FCUK YOU DEIN
- Cockerill's chin
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets
- thatgooner
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:19 pm
-
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:19 am
- Location: Agog in the æther.
- Contact:
I just read on the BBC that the fat Bastard actually considered buying into Spurs first, but decided that 'cos he was an Arsenal 'fan' , decided to invest here!!!
Oh he also says he wants to invest because Wenger is "the best manager in the world"
Make no mistake lads, this guy has a long term agenda.
HE WANTS ARSENAL FC.

Oh he also says he wants to invest because Wenger is "the best manager in the world"
Make no mistake lads, this guy has a long term agenda.
HE WANTS ARSENAL FC.

-
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Leyton by way of Hackney
Can I just say that to say that DEin sold out to usmanov out of greed or to destroy the club is utter utter bullshit. DD sold out to usmanov cos he wanted to attach himself to somebody/anybody with enough financial clout to pursue his dream of taking over the club again. So while we all can & will all knock him for the choice he made here there is no point talking shite about his motives
Thus David Dein is doing what he is very goot at - promoting himself and he wants to have power again at the top level of English and European Football (FA Board, UEFA G14)augie wrote:Can I just say that to say that DEin sold out to usmanov out of greed or to destroy the club is utter utter bullshit. DD sold out to usmanov cos he wanted to attach himself to somebody/anybody with enough financial clout to pursue his dream of taking over the club again. So while we all can & will all knock him for the choice he made here there is no point talking shite about his motives
If his only motive is as you set out, then he obviously hasn't considered the motives of Usmanov or his past, and the possibility of de-stabilising the club.
Would you accept Arsenal being controlled by this man (Usmanov) regardless of Dein's involvment?
Sorry Augie, the utter bullshit is the naivety of believing that DD banked £75million for any reason other than feathering his own nest.augie wrote:Can I just say that to say that DEin sold out to usmanov out of greed or to destroy the club is utter utter bullshit. DD sold out to usmanov cos he wanted to attach himself to somebody/anybody with enough financial clout to pursue his dream of taking over the club again. So while we all can & will all knock him for the choice he made here there is no point talking shite about his motives
I don't think DD wanted to destroy the club, I just don't think he cared nearly as much about the club or us as much as his own financial interests. Perhaps that's fair enough, it might be silly to say he should sacrifice such an enormous payday for the sake of a football club and its fans, but to say he sold his shares for any other reason than greed isextremely naive.
If his only objective was to get money into the club, there are various things he could have done to achieve that short of selling his shares directly to Usmanov. Eg, he could have sold the shares to a joint venture company in which he and the chosen billionaire would have shares, retaining a high degree of control and preventing the club being open to takeover by someone like Usmanov. The only reason he didn't do that is to achieve the highest sale price. And bugger the club and us.
- Cockerill's chin
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets
Augie, like you I cannot fail to see the massive positive impact DD made on the club, but his choices since leaving have been worse than misjudged. If he had found Usmanov before Kroenke, we would now have a morally dubious eastern oligarch with 35% of the club's shares.
I cannot readily dismiss the £75million DD got for his shares as playing no part in his motive. Money always plays a significant part, but I agree that his place as chairman of RWH would have been a critical clause for him.
I agree, that DD's motivation is probably that he loves Arsenal so much and thinks he could play such a significant role in the future that he would side with the devil to get back involved. This thinking though is fucked up. He must have a very big opinion of himself if he thinks he can tame the Uzbek to the Arsenal tradition. It wont be the Arsenal he loved that he returns to, but an oligarch's toy.
Precedent has shown at Hearts and Chelsea that control over board affairs is retained by close advisers. Worse still, interference is seen at pitch level. Wenger would not stand for that. Whether it is right or wrong, Wenger has a cult following amongst his playing staff and the effect of him leaving Arsenal acrimoniously would be devastating.
DD either misses his Arsenal so much he has become confused, or thinks so much of his ability to control others he is deluded. I have no faith in a deluded or confused man.
I cannot readily dismiss the £75million DD got for his shares as playing no part in his motive. Money always plays a significant part, but I agree that his place as chairman of RWH would have been a critical clause for him.
