Not sure this has been posted but found it interesting some players far high and some far too low Suker for example .
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2061 ... f-all-time
Bleacher Report Top 100
-
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 am
- Location: Lacking a little bit of sharpness in the final third.
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
Yeah, it looks like they've just cribbed Wiki notes for some and randomly generated their positions in a rather arbitrary fashion.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
For all this 'England's most talented player' looking at the consistency, longevity and achievements of nearly everyone else on that list Paul Gascoigne should be nowhere near it.
-
- Posts: 9800
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
the highest ranked current player is Sagna at number 53 and we can't even be bothered to try and keep him
says it all really
says it all really
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
Bleacher Report is a pile of simpleton garbage.
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
Quite like the site a simpleton I must be.gp543 wrote:Bleacher Report is a pile of simpleton garbage.
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
Judas at 19? Not a chance.
That has nothing to do with the way he left, I just think there have been more than 18 players that have been better than him.
That has nothing to do with the way he left, I just think there have been more than 18 players that have been better than him.
- GranadaJoe
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Bleacher Report Top 100
It's just a list of players some sad tosser can remember, which is why recent players are at the top of the list.
It's why Robbie Williams is always voted best singer.
If they listed the criteria by which players are judged we could have a debate, but a number of players seem to be in the upper echelons of the list because they are 'personalities', not because of their ability or achievements (Charlie Nicholas and Brian Talbot ahead of George Armstrong????)
It's why Robbie Williams is always voted best singer.
If they listed the criteria by which players are judged we could have a debate, but a number of players seem to be in the upper echelons of the list because they are 'personalities', not because of their ability or achievements (Charlie Nicholas and Brian Talbot ahead of George Armstrong????)