
and Mark Hughes



yes, that´s my worry: a nasty surprise in 2009-2010 and we´re fighting for 7th place and the ugly Euro LeagueRob wrote: But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
What like the 'We definately cant get fourth' brigade were this season? they were all slightly embarrassed werent they!Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
Chelsea were already in the top 4 when Abramovich took over, or at least were a lot closer than Man City were. They also had a strong squad already.Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
So what you're saying is that we are probably looking at finishing 7th or 8th next yearhadareud wrote:Chelsea were already in the top 4 when Abramovich took over, or at least were a lot closer than Man City were. They also had a strong squad already.Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
I'm not underestimating Man City, they have invested a lot of money already (over 180 million pounds in the last two years), but I think it will take them longer than it took Chelsea.
The big 4 as they were in the past won't exist anymore soon enough. It will be a fight between at least 5 if not 6 or 7, Man city aren't the only team with a lot of newly acquired cash.
How have you taken that from that post? I took it as Man City arent the only side with some money...Im fairly sure we will be equipped enough to finish at least 4th next seasonSPUDMASHER wrote:So what you're saying is that we are probably looking at finishing 7th or 8th next yearhadareud wrote:Chelsea were already in the top 4 when Abramovich took over, or at least were a lot closer than Man City were. They also had a strong squad already.Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
I'm not underestimating Man City, they have invested a lot of money already (over 180 million pounds in the last two years), but I think it will take them longer than it took Chelsea.
The big 4 as they were in the past won't exist anymore soon enough. It will be a fight between at least 5 if not 6 or 7, Man city aren't the only team with a lot of newly acquired cash.![]()
![]()
That's a bit negative isn't it. Surely with our squad we should be looking to have it won by March at the latest.
Read the whole thing in context Swale. And get a sense of humour while you are at it.Swale_Gooner1985 wrote:How have you taken that from that post? I took it as Man City arent the only side with some money...Im fairly sure we will be equipped enough to finish at least 4th next seasonSPUDMASHER wrote:So what you're saying is that we are probably looking at finishing 7th or 8th next yearhadareud wrote:Chelsea were already in the top 4 when Abramovich took over, or at least were a lot closer than Man City were. They also had a strong squad already.Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.
I'm not underestimating Man City, they have invested a lot of money already (over 180 million pounds in the last two years), but I think it will take them longer than it took Chelsea.
The big 4 as they were in the past won't exist anymore soon enough. It will be a fight between at least 5 if not 6 or 7, Man city aren't the only team with a lot of newly acquired cash.![]()
![]()
That's a bit negative isn't it. Surely with our squad we should be looking to have it won by March at the latest.
I know I like to be optimistic as well but.....can I have your dealers number!?SPUDMASHER wrote:cusamano wrote:yeah, not only in the Premier League but also in Europe!hadareud wrote:
we'll be in the top 2 next season, minimum.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh dear god, I've just the type of accident I haven't had since I was three years old
Agree.Rob wrote:This is what people said about Chelsea when the Russian took over.
But if you throw unlimited amounts of money at the problem, there's a chance you will get it right eventually.
And five into four doesn't go.
If City get Tevez and a couple of others - and we do nowt !![]()
- then the 'we are guarenteed 4th always brigade' , are in for a nasty surprise.