USMARTIN'S MAILBAG - SPECIAL EARLY EDITION(As In Early HERE)

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

DB10GOONER wrote:
USMartin wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks? :lol:

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum
No if anything has runied this forum - and I would hardly call it runined it is the attempts of a specific few people to impose editorail control over the content of the Board even over the moderators of the forum and their pathetic cowardice about acknowledging this.

The simple truth is you don't want certain comments on here but simply lack the courage to just say it. And for what to feel a bit less lousy. To preserve a lifetime of how unique and special things were at Arsenal. A number of you are almost like racists who won't or can't cease to be racists but keep insisting they aren't because they can't admit to being what they are because deep down they know that behavior is wrong and no longer truly acceptiable.

I am tired of you trying to make your reaction to views you do not like and do not want posted here my fault because you can't take any sort of resposibility when you can't and won't behave like mature adults. If the forum is ruined it is because of people like you. You choose to read the posts - if you even do that much - and you certainly choose to react to them as you do. Or are so unstable that you cannot control your own actions or reactions then?
Martin the "racist" comparison is below you mate. And quite offensive to anyone that has suffered at the hands of racists. Not a good post. :(
My sincerest apologies then. Though let's be clear I was not comparing anyone to racists in terms of their treatment of me. I was comparing their desire to impose their conrol over the editorail content of all things discussed here but their unwillingness to acknowledge they were doing that because they no deep down it is wrong and not how they would want to be treated themselves. But not wrong enough for them to be able ro willing behave properly and reasonably. It was like racists in the South here attacked camera men filming them beating up Blacks. They would rather try to convince people it wasn't happening or it wasn't their fault than simply change their behavior..

That is all I meant by that though I do understand your point there DB10 and I apolgize if my analogy offended or touched an old nerve with anyone. But I still think that my descirption of the behavior there and above in this post. of these individuals is spot-on. And I am tired of them trying to blame for how they choose to act or react on here, and I believe it is their actions and reactions - which are solely their responsibility - that have made this forum toxic.

Just as I am solely resposible for making the point you criticized me for quite rightly. No one made me do it because no one makes me do anything. I chose to do it because while I was insensitive in the manner you suggest I think my comparison of the behavior was absolutely correct and justified. Still in the end I was wrong, and thank you for pointing that out and reminding me of myself.

There's a lesson in that somewhere, not that thoise who need it would get it I fear.

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

USMartin wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:who the fuck cares what this self righteous , arrogant know it all thinks? :lol:

seriously martin I hope your neice breaks your computer again so you don't come back here with the same bollocks as its ruined this forum
No if anything has runied this forum - and I would hardly call it runined it is the attempts of a specific few people to impose editorail control over the content of the Board even over the moderators of the forum and their pathetic cowardice about acknowledging this.

The simple truth is you don't want certain comments on here but simply lack the courage to just say it. And for what to feel a bit less lousy. To preserve a lifetime of how unique and special things were at Arsenal. A number of you are almost like racists who won't or can't cease to be racists but keep insisting they aren't because they can't admit to being what they are because deep down they know that behavior is wrong and no longer truly acceptiable.

I am tired of you trying to make your reaction to views you do not like and do not want posted here my fault because you can't take any sort of resposibility when you can't and won't behave like mature adults. If the forum is ruined it is because of people like you. You choose to read the posts - if you even do that much - and you certainly choose to react to them as you do. Or are so unstable that you cannot control your own actions or reactions then?
Round in bleedin' circles, mate. Round and round we go.

Will it ever stop?

Most of your posts aren't even about Arsenal anymore... just arguing your forum 'rights' :(

It's moved beyond tiresome now - to be honest, I don't care if your rights for editorial control are being hijacked by these 'online racists' ( :roll: ) but I wish you'd just get on with things and find a cause worth fighting.... and honestly, your 'right's on a bleedin' football forum are not worthy of debate, nevermind the months and the thousands upon thousands of words you've dedicated to the subject :(

Amnesty international could do with someone like you - but the online gooner? don't be daft. Chill out, post your shit, and get on with it.

