USMARTIN'S MAILBAG - SPECIAL EARLY EDITION(As In Early HERE)

MM99 · Post by **MM99** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:19 am

USMartin wrote:Secondly I challenge you to find one post where I have stated the moderators are attempting to censor me at all. I have stated consistently that is a group of forum members who want this â€“ they are the people bringing pressure on at least DB10 to act as they wish. I am not saying that about the moderators now and have never said that before and I challenge to produce one example contradicting that. The moderators including DB10 have been wonderfully fair to and considerate of me and all of us really so far as I know and are doing so even now.

Challenge accepted. Luckily for me i didn't have to sift through your unecessarily long dissertations and i came across it on the second page of this thread. You want one example of where you say the moderators attempting to censor you? Well here is a snipet of the post aimed at Db10, who is indeed a moderator, that shows you suggesting that he has double standards towards your view and others who regularly criticise wenger.

You first say:

As to the whole multiple thread concept - it strikes me that even if this not how it is intended when you put that in play it serves to censro ceratin views.

Implying that the method of moderation that the mods use here seeks to censor certain views.

You then complain that you are treated differently to others, as other posters (in your words) can moan and call Wenger a *word censored* on several different threads, yet they aren't treated in the same manner as you. In essence you are complaining that when you do it about the board you are told to keep it to one thread, but when others do it about other subjects, they are not treated like this.

After all there are plenty of multiple threads here about the future of the club and the manager and certain people post in all the same and basically post the smae things - to paraphrase that the sole problem is tha t Arsene Wenger is simply as miseerly stubborn deluded c**t and should fuck off. It seems this singluar view being re-posted over and over in any number of threads is somehow acceptible here, despite it being very offensive to many despite hi-jacking threads, and despite it not being fully proven to be true.

In my mind that is complaining about differential treatment on the moderators' behalf, and the reason for this (as you stated above) is because they seem to be "censoring certain views"

So there you go. A perfect example of you complaining to DB10 that his wish in keeping your board related discussions to one thread is censoring your view.

No doubt you'll reply back with a long winded message in the hope of me not reading it and you feeling as though you have countered my evidence and that you have won the argument, and you can go on ahead and do so if you wish. However, a rational intelligent being would clearly see that i have actually taken on your challenge and in fact found a post where you claim the moderators to be censoring your views.

Thank you very much and good night.

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:23 am

Martin,

No-one has got a problem with your mailbag threads as long as they simply cover off Board-related issues. However, most of your 'bags' have been dealing with other topics, which are already covered in the main body of the forum. Can you not see this? Several people have pointed it out to you already. It's as if you're simple.

Ironically, your inability to take criticism and your blind folllowing of a strategy that clearly isn't working reminds me of somebody....

Wenger... the man you are trying to defend...

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:22 am

MM99 wrote:Challenge accepted. Luckily for me i didn't have to sift through your unecessarily long dissertations and i came across it on the second page of this thread. You want one example of where you say the moderators attempting to censor you? Well here is a snipet of the post aimed at Db10, who is indeed a moderator, that shows you suggesting that he has double standards towards your view and others who regularly criticise wenger.

You first say:
As to the whole multiple thread concept - it strikes me that even if this not how it is intended when you put that in play it serves to censro ceratin views.
Implying that the method of moderation that the mods use here seeks to censor certain views.

Luckier for me that it was you who took up the challange, becuase unless you do not actually understand spoken English or simply are a shamless liar when it comes to interpreting the language you must surely know that even if that is not how it is intended is stating that the applying the rules properly can have unintended consequences by those applying the rules which was exactly my point. It is completely consistent with all other statements I have made on this issue

With that cleared up responding to the rest of your point is as pointless as it needless because it has no more credibility than your inaccurate misrepresentation of my views above.

Thank you and have a wonderful morning.

mrgnu1958 · Post by **mrgnu1958** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:25 am

ive just come in from work ya know.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:50 am

mrgnu1958 wrote:ive just come in from work ya know.

Any good fares -hot girls or celeb-types I mean

Naki_Gooner · Post by **Naki_Gooner** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:50 am

stereotypical seppo "look at me, look at me, look at me"

Naki_Gooner · Post by **Naki_Gooner** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:50 am

stereotypical seppo "look at me, look at me, look at me"

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:23 am

Would that explain the double post?

LDB · Post by **LDB** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:29 am

Get a blog. Seriously, this isnt intended as a snarky comment. Get a blog and then only the weight of your arguments will matter. You clearly arent comfortable with the concise, informal format of a discussion forum.

If you do so i promise to give you clicks on newsnow.

MM99 · Post by **MM99** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:31 am

USMartin wrote:
MM99 wrote:Challenge accepted. Luckily for me i didn't have to sift through your unecessarily long dissertations and i came across it on the second page of this thread. You want one example of where you say the moderators attempting to censor you? Well here is a snipet of the post aimed at Db10, who is indeed a moderator, that shows you suggesting that he has double standards towards your view and others who regularly criticise wenger.

