KingHenry wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2023 9:03 pmWhat if Partey hadn't have got injured where would Gabriel be now? Arteta's plan all along was to play Partey at RB. Havertz was bought in to replace Xhaka Rice was bought in to replace Partey in midfield. I wouldn't be surprised if Partey started at RB v ChelseaRetro Gunner wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2023 6:04 pmnut flush gooner wrote: ↑Sat Oct 14, 2023 6:58 amThis is my point, was a bit of shenanigans from his representatives. I am almost certain he had no intention of leaving, but he's pissed Arteta off.Stuart L (2) wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 4:52 pmI didn’t to be fairnut flush gooner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 3:25 pm
Have you looked up his salary Stu? He's on around £100k pw. There's loads of stuff about him being linked away before the transfer window closed. When he signed his contract is irrelevant, apart from his sell on value.
But if he was happy enough to sign up for 4/5 years a year ago he must have been okay with what was offered at the time.
He won’t be in the top earners but it’s hardly chicken feed either, doubt that many clubs would be capable or willing to give him a substantial rise on top of that figure.
I get that Saudi money will turn heads, but he is playing at a top club in the premier league and champions league and has just started getting game time for Brazil ( and a goal![]()
last night )
Plenty of time to wind down on stupid money when you hit 32 or higher ….
He looks committed to the cause when he plays to me, so hopefully it was an issue that has now been sorted.
By the way I agree leaving him out and playing Partey makeshift right back was a shite decision by Arteta, and one I hope we don’t have to suffer again this season.
And Arteta is a genius at spinning things. As soon as Timber got injured he was probably thinking about revisiting Partey as the inverted RB. And used that as an excuse to drop Gabriel. The games he tried the formation out were Forest and Fulham amongst a few others. Arteta probably thought he could get away with it and it kind of bit him in the bum against Fulham. That game in particular looked like the first nail in the coffin for Ramsdale. Lets just get this clear for balance theres a few things Arteta done in terms of team selection and setup that have pissed me off, but I can see both sides of what he is trying the good and bad, unlike some posters on this forum who get off by continually slagging him off no matter what he does.
He has been forced to play our more conventional defence in recent weeks because of injuries, and there is more stability now thank fuck.
He dropped Gabriel and used Partey in the inverted RB position from the start of the Forest game, so nothing to do with Timber getting injured. Gabriel, Tomi and Kiwior were all on the bench, so he had no reason to start Partey in a RB position, other than it was his choice to do so.
Similarly, for the Fulham game, Gabriel and Zinchenko were on the bench, so he again had options and had no reason to start Partey at RB. His brainless decision making probably cost us two points in that game. Let's hope it doesn't make a difference at the end of the season!
Even if your theory about punishing Gabriel is correct...and you have no way of knowing if that is fact...then Arteta was a prat for putting the team in jeopardy out of spite. To be honest, if he really was punishing Gabriel, then surely he would have left him out of the squad for the game altogether?
As for the second part in red, that is indeed the worry. The better defensive set up has been forced upon him, but now that Partey is fit, will he revert to sticking him at RB because he thinks it's a good move, or indeed, to squeeze Havertz in midfield? We all know (or most of us) that the sensible decision is to bench Havrertz, stick Partey in midfield with Rice and leave the fucking defence alone.
Well KH I agree, that's the point I was making. Nothing was forced onto Arteta, he clearly chose the tactic of Havertz in midfield and Partey at RB. Now that everyone is fit, we'll see if he's learnt his lesson about the idiotic tactic, or if he'll revert to it. Surely he can't be so fucking stupid to drop Gabriel again (or anyone else in the back four) and put Partey at RB can he?....Can he.......??