As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
The headline on Arsenal .com states we have 9 players going to the Euros. Take away the two on loan and that is down to seven. Back in 2006, we had 18 squad players going to the World Cup. The euros have 14 of FIFA ranked top 20 teams playing, yet a great club like ours is only sending 7 players. That's how far we have gone backwards. Depressing
Nos89 wrote:The headline on Arsenal .com states we have 9 players going to the Euros. Take away the two on loan and that is down to seven. Back in 2006, we had 18 squad players going to the World Cup. The euros have 14 of FIFA ranked top 20 teams playing, yet a great club like ours is only sending 7 players. That's how far we have gone backwards. Depressing
Explained by Wenger's obsession with young black and gifted ( ) African players. That and a propensity to buy utter shite.
Monkeymaw wrote:Wasn't our sole representative in USA 94 Eduardo McGoldrick?
What point are you making? In a period where our squad (and most other Premier League squads) was mostly British. In 1994 neither England or Scotland qualified .
Nos89 wrote:That's how far we have gone backwards. Depressing
I don't think that means anything really, as you could make a world class team (and squad) out of players not going to the Euro's. You could have Kompany, Messi, Hazard, Wilshere, Sagna and loads of others in your team, but none of them are going for a variety of reasons.
The biggest sign we've gone backwards is that our players aren't as good as they were a decade ago. It's as simple as that.
Monkeymaw wrote:Wasn't our sole representative in USA 94 Eduardo McGoldrick?
What point are you making? In a period where our squad (and most other Premier League squads) was mostly British. In 1994 neither England or Scotland qualified .
What point are you making?
That back then Ireland were a far superior team than anything the british nations could muster
Monkeymaw wrote:Wasn't our sole representative in USA 94 Eduardo McGoldrick?
What point are you making? In a period where our squad (and most other Premier League squads) was mostly British. In 1994 neither England or Scotland qualified .
What point are you making?
That back then Ireland were a far superior team than anything the british nations could muster
Nos89 wrote:The headline on Arsenal .com states we have 9 players going to the Euros. Take away the two on loan and that is down to seven. Back in 2006, we had 18 squad players going to the World Cup. The euros have 14 of FIFA ranked top 20 teams playing, yet a great club like ours is only sending 7 players. That's how far we have gone backwards. Depressing
Oh come on, the amount of players heading for the Euros says absolutely nothing about 'how far we have fallen'. Of course we had more national squad players going to the WC in 2006, a World Cup has got 16 more countries.
I've read somewhere that only Bayern Munich and one other club have more players going to the Euros next month. Oh and don't forget nine would actually have been twelve had Wilshere, Sagna and Fabianski not been injured.
In the 1990 world cup squad there was not one Arsenal player in it No Adams Dixon Rocky Merson or Smith.12 months after we had won the league.Now there are two players in the squad
I'd say all in all we are well represented especially considering Sagna, Wilshire and Flappy.
Exactly. We are on par with most other teams and if Sagna and Wilshere were fit we'd have 9 going. Sometimes the Arsenal/ Wenger bashing gets on here is pretty illogical