How long should the taylor ban be?
How long should the taylor ban be?
Being honest!I'm not to sure myself.
-
SCREAM AIM FIRE
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:53 pm
- Location: London
end of the season just for the severity of it...weather he meant it or not (i belive he did set out to hurt him maybe not as much as he did but thats not for here) he still risked a mans career with recklesness, on the street he'd have got done for ABH or somthing similar for that so should at least miss the rest of the season imo.
-
stearmaster
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: ENFIELD, N.LONDON
-
TheOne2Smooth
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Leyton by way of Hackney
sorry i've remain quite the whole thing up until now
Taylor should get a 3-5 match ban, Yes it was a bad challenge Yes a players career might be over (fingers crossed its not) but the challenge was a mistimed challenge, would we be doing polls if Flamini made this challenge lets me fair he has made some nasty ones this season.
thats my opinion I still think he's a *word censored* though
Taylor should get a 3-5 match ban, Yes it was a bad challenge Yes a players career might be over (fingers crossed its not) but the challenge was a mistimed challenge, would we be doing polls if Flamini made this challenge lets me fair he has made some nasty ones this season.
thats my opinion I still think he's a *word censored* though
-
SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
-
SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
Actually Rebel, If it was the other way around Willy would have got a much longer ban and probably deported because he's " one of those dirty johnny foreigners that plays for them Arsenal cnuts"rebel gooner wrote:rules are rules,, we know there not fair but if it was the other way round and gallas had done mcfadden etc then he would have got a 3 match ban..
life gentlemen is never fair
-
Gunnerz4life
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:12 pm
- Location: India
no one thinks the 3 match is enough,, point is rules are rules whether they are right or wrongdonaldo wrote:The punishment should fit the crime,ban him till Eduardo is playing again.Anyone how thinks 3 matches is enough are you looking for a job at the FA
when you see alialidere get his ban increased to 4 games for a tiny slap then you know the system is flawed
We all know if it had been an Arsenal player the ban would be more than 3 games.And as i have said on earlier posts how come Ben Thatcher got an 8 match ban last season?rebel gooner wrote:no one thinks the 3 match is enough,, point is rules are rules whether they are right or wrongdonaldo wrote:The punishment should fit the crime,ban him till Eduardo is playing again.Anyone how thinks 3 matches is enough are you looking for a job at the FA
when you see alialidere get his ban increased to 4 games for a tiny slap then you know the system is flawed
-
Magic Merse
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: Stanford-le-hope, home of the world famous Dougie from McFly
Well i think the ben thatcher case is a lot diffrent, there was a clear and intended action from ben to get the player. Although we may not like it Taylor has got (in footballing terms) what he deserved by the letter of the law, and untill the law changes you can really argue with it too much. Despite what people may think, i personally reckon an arsenal player would of only got a red card as well. Yes there would of been more of a media out cry but i do beleive it would be left at a red card. Although the FA can supprise everyone with their stupidity, as proven in the aliadiere case.
