Arsenal v Manure

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
VoiceOfReason
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:48 pm

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by VoiceOfReason »

DB10GOONER wrote:
VoiceOfReason wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us. :roll:
But in 2009, when RVP was last injured, we hadn't sold all our best players. Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas and the rest of them all jumped ship (regardless of whether or not they were injured). Arsenal in 2012, with all these departures, were displaying lower-than-normal ambition. And that's why RVP wanted to go at that time, IMO. It's not as if we'd just signed Alonso, Villa and Mata (for example). We were signing players below the standard of what we had before, and maybe if that had been the club's policy in 2009 (to such a great extent), he might have been wondering about his future then too.
:oops:

So the ankle injury in August 2010 didn’t happen? Or the knee injury in Feb 2011? Or the reoccurrence of it in March 2011? And he didn’t spend almost half the 2010-2011 season injured? We all imagined that? Thank God! You do the pro-RVJC camp no favours, mate! :lol: :wink:
I'm really talking serious, long-term injuries.

User avatar
Number 5
Posts: 4553
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: DC Universe

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by Number 5 »

DB10GOONER wrote:
augie wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us. :roll:


You just wont let this go will you ? Just admit that you are wrong and we can all let this lie :wink: :lol:
:lol:

He's a judas cúnt. There. We're done. 8) :wink:
Your just pissed off that you still owe me 20 beer vouchers for all the goals he banged in the other year.

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by highburyJD »

was gonna stick my snout in but DB10 has this totally covered
not only on vanPursestrings (sellout user *word censored*)
but also on the pro-DutchSkunkers, who would give character references to crackheads,
as long as it was Wenger's house they burgled

hope next time Mrs vanStaplecunt catches him, she cuts it off

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by northbank123 »

highburyJD wrote:was gonna stick my snout in but DB10 has this totally covered
not only on vanPursestrings (sellout user *word censored*)
but also on the pro-DutchSkunkers, who would give character references to crackheads,
as long as it was Wenger's house they burgled


hope next time Mrs vanStaplecunt catches him, she cuts it off
:lol: :lol:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62052
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by DB10GOONER »

Number 5 wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
augie wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us. :roll:


You just wont let this go will you ? Just admit that you are wrong and we can all let this lie :wink: :lol:
:lol:

He's a judas cúnt. There. We're done. 8) :wink:
Your just pissed off that you still owe me 20 beer vouchers for all the goals he banged in the other year.

:lol:

I do indeed. But I'll just be handing you back the 20 you handed me the year before! :wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62052
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by DB10GOONER »

VoiceOfReason wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
VoiceOfReason wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
I Hate Hleb wrote:Agree with augie. Also, very few players like to 'linger on the treatment table' on purpose.
But some will have no problem doing it if they are being paid silly money and they know no other club will pay them that much or, indeed, want to sign them. That's the crux of the issue for me; RVJC only had a problem with the club's ambition after he got fit enough and raised his value enough to be in a position of strength to bully a move. No problems with our ambition up to that point whilst he sat on his arse collecting his dosh from us. :roll:
But in 2009, when RVP was last injured, we hadn't sold all our best players. Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas and the rest of them all jumped ship (regardless of whether or not they were injured). Arsenal in 2012, with all these departures, were displaying lower-than-normal ambition. And that's why RVP wanted to go at that time, IMO. It's not as if we'd just signed Alonso, Villa and Mata (for example). We were signing players below the standard of what we had before, and maybe if that had been the club's policy in 2009 (to such a great extent), he might have been wondering about his future then too.
:oops:

So the ankle injury in August 2010 didn’t happen? Or the knee injury in Feb 2011? Or the reoccurrence of it in March 2011? And he didn’t spend almost half the 2010-2011 season injured? We all imagined that? Thank God! You do the pro-RVJC camp no favours, mate! :lol: :wink:
I'm really talking serious, long-term injuries.
You wouldn't call missing half the 2010-2011 season a serious or long term injury? :|

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by I Hate Hleb »

Depends. Compared to the spells Rosicky and Diaby had out, you could almost call it a sabbatical!! :-P :lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62052
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by DB10GOONER »

I Hate Hleb wrote:Depends. Compared to the spells Rosicky and Diaby had out, you could almost call it a sabbatical!! :-P :lol: :lol: :wink:
:lol:

I think we'll be waiting a bit longer for Diaby to have his one brilliant season and force a move to Man United though! :lol: :wink:

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 47912
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: Arsenal v Manure

Post by OneBardGooner »

Diaby is NOT injured. he is simply on Secondment to the Medical Team, so he has the skills to follow another career path once his playing days are over...errmmm :rubchin: :rubchin: :rubchin: ...in that case is he now a member of the medical team?. :?

Post Reply