Which of the Current squad ARE good enough

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10027
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Post by TeeCee »

This time next year Frimpong and Miyaichi will be among those who are good enough to start.
But Van Persie will be off by then!
:roll:

User avatar
Rugby Gooner
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Rugby

Post by Rugby Gooner »

RVP,TV,Wilshire,Sagna,Chesney,(the one and only.....why have we not done that song yet?),Frimpong, Gervinho,and maybe Walcott,(if played in the middle).

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Post by Number 5 »

highburyJD wrote:
Number 5 wrote:only Sagna and Van Persie would get into the teams of those who will be fighting it out for the league this season.
Wilshere gets straight into every single Prem team.
Are you fucking high?

No he don't. Not into the first XI of the 3 teams who will be putting in an actual tilt at the title that lasts until May.

He's a fair player and will have a hell of a future but right now, no.

He gets into our team and that of every other Premiership side first name, but not in with the big boys.

Junkie ass mother fucker. :roll:

User avatar
Exiled-Gooner
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: the spirit of 69!

Post by Exiled-Gooner »

What i think Wenger should do drop the bullshit and tell us what we all know that he's trying to build a winning team on the cheap.So he can keep the following:-The polish geezer in goal(can't prenounce his name),Sagna,TV,Ramsey,Wilshere,Lansbury(needs a chance)Frimpong,Bartley,Walcott(injury free season and needs to prove himself) and sell the rest of the 1st team,yes that means RVP too injury prone and promote all the reserves and say fuck it go out there and give your all.

Probably find that there show more fight ,desire and want to win more than the current lot we got now.

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Post by franksav63 »

1989 wrote:This time next year Frimpong and Miyaichi will be among those who are good enough to start.
Are there even any younger kids that could make the step up??

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Post by highburyJD »

Number 5 wrote:Are you fucking high?

No he don't. Not into the first XI of the 3 teams who will be putting in an actual tilt at the title that lasts until May.

He's a fair player and will have a hell of a future but right now, no.

He gets into our team and that of every other Premiership side first name, but not in with the big boys.

Junkie ass mother fucker. :roll:
why is your post just personal abuse rather than specifically talking about the players you think are better than Jack?
I think you shouldn't abuse the parents of people you don't know.

ManU played Cleverley and Anderson in their last two fixtures
you seriously would pick BOTH of them ahead of Wilshere?
Carrick was on the bench who can't make the England team ahead of him.
Fletcher played (and lost) v our stiffs on the way back from injury earlier in the week. I think he's under-rated and has a good engine. Still wouldn't think for a second about dropping Wilshere for him. So not one ManUre player better than JW in my opinion. Or are ManU not one of the teams you think will challenge for the league?

Last game Chelski picked Ramires (great engine, not half the player the JW is) Lampard (historically excellent player had his worst season in a deceade last year) and Mikel again slighty under-rated but essentially a negative water carrier. Again I wouldn't drop Wilshere for any single one of them, let alone all three. Can't even see an argument about that for any bar Lampard - in which case Wilshere still makes the team.

ManShitty at least have expensive big names in their team, De Jong and Yaya are extremely powerful and certain managers would put them in on that alone. I can see an argument for picking them first if raw strength is your aim but there's no way in hell I would put Barry ahead of Wilshere, there's nothing he can do that Jack can't do better.

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Post by Number 5 »

highburyJD wrote:
Number 5 wrote:Are you fucking high?

No he don't. Not into the first XI of the 3 teams who will be putting in an actual tilt at the title that lasts until May.

He's a fair player and will have a hell of a future but right now, no.

He gets into our team and that of every other Premiership side first name, but not in with the big boys.

Junkie ass mother fucker. :roll:
why is your post just personal abuse rather than specifically talking about the players you think are better than Jack?
I think you shouldn't abuse the parents of people you don't know.

ManU played Cleverley and Anderson in their last two fixtures
you seriously would pick BOTH of them ahead of Wilshere?
Carrick was on the bench who can't make the England team ahead of him.
Fletcher played (and lost) v our stiffs on the way back from injury earlier in the week. I think he's under-rated and has a good engine. Still wouldn't think for a second about dropping Wilshere for him. So not one ManUre player better than JW in my opinion. Or are ManU not one of the teams you think will challenge for the league?

Last game Chelski picked Ramires (great engine, not half the player the JW is) Lampard (historically excellent player had his worst season in a deceade last year) and Mikel again slighty under-rated but essentially a negative water carrier. Again I wouldn't drop Wilshere for any single one of them, let alone all three. Can't even see an argument about that for any bar Lampard - in which case Wilshere still makes the team.

ManShitty at least have expensive big names in their team, De Jong and Yaya are extremely powerful and certain managers would put them in on that alone. I can see an argument for picking them first if raw strength is your aim but there's no way in hell I would put Barry ahead of Wilshere, there's nothing he can do that Jack can't do better.
I don't know.

