nut flush gooner wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2020 7:13 am
Jock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 5:35 pm
nut flush gooner wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Jock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 1:03 pm
nut flush gooner wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 11:29 am
The only reason things are drifting off course is that you keep labelling people or articles left-wing or liberal if they want rid of Cummings. Lets just put this straight, as things stand there are people of all political persuasions including over 35 Tory MPS that want this unelected bureaucrat to go (heard that somewhere before?). There also is a consensus in the wider population that what he did broke the rules, its not even open to debate. MPs have been inundated with letters/emails from their constituents, again from all political persuasions.
The discussion about predicting pandemics is relevant, especially when the government response has been found to be poor. As far as I am concerned this came up because he was using his blog as a way of squirming out of the allegations. I don't get where you keep referring to internal memos, again did you even watch or read the transcript from the press conference? If you didn't I don't know how you can form any credible opinion.
Regardless of this, to amend his blog on the 14th of April is way too much coincidence. As I said before he knew the shit was going to hit the fan, this was part of his cover-up.
In regards to his story, and yes it is a story the one thing he cannot justify over everything else is his visual impairment driving 30 miles in the wrong direction to see if he can make it to London. If his eyesight is impaired he shouldn't get into a car period, and that's under any circumstance, not just a national lockdown.
Your last comment would be fair enough if it applied to a normal citizen, but it doesn't. It applies to the most senior civil servant in the land, who directly advises the Prime Minister on wait for it Policy matters. So if he is writing the rules, and blatantly disregarding them that is why so many people are peeved with him.
By the way, SAGE minutes are widely available across the internet to read about the scientific advice that was given to the government in the run-up to lockdown. That's how it's quite well known if you look hard enough that the lockdown directive came on the 7th of March. They said to lockdown within two weeks. Now for me, if you've been given this scientific advice you don't wait 14 days let alone 16 you act immediately.
During these 16 days, two major sporting events were allowed to take place.
And SAGE is an independent body, but Dominic Cummings in his own way has made sure he stuck his oar in when it came to their policy directives to the govt. He is a bad egg at all levels. The death rates and disastrous handling of care homes prove it.
People want DC out....not enough Tory revolt over the matter to be of any relevance yet. That could change, time will tell.
He isn't being hanged for a poor govt response ffs. He went to Durham remember - that is his alleged crime. The point about Pandemic writing is not relevant to his trip to Durham - don't you see that!! You are dragging in the seperate matter of the govt response. Irrelevant to what he is "accused" of doing. I have no intention of rewatching the presser but as I recall (I said that before - little clue!) he made no mention of where he wrote about Pandemics so you can't just turn to his blog and say that is what he was referring to unless you get him to say so which the leftie press missed out on because they were too het up with fake moral outrage and wanting him to apologise or spontaneously self combust. In a court of law you can't just assume it was his blog you have to prove it.
Oh please tell me all about the RTA 1988 and visual impairment.....I'm all eyes and ears! I'll save you bother, your generalised remark above is of course inaccurate, some would even say incorrect. To drive a car you have to be able to read a number plate from about 20m away, so as long as DC could do that then he was perfectly entitled to have a little test drive out and about. Of course it's a bit too late to prove the extent of any visual impairment now so that's just another irrelevance that a court would throw out. Next!
Oh DC is a civil servant now is he....you sure?.....and the most senior one in the land too.....you sure about that too? Maybe you wrote that a bit too hastily eh? Mark Sedwell will be pissed to hear the news though. That statement gets thrown out too.
Oh and while we are correcting your work the full scientific advice, data, recommendations etc for SAGE will not be released until after the pandemic is over. There may have been some bits and pieces released but the full story hasn't been yet. I suggest that you hold fire until it becomes apparent who made the decisions about care homes etc before you start accusing people. I like a little bit of evidence to back a statement however from your post I can see you're not so fussy about that.
So in summary, if you don't like the fact that DC acted within the guidelines and thought for himself then send him a lockdown fine!
https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/sc ... 9-response
As I said its all there if you look for it. Without these documents, the press wouldn't be stringing up the Government with regards to the care home debacle. An article about eyesight, perhaps his eye problems were a figment of his imagination? Maybe that's why he took the wrong route back to London?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52802661
All I see is a lot of hot air from your debate, I will come back to the rest of your points if relevant over the next few days.
I think you need to look a bit closer as my debate has pointed out some pretty big holes in yours. Many of your facts are wrong or made up on the hoof and it's all rather glaringly obvious.
The point at hand is whether big bad Dom did wrong by travelling to Durham and then to the castle but you insist on jumping about all over the place rather than concentrating on the allegation. The best thing for you to do is to stop digging.
Don't bother coming back to me over the next few days as I have lost all faith in your ability to construct any form of coherent argument after your last but one post which was a tad embarrassing.
Yes, I agree that the issue was whether he did wrong and it's pretty obvious he did. He could have arranged childcare from London. he didn't need to drive that distance in lockdown. He had COVID19 symptoms so he was infectious and he didn't follow his own guidelines. He had eye problems, so shouldn't have got in a car.
Apparently one of the symptoms of COVID19 is conjunctivitis, whether he could read a number plate or not was irrelevant, he would be experiencing great discomfort trying a long-distance drive. I've had conjunctivitis and wouldn't contemplate a drive that long. He wasn't fit to drive to London, the trip to Barnard Castle was NOT a direct route to London.
Sorry, Jock you can keep on defending the indefensible but the majority of people in this country aren't stupid and can see this man for what he is. A liar and a fraud. I am just watching a survey of Conservative voters on Bloomberg, 63% want him sacked, 18% say he shouldn't be. If you're gullible enough to believe what he says that really isn't my problem.
Just out of interest, when his family live in Durham, where exactly was he going to get childcare for his kid in the middle of a pandemic. Please enlighten me. These stupid statements have been thrown around willy nilly by commentators but none of them have said what he should have done, just lots of posturing on what he shouldn't have done. Were you going to oblige and look after the kid, no, me neither, it was a family duty and that is the correct route in the circumstances.
I am aware that conjunctivitus is on the WHO symptoms list. It does not preclude you from driving -
stop making shit up - 20m is the law, the rest is your usual blah blah blah take on what you think is correct, consistent with most of the vitriol aimed at DC. Do a bit of research rather than just spouting off what you think is the law and I might take you seriously. Nobody ever said that the castle was a direct route to London.....look you're off on one of your tangents again! The direct route is the busy A1 which would have been a very stupid and dangerous test route to use.
The majority of people aren't stupid. I would say there is a very healthy number who are and plenty of gullible idiots whose current affairs awareness amounts to the last thing the beeb told them to think.
Too many people in the anti DC camp would happily break (and probably have) the lockdown to achieve their own personal agenda. It's much easier to go with the flow and say bad DC than to stop and think honestly about what you would have done in the same position. Me, I'd have been off to my folks if they had the set up that his did, no brainer. DC has simply made too many enemies as a result of his success behind Brexit and the big Tory majority at the last GE and therein lies the real push to get him out.