Which Failure To Strengthen Will Prove Most Costly?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.

Which failure to strenghten will prove most costly?

Goalkeeper
11
32%
Defensive Midfielder
22
65%
Striker
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
 
Total votes: 34

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

SPUDMASHER wrote:
flash gunner wrote:I went for defensive midfielder but i would kick out Average Al for a decent replacement just as quick
I would too, but then I'm just pointing out that he isn't as bad as some would have you believe. The way people attack him I think he is lucky that Matthew Hopkins isn't alive today. :wink:
I agree he isnt bad but the nickname average Al sums him up, he is average at best and an ideal number 2 most certainly but a club like Arsenal should have a top class keeper imo

User avatar
Tallest gooner
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:42 am

Post by Tallest gooner »

I voted for CDM, i thought we needed one even before song started the season well. i think a good, powerful, tall and tough tackling CDM will take shed loads of pressure off cesc and the back 4.

Plus when Song goes to the ACON, he will leave a massive void and leave us exposed, if some peoples answer is buy someone in january unless we spend big money they wont be able to slot straight into the team and prem league.

Saying that Almunia is weak and has never looked like a solid or class number 1 even when mad Jens was at the club!!

Easy to say buy someone but i havnt seen many names knocking about any suggestions???

User avatar
Bergkamp-Genius
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:19 pm

Post by Bergkamp-Genius »

augie wrote:
Bergkamp-Genius wrote:What about strengthening the manager or the boardroom options...
I can't just pick out one from the list because we need a general addition of quality through the spine of the team, 3 from 4 of GK CB CM CF would have made me very confident we would do very well this year, 2 from the four would have given us a good chance, 0 from the four means we are going to suffer the same problems as usual regardless of how good we look in individual games or a run of games, our lack of the right kind of quality depth in our spine will be our undoing once again.

I thought the same but decided not to bother saying it - too tired to get into an arguement/debate about it today :( :oops:
Don't tell me the scary Swale and EC3 have softened you up :lol: :lol:

Magic Hat
Posts: 3531
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:36 am

Post by Magic Hat »

Keeper

We could probably get away with lack of dm cover till Jan with a bit of luck, reasonably happy with Senderos and JD as cb cover (if Silvestere is ahead of Senderos, we are doomed). We can't get away with having an off form and average keeper for half a season

User avatar
green gooner
Posts: 1828
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Derry

Post by green gooner »

I voted for a DMF. It's OK having a go at Almunia, but the fact is the ball should not even get to him nine times out of ten.

We should be wimming more balls in the middle and giving away a lot less.

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Post by franksav63 »

green gooner wrote:I voted for a DMF. It's OK having a go at Almunia, but the fact is the ball should not even get to him nine times out of ten.

We should be swimming more balls in the middle and giving away a lot less.
Is that water polo G.G. ? :? :wink:

Magic Hat
Posts: 3531
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:36 am

Post by Magic Hat »

green gooner wrote:I voted for a DMF. It's OK having a go at Almunia, but the fact is the ball should not even get to him nine times out of ten.

We should be wimming more balls in the middle and giving away a lot less.
we have done that this season I thought so far

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

SPUDMASHER wrote:Whilst I agree that he isn't all that. I think that's a bit harsh.
There's no way you could blame him for Diaby's goal and the ones against Pompey and Everton were the defenses fault, not his.
Spuddy, the goal against Pompey was surely Almunia's fault??!! :shock: after all, he was outjumped on his own goalline by that ex-spud! :oops: :lol:

User avatar
gusher311
Posts: 1886
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 7:10 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by gusher311 »

I think we needed a midfielder. I don't wanna see Diaby out there for us anymore :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Post Reply