Perhaps because I've been stuck in Great Yarmouth for the best part of a week and I fucking hate it here.

Perhaps it's because 4 kids down the line I haven't roggerd the Mrs in over 9 weeks because there hasn't been a good "opportunity"

Maybe I'm just agitated at the fact that I sweat more than a normal human being and require 2 showers a day.

Like I said, I don't know.

But more likely, I'm just hot happy to read utter drivel posted by a dude like you. Even more so when you try to explain yourself in detail and I have to read more of it.

Your comparisons are laughable.

Man Utd are the league Champions what 4 out of the last 5 seasons? Whatever you may think of their midfield individually, collectively those son bitches know how to win.

Same as Chelsea and I'm certain coming up on the rails Man City.

Wilshere may individually be an exceptional player, the only reason I still watch football as often as I do. But he won't be put into a title contending side at this stage in his career.

Last year he posted 1 goal and 3 assists in the Premier League.

Your man Barry, 2 goals and 3 assists.

They came 3rd we came 4th. I'm breaking this down for you as simple as I can.

Which player made a better impact on their teams final standing?

It doesn't matter what you think man to man who is the better player, it's about who makes the team win.

You need to expand your thought process. A lot. Then I might respect you in my tone. But I probably won't cos I'm a rude mother fucker and treat most other guys round here in the same way.

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Post by I Hate Hleb »

Ah, that would explain it. :wink: :lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

9 weeks!!! :shock:

You must have bollocks like Buster Gonad number5 :wink:

User avatar
MickeyFabs
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by MickeyFabs »

You need to expand your thought process. A lot. Then I might respect you in my tone. But I probably won't cos I'm a rude mother fucker and treat most other guys round here in the same way.

What a load of bollocks!

If Jack was for sale tomorrow they would all be in for him.

Your above statement is exactly why you gets no pussssaaay!!!

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Post by Number 5 »

MickeyFabs wrote:You need to expand your thought process. A lot. Then I might respect you in my tone. But I probably won't cos I'm a rude mother fucker and treat most other guys round here in the same way.

What a load of bollocks!

If Jack was for sale tomorrow they would all be in for him.


Your above statement is exactly why you gets no pussssaaay!!!
Yes they would. And do you really think that he would be the lynchpin of their sides the way he now is ours?

Not a fucking chance.

Hence why they win things and we don't.

What, am I teaching the retarded class this term?

:banghead:

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Post by Number 5 »

flash gunner wrote:9 weeks!!! :shock:

You must have bollocks like Buster Gonad number5 :wink:
Two showers a day man. Two showers a day. :lol:

User avatar
MickeyFabs
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by MickeyFabs »

Number 5 wrote:
MickeyFabs wrote:You need to expand your thought process. A lot. Then I might respect you in my tone. But I probably won't cos I'm a rude mother fucker and treat most other guys round here in the same way.

What a load of bollocks!

If Jack was for sale tomorrow they would all be in for him.


Your above statement is exactly why you gets no pussssaaay!!!
Yes they would. And do you really think that he would be the lynchpin of their sides the way he now is ours?

Not a fucking chance.

Hence why they win things and we don't.

What, am I teaching the retarded class this term?

:banghead:
Er, that you gets no pusssaaaay, and that all that sweating is blurring your eyesight, but hey ho!

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Post by Number 5 »

MickeyFabs wrote:
Number 5 wrote:
MickeyFabs wrote:You need to expand your thought process. A lot. Then I might respect you in my tone. But I probably won't cos I'm a rude mother fucker and treat most other guys round here in the same way.

What a load of bollocks!

If Jack was for sale tomorrow they would all be in for him.


Your above statement is exactly why you gets no pussssaaay!!!
Yes they would. And do you really think that he would be the lynchpin of their sides the way he now is ours?

Not a fucking chance.

Hence why they win things and we don't.

What, am I teaching the retarded class this term?

:banghead:
Er, that you gets no pusssaaaay, and that all that sweating is blurring your eyesight, but hey ho!
It's more of an upper body sweat, armpits, chest and neck. Plus obviously the inner thighs down by the ball bags.

But sex is a lot like this place.

Once in a while you cram it in, as much as you can for a good few days. But then you've had enough going over the same old motions again and again so you stop putting in the effort. Then again after a while, you spot the Mrs bending over the washing machine/read a thread like this and you can't resist getting balls deep again.

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Post by franksav63 »

Number 5 wrote:
flash gunner wrote:9 weeks!!! :shock:

You must have bollocks like Buster Gonad number5 :wink:
Two showers a day man. Two showers a day. :lol:
:lol: :lol:

Sounds like you're suffering from your abstinence mate...
:lol:

Post Reply