Scum fans changing their tune

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Scum fans changing their tune

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... ewcomments

looks like they're actually interested in moving away to stratford :shock:

If this happens can you imagine singing "north london is ours" in the away end at the olympic stadium? :shock: :barscarf: 8)

LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Post by LDB »

I could have told levy for free that the idea of redeveloping WHL was never going to work financially or logistically or as harry would say 'its not a goer daniel' . Still, the computer generated images were enough for spurs fans to brag about their stadium being better then the grove :lol:

User avatar
Rugby Gooner
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Rugby

Post by Rugby Gooner »

Stratford Hotspur-It's got a nice ring to it! :barscarf:

stg
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Post by stg »

A couple of years ago I was at a wedding and I was sitting opposite a spurs fan who was telling me how great the new stadium was going to be and how they were going to re-develop whl and that he had been to all the planing meetings and how Haringey council were falling over themselves to keep spurs in tottenham.

I told him that they would not build it because of the money and the inferstructure problems(transport etc) they would have. I suggested that it would be better for them if they moved. I was told in no uncertain terms that they would never leave tottenham.

I wish I could meet him again to ask what he thinks now

User avatar
O'Leary
Posts: 450
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:57 am
Location: Newmarket

Post by O'Leary »

We moved in, we took over,


...they fucked off.

User avatar
TheCook
Posts: 879
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:02 pm
Location: Cook County

Post by TheCook »

I am still convinced that the whole Stratford thing is leverage for Haringey to bend over backwards to keep them in the borough by approving the WHL plans.

A part of me would miss them if they left :oops:

Spurs fans have been singing about it, but as far as I can work out it is the same song of 'Fuck off to Stratford, North London is ours' ??

User avatar
Bradywasking
Posts: 6259
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am

Post by Bradywasking »

Theme Music from Eastenders would be a nice wind-up at the Lane

User avatar
O'Leary
Posts: 450
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:57 am
Location: Newmarket

Post by O'Leary »

Bradywasking wrote:Theme Music from Eastenders would be a nice wind-up at the Lane
Yeah, classic. "get outta my borough, go on, get out of it" in a Peggy Mitchell style.

Still, I suppose Harry could get a job shifting cars on Max's car lot.
Last edited by O'Leary on Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Post by LDB »

TheCook wrote:I am still convinced that the whole Stratford thing is leverage for Haringey to bend over backwards to keep them in the borough by approving the WHL plans.

A part of me would miss them if they left :oops:

Spurs fans have been singing about it, but as far as I can work out it is the same song of 'Fuck off to Stratford, North London is ours' ??
Instead of fuck off they do "say no to Stratford" which is weak imo.

Its Up 4 Grabs Now
Posts: 4701
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by Its Up 4 Grabs Now »

TheCook wrote:I am still convinced that the whole Stratford thing is leverage for Haringey to bend over backwards to keep them in the borough by approving the WHL plans.

A part of me would miss them if they left :oops:
I know what you mean. As much fun as it would be to laugh at them after all their “Woolwich nomadsâ€

stg
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Post by stg »

Where would the money for the stadium plans come from?

TOTTENHAM

From the sale of White Hart Lane, a potential share issue and £35m from the Government - plus up to £150m over 10 years from naming rights.

How much would the plans cost?

TOTTENHAM

In the region of £250million, with around £25m going to an athletics legacy by improving the Crystal Palace Stadium.

What will the they do if they don’t move to the Olympic Stadium?

TOTTENHAM

They may go back to their original plan of redeveloping White Hart Lane, although the £450m cost and poor transport links persist.

Tottenham will save £200 million by moving to the Olympic site and leasing the stadium. Tottenham, Enic and Levy would also cash in on land sales around WHL also ENIC, the investment company ultimately owned by Joe Lewis, who lives in the Bahamas, and chaired by Tottenham chief Daniel Levy, could pocket £200m by taking on the Olympic Stadium then selling Spurs to foreign owners.

Looking at it from a money point of view it all points to Spurs moving, looking at it from a point of view of which would be best for us as Arsenal fans then staying at WHL is probably best an extra £200million to spend and all the hastle of knocking down and rebuilding plus the problems with transport and Haringey council which could drag the development out longer.

It cost Arsenal £390 million to move and build at Ashburton Grove Stratford hotspurs could get the same for £250 million!!!!
Last edited by stg on Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

stg wrote:Where would the money for the stadium plans come from?

TOTTENHAM

From the sale of White Hart Lane, a potential share issue and £35m from the Government - plus up to £150m over 10 years from naming rights.

How much would the plans cost?

TOTTENHAM

In the region of £250million, with around £25m going to an athletics legacy by improving the Crystal Palace Stadium.

What will the they do if they don’t move to the Olympic Stadium?

TOTTENHAM

They may go back to their original plan of redeveloping White Hart Lane, although the £450m cost and poor transport links persist.

Tottenham will save £200 million by moving to the Olympic site and leasing the stadium. Tottenham, Enic and Levy would also cash in on land sales around WHL also ENIC, the investment company ultimately owned by Joe Lewis, who lives in the Bahamas, and chaired by Tottenham chief Daniel Levy, could pocket £200m by taking on the Olympic Stadium then selling Spurs to foreign owners.

Looking at it from a money point of view it all points to Spurs moving, looking at it from a point of view of which would be best for us as Arsenal fans then staying at WHL is probably best an extra £200million to spend and all the hastle of knocking down and rebuilding plus the problems with transport and Haringey council which could drag the development out longer.

It cost Arsenal £390 million to move and build at Ashburton Grove Tottenham could get the same for £200 million!!!!
They could....but they'll no longer be Tottenham. 8)

stg
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Post by stg »

Edited-sorry for any confusion :lol: :lol: :barscarf:

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

stg wrote:Edited-sorry for any confusion :lol: :lol: :barscarf:
Ta! :wink: :lol:

Anyone noticed the recent chants at the Grove?

"What d'ya think of Stratford?"
SHIT!

"and what d'ya think of shit?"
STRATFORD!


:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

Clearly didn't submit that twice! :roll:

Post Reply