Would it work with Chamakh?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
jrthgooner
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:24 am

Would it work with Chamakh?

Post by jrthgooner »

Michael Clarke (Australian cricket captain) was dropped by his bat sponsor 3 days before the test with India and went on to score 329 not out.

It got me thinking if the crazy people who sponsor Chamakh were to drop him would it help him locate the back of the net again??

I have my doubts as to whether he could score in a brothel even so but surely it is worth a go!!!
Top
User avatar
STLgooner89
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:50 am
Location: st. louis

Post by STLgooner89 »

What the fuck would it even matter if he wasn't sponsored anymore? Wenger has him on 60k a week anyway.
Top
User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22620
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Post by rodders999 »

Worst.Thread.Ever.
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Post by SteveO 35 »

rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
I'm quite pleased to here that Rodders. It seems like my 'Ode to Abou' that I did a while back is growing in popularity - absence makes the heart grow fonder clearly :barscarf: :barscarf:
Top
Macca
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:36 am
Location: London

Post by Macca »

I think he should start wearing his Shnoood again , he seemed ok when he that on ??
:?:
Top
User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22620
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Post by rodders999 »

SteveO 35 wrote:
rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
I'm quite pleased to here that Rodders. It seems like my 'Ode to Abou' that I did a while back is growing in popularity - absence makes the heart grow fonder clearly :barscarf: :barscarf:

What you on??!! I love a good Diaby thread, it gives me an opening to call him a bean headed, sick note, HOPELESS fucking *word censored*, something I never tire of.

Keep em coming SteveO......



:wink:
Top
User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
Sorry jrthgooner Rodders is right and if anyone knows about shit threads and posts its Rodders 8) :wink:
Top
User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Post by I Hate Hleb »

rodders999 wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
I'm quite pleased to here that Rodders. It seems like my 'Ode to Abou' that I did a while back is growing in popularity - absence makes the heart grow fonder clearly :barscarf: :barscarf:

What you on??!! I love a good Diaby thread, it gives me an opening to call him a bean headed, sick note, HOPELESS fucking c**t, something I never tire of.

Keep em coming SteveO......



:wink:
:shock: :shock: :shock:

I take it you're not as big a fan of The Imperious One as what SteveO and I (and no doubt millions of others) are then rodders? :? :? :lol: :lol: :wink:
Top
User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Post by Gunnersaurus »

STLgooner89 wrote:What the fuck would it even matter if he wasn't sponsored anymore? Wenger has him on 60k a week anyway.
As much as I now detest Chamuck comments like this are so far off the mark, he came on a free, for no fee, hes gonna get good wages, he would be a mug otherwise and you don't really understand the game if you think otherwise.
Top
User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 9931
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Post by TeeCee »

I think he should start wearing his Shnoood again , he seemed ok when he that on ??
I agree, but he should pull it right up over his greasy fucking head to improve his game!! :barscarf:
Top
Nick Bendtners Ego
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:59 pm
Location: Dark Recesses of Wengers Mind

Post by Nick Bendtners Ego »

A Lobotomy would not work for Chamakh. In front of goal he'd still look like A kerb crawling David pleat caught in police headlights whilst would still be stupid enough to be caught as the meat in a saucy Las Vegas fleshy sandwich again (allegedly)

File under ' Arsenal's shittest ever strikers' please
Top
User avatar
STLgooner89
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:50 am
Location: st. louis

Post by STLgooner89 »

Gunnersaurus wrote:
STLgooner89 wrote:What the fuck would it even matter if he wasn't sponsored anymore? Wenger has him on 60k a week anyway.
As much as I now detest Chamuck comments like this are so far off the mark, he came on a free, for no fee, hes gonna get good wages, he would be a mug otherwise and you don't really understand the game if you think otherwise.
What? That run on sentence you produced was pretty hard to comprehend so I'm really having a hard time trying to understand what point you were trying to defend. It was pretty obvious what I was stating; that losing a boot sponsor, or something of that matter, shouldn't affect someone that greatly.
Top
User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22620
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Post by rodders999 »

flash gunner wrote:
rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
Sorry jrthgooner Rodders is right and if anyone knows about shit threads and posts its Rodders 8) :wink:
I really wanted to make a good counter argument to this but Flash is right :cry:


Oh wait :finger:


:wink:
Top
User avatar
rodders999
Posts: 22620
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Diamond Club

Post by rodders999 »

I Hate Hleb wrote:
rodders999 wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:
rodders999 wrote:Worst.Thread.Ever.
I'm quite pleased to here that Rodders. It seems like my 'Ode to Abou' that I did a while back is growing in popularity - absence makes the heart grow fonder clearly :barscarf: :barscarf:

What you on??!! I love a good Diaby thread, it gives me an opening to call him a bean headed, sick note, HOPELESS fucking c**t, something I never tire of.

Keep em coming SteveO......



:wink:
:shock: :shock: :shock:

I take it you're not as big a fan of The Imperious One as what SteveO and I (and no doubt millions of others) are then rodders? :? :? :lol: :lol: :wink:
You on the glue again Hlebby I see :roll:



:wink:
Top
User avatar
Gunnersaurus
Posts: 4151
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
Location: london

Post by Gunnersaurus »

STLgooner89 wrote:
Gunnersaurus wrote:
STLgooner89 wrote:What the fuck would it even matter if he wasn't sponsored anymore? Wenger has him on 60k a week anyway.
As much as I now detest Chamuck comments like this are so far off the mark, he came on a free, for no fee, hes gonna get good wages, he would be a mug otherwise and you don't really understand the game if you think otherwise.
What? That run on sentence you produced was pretty hard to comprehend so I'm really having a hard time trying to understand what point you were trying to defend. It was pretty obvious what I was stating; that losing a boot sponsor, or something of that matter, shouldn't affect someone that greatly.
What don't you understand?

You moan at Chamakh for getting 60k a week, whether he is worth it or not is irrelevant, he came for no fee, he's gonna get bigger wages, that's how the system works.

Why else do you think players run their contracts down for?

He hasn't been given 60k because he's amazing, he's got it as there was no fee.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “On the Terraces”