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

MM99 wrote:
USMartin wrote:
MM99 wrote:Challenge accepted. Luckily for me i didn't have to sift through your unecessarily long dissertations and i came across it on the second page of this thread. You want one example of where you say the moderators attempting to censor you? Well here is a snipet of the post aimed at Db10, who is indeed a moderator, that shows you suggesting that he has double standards towards your view and others who regularly criticise wenger.

You first say:
As to the whole multiple thread concept - it strikes me that even if this not how it is intended when you put that in play it serves to censro ceratin views.
Implying that the method of moderation that the mods use here seeks to censor certain views.
Luckier for me that it was you who took up the challange, becuase unless you do not actually understand spoken English or simply are a shamless liar when it comes to interpreting the language you must surely know that even if that is not how it is intended is stating that the applying the rules properly can have unintended consequences by those applying the rules which was exactly my point. It is completely consistent with all other statements I have made on this issue

With that cleared up responding to the rest of your point is as pointless as it needless because it has no more credibility than your inaccurate misrepresentation of my views above.

Thank you and have a wonderful morning.
Are you mentally retarded? No, seriously, are you?

It doesn't matter if you're saying they intend it or not. You're still saying that their decisions and the views that they hold when moderating this forum leads to certain views being censored, namely yours. You said "i challenge you to find an example where i have claimed a moderator to be censoring me"; well the above shows that! You, regardless of saying whether they are doing it intentionally or intending it to happen, are clearly saying that DB10s actions have led to certain views being censored. That is you blatently complaining that, even if it is not what the mods intend, your views have been censored.

I find it unbelievable that you actually don't have a clue what you're writing half the time and that other people have to explain it to you. I would suggest you refrain from making such long posts so frequently as evidently you are losing yourself in the swarm of words and not really understanding what you are writing.
No you see there is a difference between pointing out the consequences of an individual's actions and discerning their intent. If say you your best mate tries to step in between you and a bloke who you're about to punch if you happen to hit your mate and knock his teeth out was that the intent of your action?

I do believe the consequence of the action DB10 discussed would be a form of censorship but I don't believe for one moment that would he his intent based on my interaction with him over the last several months even where we have disagreed at times.. People can disagree - strongly even - without becoming toxic or rabid in their behavior if they choose to.

Something for some here to ponder perhaps...

stg
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Post by stg »

52 :lol:

User avatar
olgitgooner
Posts: 7431
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:39 am
Location: Brexitland

Post by olgitgooner »

Martin, here is a list of the insulting allegations which you have made against fellow forum members, on this one single thread:

deluded
avoiding reality
apologists for the board
bizarre reasoning
trying to impose editorial control
claiming to be a victim
obsessive compulsive psychological problem
shameful actions
shameless deviousness
naked attempt to censor
inaccuracy and falsehood
shameless liar
inaccurate misrepresentation
pathetic cowardice
lack of courage
almost like racists
unstable

these are your words.

Think about it.

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

g88ner wrote: Most of your posts aren't even about Arsenal anymore... just arguing your forum 'rights' :
I agree largely though not entirely - after all the post that began this thread was about Arsenal. But that was neither my choice nor my intent. That is the choice and intent of a few individuals not satisfied with hounding opinions they do not like off certain htreads. They want to force them off any and all threads. And As I say they lack the courage of their convictions - which was the point about racism - and the maturity to accept responsibility for their own actions and reactions (and they aren't all a bunch of teenagers or whatever it was you suggested) behaving like this.
g88ner wrote: It's moved beyond tiresome now - to be honest, I don't care if your rights for editorial control are being hijacked


Fair enough but I'll bet you would if they were your rights being impeded. But since they aren't there's no way to prove you wouldn't feel that way is there?
g88ner wrote: but I wish you'd just get on with things
i thought I had that was certainly my intent after none of oe=ther threads everyone was complaining I was hijacking and ruining have been since my return. Supposedly that was all anyone wanted. I knew better and I told you as much, But as you say you could care less about those facts so it would hardly surprise if you didn't remember me doing so

g88ner wrote:Amnesty international could do with someone like you - but the online gooner? don't be daft. Chill out, post your shit, and get on with it.
You're too kind- about the Amnesty International thing :wink:

I think if you gave the same advice about chilling out and getting on with things to some others here maybe things might change for the better, no?

