in 2014?SPUDMASHER wrote: You've got a short memory mate because this is the same manager that beat Manure on their own ground to win a title.
When people were slating AW in 2008, I could understand the 'look what he's done for the club' argument. We'd set the all-time unbeaten record in 2004, won the FA Cup in 2005, and reached the CL Final in 2006. All of those achievements were in recent memory.
Talking about 2002 even then would have been a stretch - but now, it's laughable.
mmmmm..... must.... not... make.... ewok.... joke.... urrrrrrr.... mmmm....OneBardGooner wrote:Soooo I'll try Again.
I am still 100% against wenger staying in charge.
goonertux wrote:Back on thread - Agree 100% time for change. And anyone who still says we play attractive, exciting football needs the head examined. Very formulaic, predictable and one-paced.
DB10GOONER wrote:mmmmm..... must.... not... make.... ewok.... joke.... urrrrrrr.... mmmm....OneBardGooner wrote:Soooo I'll try Again.
I am still 100% against wenger staying in charge.![]()
Some will be peeved. Mostly the gay dwarves. Mostly.rodders999 wrote:I hope people aren't peeved by my constant mentioning of Natalie Sawyer (100% FOR) in every thread including this Wenger (100% AGAINST) one.
How about you come up with some fresh jokes then, pal, instead of moaning your tips off.goonertux wrote:That's what was implied. And it's not the first time either. I'm just saying the same old jokes are getting very boring, in fact that's where they do resemble a pub, in the same way that the pub bore who keeps repeating the same gags and insults becomes a very lonely drunk in the corner!
have to agree,its a snore fest most of the timegoonertux wrote:Back on thread - Agree 100% time for change. And anyone who still says we play attractive, exciting football needs the head examined. Very formulaic, predictable and one-paced.
That is my opinion. I don't see how it negates further debate. If anyone can justify the attractive, exciting argument then let's hear their opinion.LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:goonertux wrote:Back on thread - Agree 100% time for change. And anyone who still says we play attractive, exciting football needs the head examined. Very formulaic, predictable and one-paced.
Mmmm. You bitch and whine when you bemoan posters going off topic and complain that this is a forum about football for DEBATE, yet fundamentally negating any subsequent debate by stating any poster that DISAGREES with you is mental![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I know Irony is not understood by many people but you do get it, don't you
I mostly see my pecker in her if I'm being honestSPUDMASHER wrote:Not peeved at all mate, you just mention here whenever you want
..although what you see in her is beyond me
i think we can all remember at some time or another being in love with a pair of tremendous knockers rodders, so you get a pass on that one pal.rodders999 wrote:I hope people aren't peeved by my constant mentioning of Natalie Sawyer (100% FOR) in every thread including this Wenger (100% AGAINST) one.
Bang on. Sick of Wenger sympathisers banging on about the beautiful football, speak the same lies enough you start to believe them yourself!goonertux wrote:Back on thread - Agree 100% time for change. And anyone who still says we play attractive, exciting football needs the head examined. Very formulaic, predictable and one-paced.