As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Rugby Gooner wrote:Imogen apparently said yesterday that she is going to name her player!
Yea saw she didn't care about going to jail, just wanted the truth out, just like every single one of us except the player who took out the injunction!
Why does this Imogen bird want to shop the chap she had an affair with?? - what's the point?
Surely there's no moral reason to want to tell the world... which surely means her only motivation is financial, by selling the story? or am I missing something?
The reason she so desperate to tell the world who the footballer is, so she can get her hands on the £150k the sun/news of the world has promised her..
until the story goes public, she wont get a penny.
Well if she needs money that bad then i'm prepared to let her shag my brains out and then try and sell the story to the Ash Echo. It would be hard on the family like but I promise I won't apply for a super injunction......
Well people do have a right to privacy, but IMO when you're a professional athlete getting paid in outrageous sums weekly you are willingly foregoing some of that right. Obviously a professional -anything- is held to a higher standard, these players shouldn't bitch and whine about it.
The girl is no more than a whore...as are all the other talentless bimbos who sell their kiss and tell stories to the media..What makes me laugh is she is actually trying to make out there is some sort of moral reason for naming the guy, when in reality it's just about money and attention...As much as i'd like to see the plum involved exposed for his stupidity..i'd also like to see whores like her's attempts to enrich themselves or gain notoriety off the back of others stopped...
Bergkamp-Genius wrote:The girl is no more than a whore...as are all the other talentless bimbos who sell their kiss and tell stories to the media..What makes me laugh is she is actually trying to make out there is some sort of moral reason for naming the guy, when in reality it's just about money and attention...As much as i'd like to see the plum involved exposed for his stupidity..i'd also like to see whores like her's attempts to enrich themselves or gain notoriety off the back of others stopped...
g88ner wrote:I haven't been following the story...
Why does this Imogen bird want to shop the chap she had an affair with?? - what's the point?
Surely there's no moral reason to want to tell the world... which surely means her only motivation is financial, by selling the story? or am I missing something?
Barriecuda wrote:Well people do have a right to privacy, but IMO when you're a professional athlete getting paid in outrageous sums weekly you are willingly foregoing some of that right. Obviously a professional -anything- is held to a higher standard, these players shouldn't bitch and whine about it.
As the old internet saying goes:
u mad?
Why is that exactly ? If you had an affair in your town or village could you stop the community gossiping about it ? Would you be able to take out a super injunction to stop the slapper involved naming you ? Even if you could apply for an injunction would any court grant you said injunction ? Giggs is doing what so many footballers before him have done and what so many more will do in the future and that is living off his name and celeb status. They are exploiting the fact that they are famous and can nail chicks all over the place and while each and every one of us would love to have the chance to do so as well, I dont think he should be able to use that very fame that is getting him his action to then prevent the world knowing about it
Btw that is not me defending the money grabbing whores who exploit their chance to make money in kiss and tell stories but with regards to these star footballers my feelings are "dont do the crime if you cant do the time"
They're all cuntbags. The self obsessed footballers for living off their "celebrity" status and splashing their wealth on whores like this one, often hurting their own wives and kids in the process. But also the dirty skanky little whores that will suck any famous cock if they think they will get a few free nights out or a car or holiday out of the dimwitted celebrity and can then sell their story to the scum that is the tabloid media.
If this cuntsore wants to do the "moral" thing then take no money for the story. Yeah, right...
Barriecuda wrote:Well people do have a right to privacy, but IMO when you're a professional athlete getting paid in outrageous sums weekly you are willingly foregoing some of that right. Obviously a professional -anything- is held to a higher standard, these players shouldn't bitch and whine about it.
As the old internet saying goes:
u mad?
Why is that exactly ? If you had an affair in your town or village could you stop the community gossiping about it ? Would you be able to take out a super injunction to stop the slapper involved naming you ? Even if you could apply for an injunction would any court grant you said injunction ? Giggs is doing what so many footballers before him have done and what so many more will do in the future and that is living off his name and celeb status. They are exploiting the fact that they are famous and can nail chicks all over the place and while each and every one of us would love to have the chance to do so as well, I dont think he should be able to use that very fame that is getting him his action to then prevent the world knowing about it
Btw that is not me defending the money grabbing whores who exploit their chance to make money in kiss and tell stories but with regards to these star footballers my feelings are "dont do the crime if you cant do the time"
Because we have a charter of human rights that should be adhered to. Once you start disregarding one right you're putting all other rights at risk. No matter what your views on high paid celebrities are, they have just as much of a claim to these rights as you or me.
Barriecuda wrote:Well people do have a right to privacy, but IMO when you're a professional athlete getting paid in outrageous sums weekly you are willingly foregoing some of that right. Obviously a professional -anything- is held to a higher standard, these players shouldn't bitch and whine about it.
As the old internet saying goes:
u mad?
Why is that exactly ? If you had an affair in your town or village could you stop the community gossiping about it ? Would you be able to take out a super injunction to stop the slapper involved naming you ? Even if you could apply for an injunction would any court grant you said injunction ? Giggs is doing what so many footballers before him have done and what so many more will do in the future and that is living off his name and celeb status. They are exploiting the fact that they are famous and can nail chicks all over the place and while each and every one of us would love to have the chance to do so as well, I dont think he should be able to use that very fame that is getting him his action to then prevent the world knowing about it
Btw that is not me defending the money grabbing whores who exploit their chance to make money in kiss and tell stories but with regards to these star footballers my feelings are "dont do the crime if you cant do the time"
Because we have a charter of human rights that should be adhered to. Once you start disregarding one right you're putting all other rights at risk. No matter what your views on high paid celebrities are, they have just as much of a claim to these rights as you or me.