Roly - I'll ask you again. Why haven't you directed any questions or any anger against Stan Kroenke??? I can't help thinking that you're barking up the wrong tree by aiming your fire at Gazidis.
Kroenke's the man that owns the Club; he's the man that has been on the Board since April 2007; he's the man that has said not 1 single, solitary word to Arsenal fans in 4 and a half years; and he is Gazidis' boss.
I cannot believe that Silent Stan is getting off so lightly - if Wenger is (quite rightly) getting a load of stick, surely we need to be directing some serious questions towards Kroenke??
GAZIDIS - A DISGRACE & MORE CULPABLE THAN WENGER
-
JMascis666
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:46 am
- Location: N16
Will you give over with all the Gooner Ed crap your just going around and around in circles and boring everyone shitless in the process.rolypoly wrote:the comments made demonstrate that most of us are in the dark as to where responsibility for transfers truly lies and in particular who was responsible for last minute panic buying.
mates ask what i think about the transfers. i liken it to shopping on xmas eve . you have done your duty you dont have to feel too guilty you might have got something ok but in your heart of hearts you know with more planning you could and should have done better.
does anyone know what gazidis did to earn his £800,000 bonus. from comments made on here it seems he has bugger all responsibility for anything . no wonder he is so smug.
incidentally can anyone explain why gooner ed will not rise to the challenge and tender his honest appraisal of gazidis- i suspect he knows gazidis far better than any of us and in a better position to comment on his role
i hope its not true ken friar is still involved. he is a dinosaur way past his sell by date. if he is still involved that would go someway to explaining why the club is such a shambles but my main target is still gazidis-get rid of him please.
one final thought - arguably some comments made in my opening post could be regarded as defamatory if inaccurate and therefore pulled. maybe i am close to the truth - or maybe gazidis so well protected( inc by gooner" dont complain to gazidis" ed )does not care.
jumpers
thought i posted reply yesteday so will keep brief
you make valid point
my response-kroenke-i had no expectations
gazidis - introduced as dein`s capable successor. i had expectations and in my eyes has failed miserably
masciss
if not interested in my pearls of wisdom dont read them.
if editorial integrity is not of importance to you then thats your choice
if gooner ed answered the challenge then i would shut up so blame gooner ed not me. its his choice to duck and dive the issue
thought i posted reply yesteday so will keep brief
you make valid point
my response-kroenke-i had no expectations
gazidis - introduced as dein`s capable successor. i had expectations and in my eyes has failed miserably
masciss
if not interested in my pearls of wisdom dont read them.
if editorial integrity is not of importance to you then thats your choice
if gooner ed answered the challenge then i would shut up so blame gooner ed not me. its his choice to duck and dive the issue
-
JMascis666
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:46 am
- Location: N16
Your right I shouldn't bother reading your posts, they are essentially the same post over and over again after all.rolypoly wrote:jumpers
thought i posted reply yesteday so will keep brief
you make valid point
my response-kroenke-i had no expectations
gazidis - introduced as dein`s capable successor. i had expectations and in my eyes has failed miserably
masciss
if not interested in my pearls of wisdom dont read them.
if editorial integrity is not of importance to you then thats your choice
if gooner ed answered the challenge then i would shut up so blame gooner ed not me. its his choice to duck and dive the issue
