SteveO 35 wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:The very least Theo deserves is to be judged after he's had a regular run in the team and completed a series of 90 minutes, something both Denilson and Bendtner were allowed before judgement - be it right or wrong - was passed on them. Now that would be fairer than completely writing off someone that hasn't been afforded that luxury.

Without going all Hadareud on you and according to Arsenal.com, Denilson has played in 100 games (starting 82 and 18 as sub). Bendtner has played in 106 (but only 52 as a starter and 54 from the bench)
Theo has played in 110 games (61 as a starter)
Theo was born in 1989, Bendtner in 1988, and Denilson in 1988
So why is the judgement on Theo unfair compared to the other two ? ...
Because, like I said above, Theo needs a
regular run of games and/or completed 90 minutes. Despite what the statistics you've quoted above suggest, Theo has had neither. Nor has he had the benefit of many (if any) consecutive starting appearences - unlike the other two. Fair enough, he's got to earn that right but hasn't been helped by the constant injuries he's suffered.
SteveO 35 wrote:..Argue the point all you like and we will never agree. Walcott has been given more time on the back of the run at Anfield in a game we lost and the fact that he's English and scored a hat-trick in Croatia, whilst we ignore Bendtner's record for Denmark.
Don't be so quick to judge!!

I'm one of the few on here that has defended Nick in the past, using the same age excuse and the fact that he offers us something different from what we already have, that I've used for Theo.
I also agree that Theo is given more lattitude by some fans
purely because he's English. I think that is partly to do with the fact they we have so few of them in our side and are constantly given stick about it. Naturally, that makes some Arsenal fans even more desparate for him to succeed so they give him more slack.
As for Denilson, I'll admit that I don't think he's good enough for a team aspiring to win the major trophies. However, I've come to that judgement
after seeing him given a regular starting spot and run of consecutive games - again, not something that can be said about Theo.
I realise that, like Theo, Denilson's still young and he may well develop into a very good, maybe even great player. I genuinely hope he does for Arsenal's sake. Yet, from what I've seen of him since he came to the club, I don't think he has the assets to become anything more than an above average player - at the very best.
The difference as far as I'm concerned is that even from the little that Theo has admittedly produced thus far, I can genuinely say that I've seen enough to suggest that he could maybe become a great player for us oneday.
