Ashley, Samir, Gael & (Cahill & Mata) have the last laugh
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: London
Mata and Cahill
the 2 players who should have signed for Arsenal last summer but didnt
the 2 players who instead signed for Chelsea
the 2 players who are now Champions League winners
this self sustaining crap is slowly killing this club.
at least Chelsea have a billionaire who cares about his team, do you think Kroenke would have even bothered to turn up if we reached a CL final? Money rules. This is a sad day for football. There can now be no more excuses if we dont spend big this summer. Either that or the board comes out and admits Arsenal are no longer trying to win trophies.
the 2 players who instead signed for Chelsea
the 2 players who are now Champions League winners
this self sustaining crap is slowly killing this club.
at least Chelsea have a billionaire who cares about his team, do you think Kroenke would have even bothered to turn up if we reached a CL final? Money rules. This is a sad day for football. There can now be no more excuses if we dont spend big this summer. Either that or the board comes out and admits Arsenal are no longer trying to win trophies.
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
Re: Mata and Cahill
Red Member wrote:the 2 players who should have signed for Arsenal last summer but didnt
the 2 players who instead signed for Chelsea
the 2 players who are now Champions League winners
this self sustaining crap is slowly killing this club.
at least Chelsea have a billionaire who cares about his team, do you think Kroenke would have even bothered to turn up if we reached a CL final? Money rules. This is a sad day for football. There can now be no more excuses if we dont spend big this summer. Either that or the board comes out and admits Arsenal are no longer trying to win trophies.
sooner you realise, Arsenal are not a big club in Europe. Your pain will ease
Last edited by Rosie_titters on Sun May 20, 2012 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Mata and Cahill
last summer Wenger said; we don't need quality, we need SUPER QUALITY, so instead of Mata and Cahill we have Gervinho and Mertesacker
Arsenal FOOTBALL club passed away in 2006, now they only care about the money.



Arsenal FOOTBALL club passed away in 2006, now they only care about the money.
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
Re: Mata and Cahill
Lukasz84 wrote:last summer Wenger said; we don't need quality, we need SUPER QUALITY, so instead of Mata and Cahill we have Gervinho and Mertesacker![]()
![]()
![]()
Arsenal FOOTBALL club passed away in 2006, now they only care about the money.
not totally true, have we ever been a club, that has thrown lots of money around, even under George, we had a team of home grown players or bargain buys.
Re: Mata and Cahill
Babatunde, you logged in with wrong usernameRed Member wrote:the 2 players who should have signed for Arsenal last summer but didnt
the 2 players who instead signed for Chelsea
the 2 players who are now Champions League winners
this self sustaining crap is slowly killing this club.
at least Chelsea have a billionaire who cares about his team, do you think Kroenke would have even bothered to turn up if we reached a CL final? Money rules. This is a sad day for football. There can now be no more excuses if we dont spend big this summer. Either that or the board comes out and admits Arsenal are no longer trying to win trophies.

- terry henry
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Rainham, Kent
Re: Mata and Cahill
Thing is in a knock out competition you need a bit of luck. Much like when Porto and Liverpool won it, you can't possibly think Chelsea are the best side in European football. Would we have had more luck if we had mata and cahill?
Re: Mata and Cahill
I like Mata. He spends his free time browsing record shops in Nothing Hill, Soho and Camden, buying rarities for his uncles in Spain.
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
Re: Mata and Cahill
Mata and Modric are two of the most over rated footballers, clearly i don't watch every Chelsea and Spurs games - but the ones i do see, they look bloody average and only have a small effect on any game.
Mata was non existant in the final and the game passed him by,
Mata was non existant in the final and the game passed him by,
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: London
Re: Mata and Cahill
Who would you rather have - Mata or Gervinho?
- frankbutcher
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:07 pm
- Location: Arsenal's Treatment Room
Re: Mata and Cahill
NOT SURE IF SERIOUS.....Rosie_titters wrote:Lukasz84 wrote:last summer Wenger said; we don't need quality, we need SUPER QUALITY, so instead of Mata and Cahill we have Gervinho and Mertesacker![]()
![]()
![]()
Arsenal FOOTBALL club passed away in 2006, now they only care about the money.
not totally true, have we ever been a club, that has thrown lots of money around, even under George, we had a team of home grown players or bargain buys.
Alex James
Cliff Bastin
Alan Ball (British transfer record at the time)
Malcom McDonald
Tony Woodcock
Charlie Nicholas
Bergkamp (British transfer record at the time)
Henry
Wiltord
Reyes
Arshavin
Walcott
....................... Wenger has bought numerous £10m plus players.
Last edited by frankbutcher on Sun May 20, 2012 12:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- terry henry
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Rainham, Kent
Re: Mata and Cahill
Mata obviouslyRed Member wrote:Who would you rather have - Mata or Gervinho?
- Yankee_Gooner_Dandee
- Posts: 2902
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:04 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
Re: Mata and Cahill
mata is no fabregas or silva, but hes miles ahead of anything we have
- Gunnersaurus
- Posts: 4151
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:06 am
- Location: london
Re: Mata and Cahill
To be fair not buying Cahill for 17m turned out to be right when you consider Koscienly stayed in the team and ended up being one of our best players.
Mata is decent but after having a good look at him this year he is defiantly no Cesc who we would have expected him to be.
Mata is decent but after having a good look at him this year he is defiantly no Cesc who we would have expected him to be.
- frankbutcher
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:07 pm
- Location: Arsenal's Treatment Room
Re: Mata and Cahill
I like your logic.Gunnersaurus wrote:To be fair not buying Cahill for 17m turned out to be right when you consider Koscienly stayed in the team and ended up being one of our best players.
Mata is decent but after having a good look at him this year he is defiantly no Cesc who we would have expected him to be.


-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: London
Re: Mata and Cahill
this AKB argument needs to stop
this season has proved how insignificant managers are in the modern game.
it is all about the owners and how big their wallet is. Wenger is merely a puppet for Kroenke who allows himself to take all the criticism, whilst Kroenke just counts all the money
this season has proved how insignificant managers are in the modern game.
it is all about the owners and how big their wallet is. Wenger is merely a puppet for Kroenke who allows himself to take all the criticism, whilst Kroenke just counts all the money