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

Oh, well :lol: :lol: Merry Christmas, Martin 8) :lol:

Slightly off topic, but...

We've just been watching my housemate clear the mountain of snow off his car only to realise that he'd cleaned the wrong car! - idiot! :lol:

User avatar
Pilly
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:15 pm
Location: On a hillside desolate...

Post by Pilly »

Martin, do you get much sex?...

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62062
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

PHP wrote:Martin, do you get much sex?...
Bit uneccesary? :?

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62062
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Post by DB10GOONER »

g88ner wrote:Oh, well :lol: :lol: Merry Christmas, Martin 8) :lol:

Slightly off topic, but...

We've just been watching my housemate clear the mountain of snow off his car only to realise that he'd cleaned the wrong car! - idiot! :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

My mom once walked out of a shop at night and hopped into what she thought was my dad's car, squeezed the guy's leg and told him to drive on. It was of course the wrong car and the guy just said (jokingly) "Where to, luv?". She nearly died with embarrassment. My old man nearly died laughing at her as he sat in the car behind the one she had just hopped into! :lol: 8)

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

DB10 I'm sorry but I have to ask is some of the behavior on display in here now what you meant by pragmatism by forum members the other day? Or is the pragmatism calling the manager a senile deluded *word censored* who should fuck off?

Or is it accepting theories that are fursther proven than mine as fact here as so many do? Is that pragmatism? I mean no disrespect but I think it's a valid question. I understand your point about pragmatism and it has some validity for the reasons you suggest perhaps, but is that really the behavior we are seeing here
Last edited by USMartin on Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pilly
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:15 pm
Location: On a hillside desolate...

Post by Pilly »

DB10GOONER wrote:
PHP wrote:Martin, do you get much sex?...
Bit uneccesary? :?
Martin having sex is unnecessary?! I think he'll be the judge of that...

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

PHP wrote:Martin, do you get much sex?...
Not enough for my liking just now but then I would suppose no matter how much we are getting at any particular time we could all say that :lol: :twisted: :lol:

Oh...and it is necessary :lol:
Last edited by USMartin on Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

DB10GOONER wrote:
g88ner wrote:Oh, well :lol: :lol: Merry Christmas, Martin 8) :lol:

Slightly off topic, but...

We've just been watching my housemate clear the mountain of snow off his car only to realise that he'd cleaned the wrong car! - idiot! :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

My mom once walked out of a shop at night and hopped into what she thought was my dad's car, squeezed the guy's leg and told him to drive on. It was of course the wrong car and the guy just said (jokingly) "Where to, luv?". She nearly died with embarrassment. My old man nearly died laughing at her as he sat in the car behind the one she had just hopped into! :lol: 8)
II actually had that happen recently. I was helping my mom (as we Yanks call her) get her christmas tree and while she was getting new wreaths I put the tree in the trunk and hopped in the car and waited. and watched as she got in the car parked right in front of her car ( I have epilepsy so I ddo not drive though I can)so she couldn't even recognize her own car or son apparently (or maybe she just doesn't like long posts questioning the Board either :lol: )

And she doesn't even realize the guy next to her is not in fact me and only when she couldn't fit the key in the iignition did she realize what she done. Thankfully she knew better than to squeeze his leg because I'd never be able to ride with her again otherwise!

stg
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Post by stg »

52 :lol: :lol:

Post Reply