WILLIAM GALLAS HAS OFFICALLY SIGNED FOR SPURS.

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

DB10GOONER wrote:He will deffo score against us. :(
If he does I will go fucking crazy. The fucking mercenary *word censored* :banghead: :banghead: :x

User avatar
euphoricone
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:02 am

Post by euphoricone »

What a great signing for them lot.

User avatar
nuttygoonerpaul
Posts: 874
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:50 pm
Location: enfield

Post by nuttygoonerpaul »

lets hope he does a drugs test and gets done , or get gets hurt and out for a season

User avatar
BT
Posts: 1591
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: London

Post by BT »

I bet he is brilliant for the scum and we're going to end up looking very silly for letting him go prematurely. This is our first choice central defender for the last few seasons, and we've let him go to spurs for less wages and a one year deal because again we have dilly-dallied like we did with Flamini and now we're woefully short in skill and experience in that area.

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

BT wrote:I bet he is brilliant for the scum and we're going to end up looking very silly for letting him go prematurely. This is our first choice central defender for the last few seasons, and we've let him go to spurs for less wages and a one year deal because again we have dilly-dallied like we did with Flamini and now we're woefully short in skill and experience in that area.
Perhaps, but I think we needed a change at the back, and that wasn't going to be Vermaelen.

Gallas is 33 and injury prone. I'm not sad to see him go, and hopefully Koscielny and Vermaelen can form a decent partnership - time will tell.

Gallas wouldn't have stayed to be a backup player, so maybe the choice the club had was either stick with Gallas as first choice (knowing he's injury prone) or find someone else.

Anyway, far to early to judge Koscielny, but Gallas is old news now. Sp*rs have themselves a decent player, which is annoying, but that's life.

thearsenal
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:46 pm

Post by thearsenal »

BT wrote:I bet he is brilliant for the scum and we're going to end up looking very silly for letting him go prematurely. This is our first choice central defender for the last few seasons, and we've let him go to spurs for less wages and a one year deal because again we have dilly-dallied like we did with Flamini and now we're woefully short in skill and experience in that area.
did wenger not offer him a one year contract with less wages, and he turned it down because he wanted a 2 year deal and a pay rise

so care to explain how we have dilly dallied like we did with flamini.

he was offered 1 year contract and said no so fuck him and fuck spurs

User avatar
BT
Posts: 1591
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: London

Post by BT »

thearsenal wrote:
BT wrote:I bet he is brilliant for the scum and we're going to end up looking very silly for letting him go prematurely. This is our first choice central defender for the last few seasons, and we've let him go to spurs for less wages and a one year deal because again we have dilly-dallied like we did with Flamini and now we're woefully short in skill and experience in that area.
did wenger not offer him a one year contract with less wages, and he turned it down because he wanted a 2 year deal and a pay rise

so care to explain how we have dilly dallied like we did with flamini.

he was offered 1 year contract and said no so fuck him and fuck spurs
Given that he's accepted one year and same wages at spurs, i can only assume that arsenal werent bothered about him leaving which i think is a mistake.

Wenger said yesterday he was preoccupied with signing Kos so in the meantime Gallas looked elsewhere. If you've had a good season, are a quality experienced player in a team of young half-arsed players and you're offered worse terms and a pay cut while your manager shops around, why would you feel wanted? I believe Wenger thought he'd get Kos with Campbell for back up and neglected to see that letting gallas go could be risky.

User avatar
marcengels
Posts: 7208
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: North Bank

Post by marcengels »

Probably a bit of pride from Gallas, BT? He refused the deal cos he was convinced that he could go abroad and get exactly what he wanted. I guess he couldn't, and coming back to Arsene with his tail between his legs, and after the Kos sogning, would be too much for Gallas' pride.

Now Wenger has all his trust in Vermaelen, Koscielny, Djourou and Song - which firstly doesn't exactly sound like he'll pull up any trees to get another CB and secondly, leaves us basically with Vermaelen plus the new unknow, the brittle and frankly average Djourou, and Song who is adequate there but if asked to do a job there will leave another position weaker.

More and more patchwork crap from Wenger.

:roll:

User avatar
BT
Posts: 1591
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: London

Post by BT »

Definitely an element of pride and short sightedness on gallas and his agent's part but people seem to want a loyalty from Gallas that Arsenal werent showing him. I'm just a bit frustrated by the bizarre choice to hang on to some players like Djourou, Diaby, Denilson, Almunia etc but discard a player that was doing a decent job as first team defender for the sake of matching his salary/ giving him two years like Sylvestre. I think Wenger was banking on Sol staying so Gallas wasnt a priority and i just have a feeling it might come back to haunt us.

User avatar
Vince
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Paris
Contact:

Post by Vince »

He always said he'll leave at the end of his contract since he's been stripped of the captaincy. It wasn't Arsenal choice, even though Arsenal wasn't keen to raise his wage and give him more than 1 year (because he didn't deserve it), it was Gallas choice to leave our great Club.
Trust me, he wont play a full season, he's injury prone. This summer he was a laughing stock with his injuries in France, every day he had a new one before the WC. And he didn't have any preparation so far, so I don't know how it could be different at Tottenham. And his attitude has been a constant problem since the start of his career. I don't think we should regret him.

User avatar
hugh jardon
Posts: 1431
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:37 am
Location: Clock End

Post by hugh jardon »

Gallas is a prize c.unt. End of.

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

BT wrote:Definitely an element of pride and short sightedness on gallas and his agent's part but people seem to want a loyalty from Gallas that Arsenal werent showing him. I'm just a bit frustrated by the bizarre choice to hang on to some players like Djourou, Diaby, Denilson, Almunia etc but discard a player that was doing a decent job as first team defender for the sake of matching his salary/ giving him two years like Sylvestre. I think Wenger was banking on Sol staying so Gallas wasnt a priority and i just have a feeling it might come back to haunt us.
Absolutely - the whole Cole thing was as much a mis-understanding as it was the Board not being willing to meet his wage request. But Had they simply let him negotiate back instead of offering a final "take it or leave it" offer and counting on him to sign it out of loyalty to the the club we might have avoided all that embarassment and still have a n even stronger side.

I find it very troubling how supporters expect more loyalty from everyone form the Board in every instance and are ready to accept whatever the Board does - because they are so "loyal" to Arsenal. If that is the case how come almost every decisioon they make benefits them personally more than it does the club? If that's the case why have they clearly sought to sell their shares and withdraw from Arsenal as they do?

I'll gladly give credit to our Board for the things it does right but those who willfully ignore really are going to have to look in the mirror and ask themselves some really tough questions down the line if things don't work out.

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

BT wrote:I bet he is brilliant for the scum and we're going to end up looking very silly for letting him go prematurely. This is our first choice central defender for the last few seasons, and we've let him go to spurs for less wages and a one year deal because again we have dilly-dallied like we did with Flamini and now we're woefully short in skill and experience in that area.
Trust me - We're MUCH better off without that twat.

We'll concede less this season and our team spirit is already looking to have improved as a result of his departure I bet.

We've gotten rid of a cancer and we're looking more united now. Besides, Vermaelen shits all over him and so does Koscielny (I hope). We'll sign one more CB as well and I bet he'll have a better season than Gallas.

Gallas leaving is only a positive for this club, and if it's for the scumbags down the road then even better.

LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Post by LDB »


User avatar
Mr FINSBURY PARK GOONER
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:01 pm
Location: Arsenal Country

Post by Mr FINSBURY PARK GOONER »

The deal has offically been completed. hate to say i told you so!


Truth is i dont really care.

Post Reply