The spending myth

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
Wilson
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:43 am

The spending myth

Post by Wilson »

The next person, or pundit who rolls out the fuking old and false excuse about Arsene having limited resources, needs to be told he is either being intentionally dishonest, or is ignorant to the facts.

Chelsea--------------------------£215.6m
Manchester United----------£203 m
Manchester City--------------£193.8m
Arsenal---------------------------£192m
Liverpool-------------------------£152m
Tottenham------------------------£110.5

Its not just that our wage bill is around 40% more than Spurs. But we are not far from being the biggest spenders ourselves. So why is this lie about Wenger's limited resources allowed to be repeated when it is factually inaccurate?????????????????????????????

This story also appear son the BBC and Sky Sports - so its not fake. The numbers are real.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nited.html

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: The spending myth

Post by northbank123 »

You are never going to have complete wage efficiency but looking at our rivals' squads over this time we have probably been overspending by about £30m a year for season after season on a conservative estimate.

For me Rosicky and Arteta sum things up. A bumper two year deal for the former was insane given that he has given us a few performances amongst a decade of injuries - if he actually offered something in the first year who the fuck would come along to trump us offering a second one-year deal? Just completely unnecessary.

Arteta - a consummate pro who put in a few seasons of consistent performances amongst utter turd and in the twilight of his career - has been a spent force for years and offers nothing. Again ludicrous to keep him on.

Mertesacker is going the same - will still be here in 2 or 3 years as a calamity option soaking up 80k a week.

Good luck ever offloading Giroud or Walcott from their ludicrous deals - I would have them training with the kids until they got the hump because it's not just that they aren't good enough - their attitudes and priorities stink. Then again what do you expect when you grossly overpay and overpromote players then protect them from any competition and repeatedly tell everyone how utterly wonderful they are?

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 1824
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 7:17 am
Location: N5 [In hibernation]
Contact:

Re: The spending myth

Post by Sean »

It's no secret that The Old Fraud has spunked away millions per season on wages for bang average and shite players :censored:

Robin_L
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: North Bank Block 6

Re: The spending myth

Post by Robin_L »

Mertesacker is leaving the club at the same time as Wenger, June 2017.

The Arsenal squad that starts the 2017/18 season will be hopefully unrecognisable from the current one, with BritishCore gone, Rosicky/Arteta/Flamini/Mertesacker/Cazorla all gone. Hopefully Iwobi is still here at least and the new manager likes him.

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 7878
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good

Re: The spending myth

Post by StuartL »

Wilson wrote:The next person, or pundit who rolls out the fuking old and false excuse about Arsene having limited resources, needs to be told he is either being intentionally dishonest, or is ignorant to the facts.

Chelsea--------------------------£215.6m
Manchester United----------£203 m
Manchester City--------------£193.8m
Arsenal---------------------------£192m
Liverpool-------------------------£152m
Tottenham------------------------£110.5

Its not just that our wage bill is around 40% more than Spurs. But we are not far from being the biggest spenders ourselves. So why is this lie about Wenger's limited resources allowed to be repeated when it is factually inaccurate?????????????????????????????

This story also appear son the BBC and Sky Sports - so its not fake. The numbers are real.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nited.html
Fully agree, we, and by that I mean Wenker, not only accepts mediocrity but handsomely rewards it too -

Whats good for the manager is good for the players.

I wouldn't be surprised if the players and manager get an end of season bonus for making the Champions League, so happy do they appear eacdh year the coveted 4th place is secured.

Post Reply