I agree, that DD's motivation is probably that he loves Arsenal so much and thinks he could play such a significant role in the future that he would side with the devil to get back involved. This thinking though is fucked up. He must have a very big opinion of himself if he thinks he can tame the Uzbek to the Arsenal tradition. It wont be the Arsenal he loved that he returns to, but an oligarch's toy.
Precedent has shown at Hearts and Chelsea that control over board affairs is retained by close advisers. Worse still, interference is seen at pitch level. Wenger would not stand for that. Whether it is right or wrong, Wenger has a cult following amongst his playing staff and the effect of him leaving Arsenal acrimoniously would be devastating.
DD either misses his Arsenal so much he has become confused, or thinks so much of his ability to control others he is deluded. I have no faith in a deluded or confused man.
100% agree with you cocks chin when you say that DD's thinking is totally fucked up on this issue. I know I have long been a defender of DD but nowhere on my previous post have I taken that position cos his choice of "bedmate" here is repulsive to us all. All I said in my posting is that he didnt sell the shares to make a killing or screw the club cos if he did he would not have insisted on being chairman of Red & White Holdings. He has "got into bed" with usmanov in an effort to gain control of our club again and as much as I would like to see his return I would never want to see Usmanov own our club so before some of you quote me in your responses please read my opinions as they stand now not as they were pre usmanov cos I think you will find them quite similar to your own
- Cockerill's chin
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets
Augie
Did anyone on the forum, as you suggest, seriously say that Dein sold out to destroy the club?
If they did, then that IS fucked up. But the point is more that people are worried that "destroying the club" will be the indirect consequence of what he has done. More than the money, I see Dein as being interested in the prestige possibilities he sees.
I would have liked to have to have seen Dein back at the club because of the working relationship with AW and his expertise in football admin and his schmoozing skills. But, this was always on the basis, as I posted at least 3 months ago, of what baggage came along with him.
What he is doing and has done in trying to tie himself to anyone who would allow him a way back to the club, without considering the consequences - consequences which are not without foundation - is not putting the best interests of the club at heart.
And as much as you might despise the board, and if they do sell up and the back of huge profits - I say FUCK 'EM - as I posted before. But, we have stability and progress and sometimes it's better the devil you know.
Did anyone on the forum, as you suggest, seriously say that Dein sold out to destroy the club?
If they did, then that IS fucked up. But the point is more that people are worried that "destroying the club" will be the indirect consequence of what he has done. More than the money, I see Dein as being interested in the prestige possibilities he sees.
I would have liked to have to have seen Dein back at the club because of the working relationship with AW and his expertise in football admin and his schmoozing skills. But, this was always on the basis, as I posted at least 3 months ago, of what baggage came along with him.
What he is doing and has done in trying to tie himself to anyone who would allow him a way back to the club, without considering the consequences - consequences which are not without foundation - is not putting the best interests of the club at heart.
And as much as you might despise the board, and if they do sell up and the back of huge profits - I say FUCK 'EM - as I posted before. But, we have stability and progress and sometimes it's better the devil you know.
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:09 pm
Augie, you are talking shite about his motives.there is no point talking shite about his motives
David Dein's only interest was the money.
You are like a little mo type battered wife making excuses for her Trevor.
I have warned about Dein since the start, this was exactly the type of shit the greedy little *word censored* is capable of.
I bet if Dein has a beloved pet cat or dog it would be spinning around on one of those things in a kebab shop if the owner made the right offer.
Cus you are truely one eyed
Dein's greedy motives are for the greed of power and not the £75m he got for his shares. If it was just about the money then why stay involved with red & white holdings ? If you want to have a pop at the man at least do so for the right reasons - it is not as if he hasnt given you a big enough reason 


-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:09 pm
-
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: The Fourth Dimension!
Augie we at least agree on that point, this is indeed, IMO anyway, largely about control of AFC, but the simple fact is that in pursuing his own personal ambitions he has put the club at risk by selling his only stake in the thing he professes to love to someone like Usmanov and half hoping that the Grove project would fail and that is completely unacceptable!