You first say:
As to the whole multiple thread concept - it strikes me that even if this not how it is intended when you put that in play it serves to censro ceratin views.
Implying that the method of moderation that the mods use here seeks to censor certain views.
Luckier for me that it was you who took up the challange, becuase unless you do not actually understand spoken English or simply are a shamless liar when it comes to interpreting the language you must surely know that even if that is not how it is intended is stating that the applying the rules properly can have unintended consequences by those applying the rules which was exactly my point. It is completely consistent with all other statements I have made on this issue

With that cleared up responding to the rest of your point is as pointless as it needless because it has no more credibility than your inaccurate misrepresentation of my views above.

Thank you and have a wonderful morning.

Are you mentally retarded? No, seriously, are you?

It doesn't matter if you're saying they intend it or not. You're still saying that their decisions and the views that they hold when moderating this forum leads to certain views being censored, namely yours. You said "i challenge you to find an example where i have claimed a moderator to be censoring me"; well the above shows that! You, regardless of saying whether they are doing it intentionally or intending it to happen, are clearly saying that DB10s actions have led to certain views being censored. That is you blatently complaining that, even if it is not what the mods intend, your views have been censored.

I find it unbelievable that you actually don't have a clue what you're writing half the time and that other people have to explain it to you. I would suggest you refrain from making such long posts so frequently as evidently you are losing yourself in the swarm of words and not really understanding what you are writing.

Henry Norris 1913 · Post by **Henry Norris 1913** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:43 am

who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks?

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:26 pm

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks? ...

Oi!!!! Show Mr Wenger a little more respect!!!

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:48 pm

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks?

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum

No if anything has runied this forum - and I would hardly call it runined it is the attempts of a specific few people to impose editorail control over the content of the Board even over the moderators of the forum and their pathetic cowardice about acknowledging this.

The simple truth is you don't want certain comments on here but simply lack the courage to just say it. And for what to feel a bit less lousy. To preserve a lifetime of how unique and special things were at Arsenal. A number of you are almost like racists who won't or can't cease to be racists but keep insisting they aren't because they can't admit to being what they are because deep down they know that behavior is wrong and no longer truly acceptiable.

I am tired of you trying to make your reaction to views you do not like and do not want posted here my fault because you can't take any sort of resposibility when you can't and won't behave like mature adults. If the forum is ruined it is because of people like you. You choose to read the posts - if you even do that much - and you certainly choose to react to them as you do. Or are so unstable that you cannot control your own actions or reactions then?

JMascis666 · Post by **JMascis666** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:50 pm

USMartin wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks?

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum
No if anything has runied this forum - and I would hardly call it runined it is the attempts of a specific few people to impose editorail control over the content of the Board even over the moderators of the forum and their pathetic cowardice about acknowledging this.

The simple truth is you don't want certain comments on here but simply lack the courage to just say it. And for what to feel a bit less lousy. To preserve a lifetime of how unique and special things were at Arsenal. A number of you are almost like racists who won't or can't cease to be racists but keep insisting they aren't because they can't admit to being what they are because deep down they know that behavior is wrong and no longer truly acceptiable.

I am tired of you trying to make your reaction to views you do not like and do not want posted here my fault because you can't take any sort of resposibility when you can't and won't behave like mature adults. If the forum is ruined it is because of people like you. You choose to read the posts - if you even do that much - and you certainly choose to react to them as you do. Or are so unstable that you cannot control your own actions or reactions then?

Don't you think that the fact your the only person who thinks this might actualy mean you are wrong?

If the policies of this forum offend and annoy you so much why don't you f*ck off and spare us your increasingly strange and paranoid ramblings.

Post by **DB10GOONER** » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:52 pm

USMartin wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks?

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum
No if anything has runied this forum - and I would hardly call it runined it is the attempts of a specific few people to impose editorail control over the content of the Board even over the moderators of the forum and their pathetic cowardice about acknowledging this.

The simple truth is you don't want certain comments on here but simply lack the courage to just say it. And for what to feel a bit less lousy. To preserve a lifetime of how unique and special things were at Arsenal. A number of you are almost like racists who won't or can't cease to be racists but keep insisting they aren't because they can't admit to being what they are because deep down they know that behavior is wrong and no longer truly acceptiable.

I am tired of you trying to make your reaction to views you do not like and do not want posted here my fault because you can't take any sort of resposibility when you can't and won't behave like mature adults. If the forum is ruined it is because of people like you. You choose to read the posts - if you even do that much - and you certainly choose to react to them as you do. Or are so unstable that you cannot control your own actions or reactions then?

Martin the "racist" comparison is below you mate. And quite offensive to anyone that has suffered at the hands of racists. Not a good post.