Nasri Contract situation

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

Nasri = Judas
Top
mikeyb772001
Posts: 4569
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:03 pm
Location: Block 6! Drunk and standing next to a mad man with no clothes on!

Post by mikeyb772001 »

1989 wrote:Nasri = Judas
on a positive note i think clichy is going liverpool for 6 mil
Top
User avatar
SWLGooner
Posts: 10483
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Post by SWLGooner »

Nasri for ten million to the Munichs and that's it for me til Wenger goes. We would be even more of a fucking laughing stock.
Top
gunner_ace
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:52 am
Location: leeds

Post by gunner_ace »

10 mill??? fuck off you cheeky munchin *word censored*. Even with 1 year left on the contract he must be worth double at least. especially if cahill's been touted round at £17m with a year left too.
Top
User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Post by MK Gould »

1989 wrote:Nasri = Judas
Maybe we should wait to see if it happens first...... By all accounts Nasri has only been voicing the same concerns as 95% of people on this forum!
Top
User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Post by QuartzGooner »

No player should be allowed to get down to just one year left on a contract unless they are not playing well and the club wants to make it easy for them to leave.
Top
User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

MK Gould wrote:
1989 wrote:Nasri = Judas
Maybe we should wait to see if it happens first...... By all accounts Nasri has only been voicing the same concerns as 95% of people on this forum!
Exactly.

We're allowed to question the direction of the club, but players aren't?

I'm still hopeful he stays, and in the absence of any real proof - I for one will refrain from all this judas nonsense. He's got every right to question whether he should stay or not - it's his career and, as far as I'm aware, he's obeyed the rules of his contract.

We demand loyalty from players, yet many fans turn on players and abuse them with little proof of their wrongdoings... it's twisted. :?
Top
User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

I'm disgusted.
Top
User avatar
DUFFMAN
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: US Martian's waffle factory

Post by DUFFMAN »

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:I'm disgusted.
I second that.

This thread was goin along nicely and then us Martian turns up and it's fucked. Can't we just take our thread and go home
Last edited by DUFFMAN on Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
SWLGooner
Posts: 10483
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Post by SWLGooner »

g88ner wrote: We're allowed to question the direction of the club, but players aren't?
.
Basically, YES.
Top
User avatar
DUFFMAN
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: US Martian's waffle factory

Post by DUFFMAN »

SWLGooner wrote:
g88ner wrote: We're allowed to question the direction of the club, but players aren't?
.
Basically, YES.
We pay for the right to have an opinion

They are paid for the right to shut the fuck up and do their talking on the pitch
Top
User avatar
SWLGooner
Posts: 10483
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Post by SWLGooner »

DUFFMAN wrote:
We pay for the right to have an opinion

They are paid for the right to shut the fuck up and do their talking on the pitch
This. And if they have a concern they can fucking well tell Wenger in private? If you're fucked off with your job do you mouth off to the nearest journo? Do you fuck.
Top
User avatar
augie
Posts: 30987
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

g88ner wrote:
MK Gould wrote:
1989 wrote:Nasri = Judas
Maybe we should wait to see if it happens first...... By all accounts Nasri has only been voicing the same concerns as 95% of people on this forum!
Exactly.

We're allowed to question the direction of the club, but players aren't?

I'm still hopeful he stays, and in the absence of any real proof - I for one will refrain from all this judas nonsense. He's got every right to question whether he should stay or not - it's his career and, as far as I'm aware, he's obeyed the rules of his contract.

We demand loyalty from players, yet many fans turn on players and abuse them with little proof of their wrongdoings... it's twisted. :?

I dont mind players questioning the direction of the club except in this case where I feel that there are 2 exceptions -

1. He is looking for big money and parity with cesc - if it is about the club's ambition then fine but dont make it about the money as well cos that makes it look that you are willing to sell your beliefs for a few dollars more so it is either about money or ambition.....cant be both imo

2. Nasri should be having a severe look at himself when it comes to why the club is winning fcuk all - he had a great first 3 months to last season but then, as has often proved to be the case since he arrived, he went missing :roll: When we needed somebody to step up to the plate in big games he hid and for an experienced international and one of the best players in the team that is just not good enough :evil:
Top
User avatar
Glitch33
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: No longer Gold

Post by Glitch33 »

MK Gould wrote:
1989 wrote:Nasri = Judas
Maybe we should wait to see if it happens first...... By all accounts Nasri has only been voicing the same concerns as 95% of people on this forum!
Exactly. Nasri clearly has greater ambition than the club and like us bitterly disappointed at the way things have been going in the last few seasons.

Why wouldn't he want to bail out if he he is fed up with repeated failure.

He is one of our best players by some distance and a great loss if he does go.

I don't see how AW is going to get out of this situation which now looks worse than ever.

Other top teams are buying big and will be slip behind.
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22153
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Post by SteveO 35 »

gunner_ace wrote:10 mill??? fuck off you cheeky munchin c**ts. Even with 1 year left on the contract he must be worth double at least. especially if cahill's been touted round at £17m with a year left too.
Ashley Young only has one year left on his deal and is supposedly going for no less than £16m. I like Young, but with Nasri's reputation....FFS he was a player of the year contender......if Arsenal can not secure at least an equivalent fee, then Gazidis and his commercial wankers should be put in the stocks before the first home game of the season.

So if rumours are to be believed - and I don't often believe them, but with Gazidis the appalling track record makes it quite conceivable, we could:

Lose Clichy for £5m
Lose Nasri for around £10m
Eventually buckle and flog our captain for a couple of Barca fringe players and around £20-£25m

Good luck improving the squad once those 3 have left and we have £40m to do it with (plus a couple of never will be's from the card waving cheats)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “On the Terraces”